The role of resources in recombinations and the degree of novelty of products
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v9i3.19958Keywords:
Resources, Innovation, Products, Degree of novelty, Recombinations.Abstract
Objective of the study: To explain the characteristics and dynamics of resources and recombinations associated with developing products with low and high novelty.
Methodology/Approach: The method was an integrative review of the literature on recombinant innovation. It included a creative synthesis that resulted in a theoretical model.
Originality/Relevance: The research addresses topics the literature neglects, like explaining which resources and recombinations and why could relate to high or low product novelty.
Main results: Certain features of resources (i.e., heterogeneity, specificity, accessibility) with high and low levels may differently influence costs, variety, and frequency of recombinations and, in turn, product novelty. To develop highly novel products, tangible resources, and internally produced new resources may be essential, as knowledge by itself may not be sufficient.
Theoretical contributions: Different resource characteristics and their influence on recombinations may help explain whether a product will have low or high novelty. By going beyond the novel recombinations, the research expands the literature's understanding of recombinations and product novelty.
Managerial contributions: Companies could assess ex ante which degree of product novelty besides types and costs of recombinations would result from their pools of resources. This assessment would make innovation more efficient for companies with fewer resources, like may occur in emerging markets.
Downloads
References
Adler, P. S., & Shernan, A. (1990). Adapting your technological base: The organizational challenge. Sloan Management Review, 31(1), 25–37.
Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.176
Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2004). Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9), 887–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.401
Ahuja, G., Lampert, C. M., & Tandon, V. (2008). Moving beyond Schumpeter: management research on the determinants of technological innovation. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 1–98. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211446
Alvarenga, R. (2016). Study of factors contributors to death of micro and small companies in the State of Maranhão. International Journal of Innovation, 4(2), 106–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/iji.v4i2.36
Arthur, W. B., & Polak, W. (2006). The evolution of technology within a simple computer model. Complexity, 11(5), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.20130
Arthur, W. B. (2007). The structure of invention. Research Policy, 36(2), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.11.005
Arthur, W. B. (2009). The Nature of Technology: What it is and how it evolves. Free Press.
Arts, S., & Veugelers. R. (2015). Technology familiarity, recombinant novelty, and breakthrough invention. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(6), 1215–1246. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtu029
Assink, M. (2006). Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: A conceptual model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060610663587
Belenzon, S. (2012). Cumulative innovation and market value: Evidence from patent citations. Economic Journal, 122(559), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02470.x
Bradley, S. W., Sheperd, D. A., & Wiklund, J. (2011). The importance of slack for new organizations facing ‘tough’ environments. Journal of Management Studies, 48(5), 1071–1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00906.x
Buchanan, M. (2015). Innovation slowdown. Nature Physics, 11, 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3222
Burns , R. W. (2000). John Logie Bair. TV pioneer. MPG Books.
Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (1998). Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(4), 474–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379803500406
Christensen, J. F (1994). Asset profiles for technological innovation. Research Policy, 24(1995), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00794-8
Christensen, J. F. (1996). Innovative assets and inter–asset linkages: A resource–based approach to innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 4(3), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599600000009
Christensen, J. F. (2000). Building innovate assets and dynamic coherence in multi–technology companies. In N. J. Foss, & P. L. Robertson (Eds.), Resource, technology and strategy: Explorations in the resource–based perspective (pp. 123–152). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203982259
Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.275
de Carvalho, G. D. G., Cruz, J. A. W., de Carvalho, H. G., & Stankowitz, R. F. (2017). Innovativeness measures: A bibliometric review and a classification proposal. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(1), 81–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2016-0038
de Carvalho, G. D. G., da Silva, E. D., de Carvalho, H. G., Cavalcante, M. B., & Cruz, J. A. W. (2017). Brazilian SMEs’ innovation strategies: Agro-industry, construction and retail. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 14(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2017.087097
De Vita, G., Tekaya, A., & Wang, C. L. (2011). The many faces of asset specificity: A critical review of key theoretical perspectives. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(4), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00294.x
Denrell, J., Fang, C., & Winter, S. G. (2003). The economics of strategic opportunity. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 977–990. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.341
D'Este, P., Marzucchi, A., & Rentocchini, F. (2017). Exploring and yet failing less: Learning from past and current exploration in R&D. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(3), 525–553. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtx044
Dibbem, J., Chin, W.W., & Heinzl, A. (2005). The impact of human asset specificity on the sourcing of application services. 13th European Conference of Information Systems Proceedings, 114.
Donaldson, L., Qiu, J., & Luo, B. N. (2013). For rigour in organizational management
theory research. Journal of Management Studies, 50(1), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01069.x
Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (2013). The evolution of technologies: An assessment of the state-of-the-art. Eurasian Business Review, 3(1), 3–46. https://doi.org/10.14208/BF03353816
Downs, J. B., & Velamuri, V. K. (2016). Business model innovation: Opportunities for the
biopharmaceutical industry: A systematic review. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 22(3), 19–63. https://doi.org/10.5912/JCB735
Dul, J. (2016). Necessary condition analysis (NCA): Logic and methodology of ‘‘necessary but not sufficient’’ causality. Organizational Research Methods, 19(1) 10–52, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115584005
Echterhoff, N., Amshoff, B., & Gausemeier, J. (2013). Cross–industry innovations–Systematic identification of ideas for radical problem solving. International Journal of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 7(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1083853
Elsban, K. D., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2020). Creating high-impact literature reviews: An
argument for ‘integrative reviews’. Journal of Management Studies, 57(6), 1277–1289. https://doi:10.1111/joms.12581
Fitzgerald, E., Wankerl, A., & Schramm, C. (2011). Inside real innovation: How the right approach can move ideas from R&D to market — and get the economy moving. World Scientific Publishing.
Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671
Forés, B., & Camisón, C. (2016). Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size? Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 831–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.006
Foss, N. J., & Ishikawa, I. (2007). Towards a dynamic resource–based view: Insights from Austrian capital and entrepreneurship theory. Organization Studies, 28(5), 749–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607072546
Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2012). Organizing entrepreneurial judgment: A new approach to the firm. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139021173
Foss, K., Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2018). Uncovering the hidden transaction costs of market power: A property rights approach to strategic positioning. Managerial and Decision Economics, 39(3), 306–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2905
Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00132-1
Gassmann, O., & Zeschky, M. (2008). Opening up the solution space: The role of analogical thinking for breakthrough product innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00475.x
Ghemawat, P., & Del Sol, P. (1998). Commitment versus flexibility? California Management Review, 40(4), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165963
Gittelman, M., & Kogut, B. (2003). Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Science, 49(4), 366–382. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.366.14420
Godin, B. (2017). Models of innovation: the history of an idea. MIT Press.
Goldenberg, J., Mazursky, D., & Solomon, S. (1999). Toward identifying the inventive templates of new products: A channeled ideation approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379903600205
Haddaway N. R., Collins A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015). The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLoS ONE 10(9), Article e0138237. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138237
Inglis, B. D., & Couples, G. D. (2020). John Logie Baird and the secret in the box: The undiscovered story behind the world’s first public demonstration of television. Proceedings of the IEEE, 108(8), 1371–1382. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/JPROC.2020.2996793
Jaccard, J. & Jacoby, J. (2020). Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Jansen. J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
Kalthaus, M. (2020). Knowledge recombination along the technology lifecycle. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 30(3), 643–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-020-00661-z
Kang, T., Baek, C., & Lee, J. (2019). Effects of knowledge accumulation strategies through experience and experimentation on firm growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.003
Kaplan, A. (2009). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science (4th ed.). Transaction Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315131467
Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069433
Kim, C., Jaeyong, S., & Nerkar, A. (2012). Learning and innovation: Exploitation and exploration trade-offs. Journal of Business Research, 65, 1189–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.006
Kline, S., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau, & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth (pp. 275–306). National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.17226/612
Koberg, C. S., Detienne, D. R., & Heppard, K. A. (2003). An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(03)00003-8
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
Kyriakopoulos, K., Hughes, M., & Hughes, P. (2015). The role of marketing resources in radical innovation activity: Antecedents and payoffs. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(4), 398–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12285
Lachmann, L. M. (1956). Capital and its structure. Sheed Andrews and McMeel.
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovative performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
Lee, L., & Barney, J. B. (2018). Strategic factor markets. In M. Augier, & D. J. Teece (Eds.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of strategic management (pp. 519–521). Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2
Lengnick–Hall, C. A., & Griffith, R. J. (2011). Evidence–based versus tinkerable knowledge as strategic assets: A new perspective on the interplay between innovation and application. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 28(3), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2011.03.003
Lewin, P. (2011). Capital in desequilibrium: The role of capital in a changing world. Ludwig Von Mises Institute.
