Knowledge sharing practices in multi-allocated communities of practice: an integrative review

Adriana Verissimo Karam-Koleski, Cristiano José Castro de Almeida Cunha, Solange Maria da Silva, Eduardo Moreira da Costa


Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to understand knowledge sharing practices used by communities of practice which have their points of contact spread geographically. These communities, denominated “multi-allocated Communities of Practice” (CoPs), need to use specific practices to share their knowledge.  

Methodology:  Integrative review of articles accessed at the databases: Scopus, Web of Science and SciELO. The articles were analyzed by means of thematic analysis.

Originality: Intraorganizational CoPs and their knowledge sharing initiatives have been widely studied. However, multi-allocated CoPs and their knowledge sharing practices still lack study.   

Findings: Four dimensions of knowledge sharing practices were identified and discussed: "Integrative place", "From takers to knowledge sharers", "Promoting connections" and "Implementing and sustaining”.

Contributions: This article presents contributions in two main aspects: 1) the dimensions which were identified can offer subsidies for the analysis of processes of knowledge sharing in communities of practice of this nature and 2) presented practices can collaborate with the qualification and enrichment of knowledge sharing practices in new or existing multi-allocated CoPs projects.

Conclusions: There is no standard array of knowledge sharing practices in multi-allocated CoPs. The common denominator is that the choice of these practices must take in consideration the objectives of the community, it´s  members´ characteristics, the nature of knowledge to be shared, as well as knowledge sharing channels and resources that are available.


Knowledge management; Communities of practice; Multi allocated communities of practice; Knowledge communities; Knowledge sharing practices.


Al-Rasheed, Amal, & Berri, J. (2016). Effective reuse and sharing of best teaching practices. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25, 163–178.

Antonacci, G., Fronzetti Colladon, A., Stefanini, A., & Gloor, P. (2017). It is rotating leaders who build the swarm: social network determinants of growth for healthcare virtual communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(5), 1218–1239.

APO. (2009). APO facilitator´s guide. Tokyo: APO.

Apostolou, D., Mentzas, G., Baraboutis, K., & Papadopoulou, S. (2004). Facilitating Knowledge Exchange and Decision Making within Learning Networks. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 10(3), 205–226. Retrieved from

Ardichvili, A. (2008). Learning and knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice: motivatores, barriers and enablers. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(4), 541–554.

Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571–582.

Basile, C. G. (2009). Intellectual capital: the intangible assets of professsional development schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Bontis, N., & Nikitopoulos, D. (2001). Thought leadership on intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 183–191.

Botelho, L. L. R., Cunha, C. C. de A., & Macedo, M. (2011). O método de revisão integrativa nos estudos organizacionais. Gestão e Sociedade, 5(11), 121–136. Retrieved from CUNHA O metodo da revisao integrativa nos estudos organizacionais.pdf

Bourdon, I., Kimble, C., & Tessier, N. (2015). Knowledge sharing in online communities: the power game. Journal of Business Strategy, 36(3), 11–17. Retrieved from

Bourhis, A., & Dubé, L. (2010). “Structuring spontaneity”: Investigating the impact of management practices on the success of virtual communities of practice. Journal of Information Science, 36(2), 175–193.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology - Research Designs (Vol. 2).

Cheng, E. C. K. (2015). Knowledge Management for School Development. In Knowledge Management for School Education.

Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, M. K. O., & Lee, Z. W. Y. (2013). Understanding the continuance intention of knowledge sharing in online communities of practice through the post-knowledge-sharing evaluation processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1357–1374.

Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Oxford: Elsevier Inc.

Davenport, E., & Hall, H. (2005). Organizational knowledge and communities of practice. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 170–227.

Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know.

Davis, H. C., Carr, L. A., Hey, J. M. N., Howard, Y., Millard, D., Morris, D., & White, S. (2010). Bootstrapping a culture of sharing to facilitate open educational resources. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(2), 96–109.

Hamunen, K., Virkkula, O., Hujala, T., Hiedanpaa, J., & Kurttila, M. (2015). Enhancing informal interaction and knowledge co-construction among forest owners. Silva Fennica, 49(1), 1–15.

Hara, N., Shachaf, P., & Stoerger, S. (2009). Online communities of practice typology revisited. Journal of Information Science, 35(6), 740–757.

Hartung, K., & Oliveira, M. (2013). Communities of Practice: creating and sharing knowledge. REGE, 20(3), 407–422.

Ho, L.-A., & Kuo, T.-H. (2013). How system quality and incentive affect knowledge sharing. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(7), 1048–1063.

Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2009). Dual Allegiance and Knowledge Sharing in Inter-firm R&D Collaborations. Organizational Dynamics, 39(1), 37–47.

Ipe, M. (2004). Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework. Human Resource Development Review, 2(4), 337–359.

Kezar, A., & Gehrke, S. (2015). Communities of transformation and their work scaling STEM reform. Retrieved from

Lee-Kelley, L., & Turner, N. (2017). PMO managers’ self-determined participation in a purposeful virtual community-of-practice. International Journal of Project Management, 35(1), 64–77.

Li, M., & Gao, F. (2003). Why Nonaka highlights tacit knowledge: a critical review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(4), 6–14.

Malone, D. (2002). Knowledge management: a model for organizational learning. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 3(2), 111–123.

NHS. (2005). ABC of Knowledge Management. In ABC of Knowledge Management. Retrieved from

Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of " ba ": Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: how japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Nonaka, I., Von Krogh, G., & Voelpel, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 27(8), 1179–1208.

Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts:Working Papers on Information Systems, 10(26), 10–26. Retrieved from

Pan, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (2003). Bridging communities of practice with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12, 71–88. Retrieved from

Pan, