Innovation in public policies: a bibliometric study for new research

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v9i3.19676

Keywords:

Innovation, Public policy, Innovation environment, Innovation management, Bibliometrics.

Abstract

Objective: To carry out a mapping of studies on innovation and public policies, presenting an overview of the scientific discussion on the topic to suggest proposals for future studies.

Design / methodology / approach: A bibliometric study, through exploratory factor analysis, with the objective of identifying the path that the phenomenon takes. For this, we use the techniques of citation, co-citation and bibliographic coupling.

Originality: Given the economic, social and technological importance of innovation, public policies appear as engines of the development of innovation, thus reinforcing the need to identify unexplored paths through the mapping of studies on the theme to identify unexplored paths.

Results: We identified the basis on which the theme studied was developed. Thus, three factors were observed: Economic Development, Innovation Ecosystems and State Participation. In the coupling analysis, we identified four factors, namely: Entrepreneurship, Changes in Public Policies, Networks and Clusters and Knowledge Source. Looking to the future, some study trends were presented, highlighting a new research agenda.

Theoretical and methodological contributions: We present some study trends on innovation and public policies, warranting a new research agenda.

Management contributions: This research enables managers and decision makers to understand the aspects regarding the theme, so that they can develop strategic innovation actions with the support of public policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Samara de Carvalho Pedro, Centro Universitário FEI

Doutoranda em Administração de Empresas pelo Centro Universitário FEI. Mestre em Administração de Empresas pela Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE. Bolsista da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES.

Fernanda Edileuza Riccomini de Souza, Universidade Nove de Julho

Doutoranda em Administração de Empresas pela Universidade Nove de Julho, na linha Pesquisa de Estratégia. Mestre em administração de empresas pela Universidade Nove de Julho.

Daniela Menezes Garzaro, Universidade Nove de Julho

Doutoranda em Administração de Empresas pela Universidade Nove de Julho. Mestre em administração de empresas pela Universidade Nove de Julho.

Claudia Brito da Silva Cirani, Universidade Nove de Julho

Doutor em Economia Aplicada pela Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz / Universidade de São Paulo - ESALQ / USP. Mestre em Economia Aplicada pela Universidade Federal de Viçosa. Professor Titular do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração da Universidade Nove de Julho - PPGA / UNINOVE.

Maria Tereza Saraiva de Souza, Centro Universitário FEI

Doutor e mestre em administração de empresas pela Escola Paulista de Administração de Empresas da Fundação Getúlio Vargas. Professor Titular do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração do Centro Universitário FEI.

References

Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). The resource‐based theory: dissemination and main trends. Strategic management journal, 27(7), 621-636. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.532

Acs, Z. J., & Amorós, J. E. (2008). Introducción: El proceso de creación de empresas. Estudios de economía, 35(2), 121-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52862008000200001

Amponsah, C. T., & Adams, S. (2017). Open innovation: Systematisation of knowledge exploration and exploitation for commercialisation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(03), 1750027. https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391961750027X

Arora, A., & Cohen, W. M. (2015). Public support for technical advance: the role of firm size. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(4), 791-802. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtv028

Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic learning implications of by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295952

Benavides, L. M. C., Tamayo Arias, J. A., Arango Serna, M. D., Branch Bedoya, J. W., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 20(11), 3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291

Boushey, G. (2012). Punctuated equilibrium theory and the diffusion of innovations. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00437.x

Cancino, C. A., Merigó, J. M., & Coronado, F. C. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of leading universities in innovation research. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(3), 106-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.03.006

Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research policy, 26(4-5), 475-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5

Culnan, M. J., O'Reilly III, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1990). Intellectual structure of research in organizational behavior, 1972–1984: A cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac20142022

Dini, M., & Stumpo, G. (2011). Políticas para la innovación en las pequeñas y medianas empresas en América Latina [Documentos de Proyectos, Nº 403]. Economic Comission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Cepal, 167.

Emodi, N. V., Murthy, G. P., Emodi, C. C., & Emodi, A. S. A. (2017). Factors influencing innovation and industrial performance in Chinese manufacturing industry. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14(06), 1750040. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877017500407

Fagerberg, J. (1994). Technology and international differences in growth rates. Journal of economic Literature, 32(3), 1147-1175.

Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research policy, 41(7), 1132-1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.008

Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies—The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research policy, 38(2), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.006

Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2020). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389

Figueiredo, P. N. (2016). Evolution of the short-fiber technological trajectory in Brazil's pulp and paper industry: The role of firm-level innovative capability-building and indigenous institutions. Forest Policy and Economics, 64, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.12.008

Freeman, C. (1987). Technology, policy, and economic performance: lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.

Freeman, C. (1994). The economics of technical change. Cambridge journal of economics, 18(5), 463-514.

Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of economics, 19(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309

Gomez, J., & Vargas, P. (2009). The effect of financial constraints, absorptive capacity and complementarities on the adoption of multiple process technologies. Research Policy, 38(1), 106-119. https://doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.013

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate data analysis, 7th Pearson new international ed. Harlow: Pearson.

Heikkila, T., Pierce, J. J., Gallaher, S., Kagan, J., Crow, D. A., & Weible, C. M. (2014). Understanding a period of policy change: The case of hydraulic fracturing disclosure policy in Colorado. Review of Policy Research, 31(2), 65-87. https://doi:10.1111/ropr.12058

Holyoke, T. T., Henig, J. R., Brown, H., & Lacireno-Paquet, N. (2009). Policy dynamics and the evolution of state charter school laws. Policy Sciences, 42(1), 33-55. https://doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9077-3

Kasabov, E., & Delbridge, R. (2008). Innovation, embeddedness and policy: evidence from life sciences in three UK regions. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20(2), 185-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537320801931671

Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American documentation, 14(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103

Kingdon, J. W., & Stano, E. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, 45, 165-169. Boston: Little, Brown.