Lu, X., Cui, W., & Zhang, X. (2018). A multidimensional understanding on innovation problem. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 213, 186–192. https://doi.org/10.2991/ichssr-18.2018.36
Lynham, S. A. (2002). The general method of theory-building research in applied disciplines. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422302043002
Majchrzak, A., Cooper, L. P., & Neece, O. E. (2004). Knowledge reuse for innovation. Management Science, 50(2), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0116
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
McGregor, S. L. T. (2018). Understanding and evaluating research: A critical guide. Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781071802656
Micaëlli, J. P., Forest, J., Coatanéa, E., & Medyna, G. (2014). How to improve Kline & Rosenberg's chain–linked model of innovation: Building blocks and diagram–based languages. Journal of Innovation Economics and Management, 3(15), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.015.0059
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.975966
Morill, C., & Morill, J. (2003). Internal auditors and the external audit: A transaction cost perspective. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(6–7), 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900310482632
Mukherjee, S., Uzzi, B., Jones, B., & Stringer, M. (2016). A new method for identifying recombinations of existing knowledge associated with high–impact innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(2), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12294
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. The Belknap Press.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
Olson, O., & Frey, B. S. (2001). Entrepreneurship as recombinant growth. Small Business Economics, 19(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016261420372
Padfield, G. B., & Lawrence, B. (2003). The birth of flight control: An engineering analysis of the Wright brothers’ 1902 glider. The Aeronautical Journal, 107(1078), 697–718. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000013464
Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Blackwell.
Popadiuk, S., & Choo, C. W. (2006). Innovation and knowledge creation: How are these concepts related? International Journal of Information Management, 26(4), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.03.011
Salou, H. (2004). The concept of innovativeness: should we need to focus? European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.16010.1108/14601060410515628
Savino, T., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., & Albino, V. (2015). Search and recombination process to innovate: A review of the empirical evidence and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12081
Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: a guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004244
Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1990). Strategy, complexity, and economic rent. Management Science, 36(10), 1178–1192. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.10.1178
Schriber, S., & Löwstedt, J. (2018). Managing asset orchestration: A processual approach to adapting to dynamic environments. Journal of Business Research, 90(9), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.027
Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles. McGraw–Hill.
Sheremata, W. A. (2000). Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.2307/259020
Si, S., & Chen, H. (2020). A literature review of disruptive innovation: What it is, how it works and where it goes. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 56(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101568
Silva, J. C. L., Braga, C. S. C., & Rebouças, S. M. D. P. (2016). Perception of the Brazilian manufacturing industry about the main barriers to innovation. International Journal of Innovation, 5(1), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v5i1.114
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sørensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666980
Sun, M., & Jiang, H. (2017). Innovating by combining: A process model. Procedia Engineering, 174(5), 595–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.193
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
Teece, D. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational
enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 8–37. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.54
Teece, D. J., Peteraf, M. A., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational
agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
Thomke, S. H. (1998). Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Management Science, 44(6), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1287
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 486-489. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308370
Van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2008). Optimal diversity: Increasing returns versus recombinant innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68(3–4), 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2008.09.003
Warnier, V., Weppe, X., & Lecocq, X. (2013). Extending resource–based theory: Considering strategic, ordinary and junk resources. Management Decision, 51(7), 1359– 1379. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2012-0392
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132319
Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Recombinant growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555595
Wenzel, M. (2015). Path dependence and the stabilization of strategic premises: How the funeral industry buries itself. Business Research, 8(2), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-015-0021-4
West III, G. P, & DeCastro, J. (2002). The Achilles heel of firm strategy: Resource weaknesses and distinctive inadequacies. Journal of Management Studies, 38(3), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00243
Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.2307/258554
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology.
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233–261.
Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577. https://doi.org/10.1086/227496
Williamson, O. E. (1983). Credible commitments: Using hostages to support exchange. American Economic Review, 73(4), 519–540
Youn, H., Strumsky, D., Bettencourt, L. M. A., & Lobo, J. (2015). Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 12(106), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0272
Zeppini, P., & Van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2013). Optimal diversity in investments
with recombinant innovation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 24(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2012.09.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Innovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal.
The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s).
The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s).
The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
