Examining green new product development through the demand-based view: Customer participation as a mediator

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/2025.28321

Keywords:

Green product, GNPD, demand-based view, market demand, customer demand, competitive pressure, customer participation, sustainable development

Abstract

Objective of the Study: This study aims to examine the key drivers of effective green new product development (GNPD) performance. Specifically, it explores the relationships between customer demand, competitive pressure, customer participation, and GNPD performance through the theoretical lens of the demand-based view. The study seeks to demonstrate how demand-based view influence green GNPD, with a particular focus on the mediating role of customer participation. 

Methodology: A quantitative research approach was employed, utilizing survey data collected from 81 Malaysian electrical and electronics (E&E) manufacturing firms. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to test the proposed relationships among customer demand, competitive pressure, customer participation, and GNPD performance. 

Originality: This study contributes to the literature by addressing a theoretical gap in the demand-based view, which has been underutilised in explaining green product innovation. By integrating customer demand, competitive pressure and customer participation into the GNPD framework, this study provides new insights into the antecedents of successful green innovation. The findings have academic relevance by extending the application of the demand-based view to sustainability-driven product development. 

Main Results: The results indicate that competitive pressure positively influences customer participation in GNPD, which in turn mediates the relationship between competitive pressure and GNPD performance. However, no significant relationship was found between customer demand and customer participation. These findings underscore the importance of competitive dynamics in driving customer engagement and sustainability initiatives, especially in emerging markets.

Theoretical Contributions: This study use the demand-based view as the underpinning and positioning customer participation as a crucial mechanism through which customer and competitive pressures translate into GNPD success.

Managerial Contributions: For managers, the study highlights the necessity of actively engaging and integrating customers throughout the GNPD process to meet market demand for sustainability. By understanding the role of competitive pressure in fostering customer participation, businesses can enhance their green innovation strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Fakhrul Yusuf, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Faculty of Industrial Management, Lebuh Persiaran Tun Khalil Yaakob, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia

Muhammad Fakhrul Yusuf currently is a senior lecturer with Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah. He is an engineer and technologist graduated in Mechatronics Engineering, with masters in Information Technology and PhD in Operations, Technology and Logistics Management. www.linkedin.com/in/muhammad-fakhrul-yusuf

Nurin Syamimi Jusoh, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Faculty of Industrial Management, Lebuh Persiaran Tun Khalil Yaakob, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia

Nurin Syamimi Jusoh   graduated in Bachelor in Industrial Technology Management with Honours from Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah.

Nur Muneerah Kasim, University of Selangor, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Batang Berjuntai, Malaysia

Nur Muneerah Kasim is currently attached to Universiti Selangor. She has PhD in Business Management from Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah.

Rashidah Ramle, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Computing Sciences Studies, College of Computing, Informatics and Mathematics, Perlis Branch, Arau Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia

Rashidah Ramle is a senior lecturer with Universiti Teknologi Mara Perlis.

Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Faculty of Industrial Management, Lebuh Persiaran Tun Khalil Yaakob, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia / Centre for Advanced Industrial Technology, 26600, Pekan Pahang, Malaysia

Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi has significantly contribute to various high impact journal in various topics, His focus is on organizational behaviour and knowledge management. He is an Associate Professor with Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah.

References

Abu, N. H., Huat, K. K., & Mansor, M. F. (2018). Implementation of green new product development among SMEs: barriers and critical success factors. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 150, p. 05038). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005038

Adner, R., & Levinthal, D. (2001). Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation. Management Science, 47(5), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.5.611.10482

Albino, V., Balice, A., & Dangelico, R. M. (2009). Environmental strategies and green product development: an overview on sustainability‐driven companies. Business strategy and the environment, 18(2), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.638

Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., & De Marchi, V. (2018). Absorptive capacity and relationship learning mechanisms as complementary drivers of green innovation performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(2), 432-452. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2017-0310

Ansu-Mensah, P. (2021). Green product awareness effect on green purchase intentions of university students’: An emerging market’s perspective. Future Business Journal, 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00094-5

Ar, I. M. (2012). The impact of green product innovation on firm performance and competitive capability: the moderating role of managerial environmental concern. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 854-864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.144

Arfi, W. B., Hikkerova, L., & Sahut, J. M. (2018). External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance. Technological forecasting and social change, 129, 210-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.017

Aripin, N. M., Mezhuyev, V., Nawanir, G., Yusuf, M. F., & Haron, N. R. H. M. (2023). Unveiling Key Drivers of Industry 4.0 Adaptation in CKD Automotive Manufacturing Companies: Evidence From Asia and South America. IEEE Access, 11, 136049–136062. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3337426