Komlósi, É., Szerb, L., Ács, Z. J., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Quality-related regional differences in entrepreneurship based on the GEDI methodology: The case of Hungary. Acta Oeconomica, 65(3), 455-477. https://doi.org/10.1556 / 032.65.2015.3.6

Laranja, M., Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2008). Policies for science, technology and innovation: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting. Research policy, 37(5), 823-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.006

Lecluyse, L., Knockaert, M., & Spithoven, A. (2019). The contribution of science parks: A literature review and future research agenda. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 559-595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-09712-x

Lew, Y. K., Khan, Z., & Cozzio, S. (2018). Gravitating toward the quadruple helix: international connections for the enhancement of a regional innovation system in Northeast Italy. R&D Management, 48(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12227

Li, J., Xia, J., & Zajac, E. J. (2017). On the duality of political and economic stakeholder influence on firm innovation performance: Theory and evidence from Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1), 193-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2697

Lichtenberg, F. R., & Siegel, D. (1991). The impact of R&D investment on productivity–New evidence using linked R&D–LRD data. Economic inquiry, 29(2), 203-229. https://doi.org/10.3386/w2901

Lin, T. Y., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2010). Exploring the Knowledge Network of Strategic Alliance Research: A Co-citation Analysis. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 8(2).

Lucas Jr, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of monetary economics, 22(1), 3-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7

Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). National innovation systems—analytical concept and development tool. Industry and innovation, 14(1), 95-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710601130863

Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research policy, 31(2), 247-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00139-1

Martin, B. R. (2012). The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research policy, 41(7), 1219-1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.012

Mas-Tur, A., & Soriano, D. R. (2014). The level of innovation among young innovative companies: the impacts of knowledge-intensive services use, firm characteristics and the entrepreneur attributes. Service Business, 8(1), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-013-0186-x

Mazzucato, M. (2015). Innovation systems: from fixing market failures to creating markets. Revista do Serviço Público, 66(4), 627-640.

McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American society for information science, 41(6), 433-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365089016005007

Mendonça, H. L., & Fonseca, M. V. D. A. (2018). Working towards a framework based on mission-oriented practices for assessing renewable energy innovation policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 709-719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.064

Minniti, M. (2008). The role of government policy on entrepreneurial activity: productive, unproductive, or destructive?. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice, 32(5), 779-790. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00255.x

Mintrom, M. (2013). Policy entrepreneurs and controversial science: Governing human embryonic stem cell research. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(3), 442-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.761514

Moilanen, M., Østbye, S., & Woll, K. (2014). Non-R&D SMEs: external knowledge, absorptive capacity and product innovation. Small Business Economics, 43(2), 447-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9545-9

Pathak, S., Xavier-Oliveira, E., & Laplume, A. O. (2013). Influence of intellectual property, foreign investment, and technological adoption on technology entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2090-2101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.035

Prasad, S., & Tata, J. (2005). Publication patterns concerning the role of teams/groups in the information systems literature from 1990 to 1999. Information & Management, 42(8), 1137-1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.003

Podsakoff, P. M.; Mackenzie, S. B.; Bachrach, D. G.; Podsakoff, N. P. (2005). The Influence of Management Journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, v. 26, n. 5, pp. 473-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.454

Ramos‐Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic management journal, 25(10), 981-1004. https://doi.org/10.2307/20142173

Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of political economy, 94(5), 1002-1037. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420

Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71-S102. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3210

Schmitz, H., & Altenburg, T. (2016). Innovation paths in Europe and Asia: Divergence or convergence?. Science and Public Policy, 43(4), 454-463. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv053

Schubert, C. (2015). What Do We Mean When We Say That Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Policy) Increase “Welfare”?. Journal of Economic Issues, 49(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2015.1013859

Serra, F. A. R., Ferreira, M. P., Guerrazzi, L. A. D. C., & Scaciotta, V. V. (2018). Doing bibliometric reviews for the Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management. Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management, 17(03), 01-16. https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v17i3.2713

Sherwood, A. L., & Covin, J. G. (2008). Knowledge acquisition in university–industry alliances: An empirical investigation from a learning theory perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(2), 162-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00292.x

Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513

Thurik, A. R., Stam, E., & Audretsch, D. B. (2013). The rise of the entrepreneurial economy and the future of dynamic capitalism. Technovation, 33(8-9), 302-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.07.003

Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2010). Understanding the innovation impacts of public procurement. European planning studies, 18(1), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903343567

Visser, E. J., & Atzema, O. (2008). With or without clusters: Facilitating innovation through a differentiated and combined network approach. European Planning Studies, 16(9), 1169-1188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802401573

Vogel, R., & Güttel, W. H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 426-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12000

Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American political science review, 63(3), 880-899. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954434

Weisz, J. (2006). Mecanismos de apoio à inovação tecnológica. Brasília: SENAI/DN.

Willoughby, K. W. (2020). Endogenous innovation, outward-bound international patenting and national economic development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(3), 844-869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9705-1

Wonglimpiyarat, J. (2017). Tax and S&T Policies for Research Commercialization: Perspectives of Southeast Asian Countries. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14(04), 1750017. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877017500171

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Downloads

Published

17.12.2021

How to Cite

Pedro, S. de C., Souza, F. E. R. de, Garzaro, D. M., Cirani, C. B. da S., & Souza, M. T. S. de. (2021). Innovation in public policies: a bibliometric study for new research. International Journal of Innovation, 9(3), 496–521. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v9i3.19676

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2021): Sept./Dec.

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Innovation

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal.

The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s).

The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s).

The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html

Authors  are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.