Barbu, A., Catană, Ș. A., Deselnicu, D. C., Cioca, L. I., & Ioanid, A. (2022). Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior toward Green Products: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16568. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416568

Bendapudi, N., & Leone, R. P. (2003). Psychological implications of customer participation in co-production. Journal of marketing, 67(1), 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.1.14.18592

Bhamu, J., & Singh Sangwan, K. (2014). Lean manufacturing: literature review and research issues. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(7), 876–940. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2012-0315

Boateng, J., & Catanzano, O. (2015). Advanced Therapeutic Dressings for Effective Wound Healing -A Review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 104(11), 3653–3680. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.24610

Chen, Y. (2008). The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9349-1

Chen, C. (2001). Design for the environment: A quality-based model for green product development. Management Science, 47(2), 250-263. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.2.250.9841

Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1452-x

Chen, J., & Liu, L. (2020). Customer participation, and green product innovation in SMEs: The mediating role of opportunity recognition and exploitation. Journal of Business Research, 119, 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.033

Chin, W. W. (2010). Handbook of Partial Least Squares. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8

Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 471-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0

Do, B., & Nguyen, N. (2020). The links between proactive environmental strategy, competitive advantages and firm performance: An empirical study in Vietnam. Sustainability, 12(12), 4962. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124962

Fauzi, M. A. (2021). Research vs. non-research universities: knowledge sharing and research engagement among academicians. Asia Pacific Education Review, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09719-4

Fletcher, D., & Sarkar, M. (2013). Psychological Resilience. European Psychologist, 18(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000124

Flörke, M., Schneider, C., & McDonald, R. I. (2018). Water competition between cities and agriculture driven by climate change and urban growth. Nature Sustainability, 1(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-017-0006-8

Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515

Fuller, R., Landrigan, P. J., Balakrishnan, K., Bathan, G., Bose-O'Reilly, S., Brauer, M., Caravanos, J., Chiles, T., Cohen, A., Corra, L., Cropper, M., Ferraro, G., Hanna, J., Hanrahan, D., Hu, H., Hunter, D., Janata, G., Kupka, R., Lanphear, B., Lichtveld, M., … Yan, C. (2022). Pollution and health: a progress update. The Lancet. Planetary health, 6(6), e535–e547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00090-0

Fontoura, P., & Coelho, A. (2022). How to boost green innovation and performance through collaboration in the supply chain: Insights into a more sustainable economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 359, 132005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132005

Fraccascia, L., Giannoccaro, I., & Albino, V. (2018). Green product development: What does the country product space imply?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1076-1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.190

Gerstenfeld, A. (1976). Study of successful projects, unsuccessful projects, and projects in process in West Germany. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-23(3), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1976.6447172

Ghazali, I., Abdul-Rashid, S. H., Md Dawal, S. Z., Huda, N., Shariff, A. H. M., Herawan, S. G., & Sakundarini, N. (2021). Guidelines for designing green products considering customers’ cultural preferences. Sustainability, 13(2), 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020673

Gmelin, H., & Seuring, S. (2014). Determinants of a sustainable new product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 69, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.053

Gomes, S., Lopes, J. M., & Nogueira, S. (2023). Willingness to pay more for green products: A critical challenge for Gen Z. Journal of Cleaner Production, 390, 136092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136092

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks. Sage, 165.

Hair, Joe F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202

Hair, Joseph F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hair Jr., J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.10008574

Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European business review, 26(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). Invited Editorial: A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hermundsdottir, F., & Aspelund, A. (2021). Sustainability innovations and firm competitiveness: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124715

Hojnik, J., & Ruzzier, M. (2016). The driving forces of process eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Insights from Slovenia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 812–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.002

Huang, X. X., Hu, Z. P., Liu, C. S., Yu, D. J., & Yu, L. F. (2016). The relationships between regulatory and customer pressure, green organizational responses, and green innovation performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3423-3433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.106

Huang, Y. C., & Jim Wu, Y. C. (2010). The effects of organizational factors on green new product success: Evidence from high‐tech industries in Taiwan. Management Decision, 48(10), 1539-1567. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011090324

Jiang, H., Lee, P. S., & Li, C. (2013). 3D carbon based nanostructures for advanced supercapacitors. Energy Environ. Sci., 6(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE23284G

Katsikeas, C. S., Leonidou, C. N., & Zeriti, A. (2016). Eco-friendly product development strategy: antecedents, outcomes, and contingent effects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0470-5

KeTTHA (2017). Green Technology Master Plan Malaysia 2017-2030 (GTMP), Ministry of Energy, Green Technology and Water (KeTTHA), Putrajaya, Malaysia.

Khor, K. S., & Mohamed Udin, Z. (2013). Reverse logistics in Malaysia: Investigating the effect of green product design and resource commitment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 81, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.08.005

Kong, W., Harun, A., Sulong, R. S., & Lily, J. (2014). The influence of consumers perception of green products on green purchase intention. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 4(8), 924-939.

Kuncoro, W., & Suriani, W. O. (2018). Achieving sustainable competitive advantage through product innovation and market driving. Asia pacific management review, 23(3), 186-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.07.006

Lestari, E. R., Dania, W. A. P., Indriani, C., & Firdausyi, I. A. (2021, April). The impact of customer pressure and the environmental regulation on green innovation performance. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 733, No. 1, p. 012048). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/733/1/012048

Leckie, C., Rayne, D., & Johnson, L. W. (2021). Promoting customer engagement behavior for green brands. Sustainability, 13(15), 8404. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158404

Liao, Z. J., & Chen, H. (2014). The antecedents and outcomes of firm’s environmental innovation-from the perspective of environmental policy and firm’s background characteristics. Stud. Sci. Sci, 32, 792-800

Linnenluecke, M. K. (2017). Resilience in Business and Management Research: A Review of Influential Publications and a Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 4–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12076

Loon, L. K., Udin, Z. M., Hassan, M. G., Bakar, Z. A., & Hanaysha, J. R. (2017). The Power of Organizational Innovativeness in Shaping Supply Chain Operational Performance. Advanced Science Letters, 23(9), 8579–8585. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.9933

Luan, N. T., Hau, D. N. D., & Thu, N. T. A. (2022). The Influence of Green Product Development Performance to Enhance Enterprise Effectiveness and Innovation. Economies, 10(5), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10050113

Li, Y. (2014). Environmental innovation practices and performance: moderating effect of resource commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 450-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.044

Lin, R. J., Tan, K. H., & Geng, Y. (2013). Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 101-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.001

Maarof, M. G. bin, Nawanir, G. bin, & Fakhrul, M. (2022). The Concepts and Determinants of Manufacturing Flexibility. In Enabling Industry 4.0 through Advances in Manufacturing and Materials. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering (pp. 189–197). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2890-1_19

Martínez-Cañas, R., Ruiz-Palomino, P., Linuesa-Langreo, J., & Blázquez-Resino, J. J. (2016). Consumer participation in co-creation: an enlightening model of causes and effects based on ethical values and transcendent motives. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 793. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00793

Martins, A. (2022). Green marketing and perceived SME profitability: the meditating effect of green purchase behaviour. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33(2), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-04-2021-0074

Mohd Shafie, S. H., Mahmud, M., Mohamad, S., Rameli, N. L. F., Abdullah, R., & Mohamed, A. F. (2022). Influence of urban air pollution on the population in the Klang Valley, Malaysia: a spatial approach. Ecological Processes, 11(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-021-00342-0

Mohiuddin, M., Al Mamun, A., Syed, F. A., Mehedi Masud, M., & Su, Z. (2018). Environmental knowledge, awareness, and business school students’ intentions to purchase green vehicles in emerging countries. Sustainability, 10(5), 1534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051534

Morgan, T., Anokhin, S. A., Song, C., & Chistyakova, N. (2019). The role of customer participation in building new product development speed capabilities in turbulent environments. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15, 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0549-9

Moshood, T. D., Nawanir, G., Mahmud, F., Mohamad, F., Ahmad, M. H., AbdulGhani, A., & Kumar, S. (2022). Green product innovation: A means towards achieving global sustainable product within biodegradable plastic industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 363, 132506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132506

Oesman, I. F. (2021, January). Consumers’ willingness to pay more for eco friendly products (Green products) classification daily needs products. INCHES 2020: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on economics engineering and social science, InCEESS 2020, 17–18 July, Bekasi, Indonesia (p. 250).

Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2020). Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31(1), 127–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

Pujari, D., Peattie, K., & Wright, G. (2004). Organizational antecedents of environmental responsiveness in industrial new product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.09.001

Razalli, M. R., Abdul Rahim, M. K. I., Noordin, A., Kafi, A., Lateh, A., Yusuf, M. F., & Shad, M. K. (2024). Global Trends of Circular Economy and Innovation Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(12), 4527–4537. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.191202

Ringle, C.M., Wende, S. and Becker, J.M. (2015) SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt. http://www.smartpls.com

Rungtusanatham, M., Miller, J. W., & Boyer, K. K. (2014). Theorizing, testing, and concluding for mediation in SCM research: Tutorial and procedural recommendations. Journal of Operations Management, 32(3), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.01.002

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002

Simon, F. L. (1992). Marketing green products in the triad. Columbia Journal of World Business, 27(3-4), 268-285.

Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Latan, H., & Sohal, A. S. (2022). Stakeholder pressure, green innovation, and performance in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The role of green dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 500-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2906

Soewarno, N., Tjahjadi, B., & Permatanadia, D. (2020). Competitive pressure and business performance in East Java Batik industry. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 329-336. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO12.329

Tanner, J. F. (1999). Organizational Buying Theories: A Bridge to Relationships Theory. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(98)00052-2

Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., Hariyati, H., Nafidah, L. N., Kustiningsih, N., & Nadyaningrum, V. (2020). The role of green innovation between green market orientation and business performance: Its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040173

Wang, M., & Liu, Z. (2022). How do green innovation strategies contribute to firm performance under supply chain risk? evidence from China’s manufacturing sector. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894766

Wang, J. (2022). Research on the impact of customer participation in virtual community on service innovation performance—the role of knowledge transfer. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 847713. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.847713

Wang, L., Li, W., & Qi, L. (2020). Stakeholder pressures and corporate environmental strategies: A meta-analysis. Sustainability, 12(3), 1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031172

Wei, S., Ang, T., & Jancenelle, V. E. (2018). Willingness to pay more for green products: The interplay of consumer characteristics and customer participation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 45, 230-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.08.015

Weng, H. H., Chen, J. S., & Chen, P. C. (2015). Effects of green innovation on environmental and corporate performance: A stakeholder perspective. Sustainability, 7(5), 4997-5026. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7054997

Xie, L., Li, D., & Keh, H. T. (2020). Customer participation and well-being: the roles of service experience, customer empowerment and social support. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 30(6), 557-584. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-11-2019-0228

Xie, X., Huo, J., & Zou, H. (2019). Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. Journal of business research, 101, 697-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.010

Yin, S., Li, B., Zhang, X., & Zhang, M. (2019). How to improve the quality and speed of green new product development?. Processes, 7(7), 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7070443

Yusr, M. M., Salimon, M. G., Mokhtar, S. S. M., Abaid, W. M. A. W., Shaari, H., Perumal, S., & Saoula, O. (2020). Green innovation performance! How to be achieved? A study applied on Malaysian manufacturing sector. Sustainable Futures, 2, 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100040

Yusuf, M. F., Ashari, H., & Razalli, M. R. (2018). Environmental Technological Innovation and Its Contribution to Sustainable Development. International Journal of Technology, 9(8), 1569–1578. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i8.2748

Yusuf, M. F., Ashari, H., & Razalli, M. R. (2021). Demand for Environmental Technological Innovation in the Manufacturing Industry. UMP Press.

Yusuf, M. F., Mohamad Nasarudin, N. A. I., Sorooshian, S., Fauzi, M. A., & Kasim, N. M. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Contingency Theory on Sustainable Innovation in Malaysian Manufacturing Firms. Sustainability, 15(9), 7151. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097151

Yusuf, M. F., Ramle, R., & Abdullah, N. (2022). Pressures on Manufacturing Industry to Practice Green Supply Chain Management in Malaysia. In Enabling Industry 4.0 through Advances in Manufacturing and Materials. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering (pp. 625–636). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2890-1_58

Zhang, W., Sun, B., & Xu, F. (2020). Promoting green product development performance via leader green transformationality and employee green self-efficacy: The moderating role of environmental regulation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6678. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186678

Zhang, X., & Dong, F. (2020). Why do consumers make green purchase decisions? Insights from a systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(18), 6607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186607

Zhou, J., Sawyer, L., & Safi, A. (2021). Institutional pressure and green product success: the role of green transformational leadership, green innovation, and green brand image. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 704855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704855

Zhuang, W., Luo, X., & Riaz, M. U. (2021). On the factors influencing green purchase intention: A meta-analysis approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 644020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644020

Published

10.07.2025

Issue

Section

Articles
Views
  • Abstract 821
  • pdf 507
  • pdf (Português (Brasil)) 84

Funding data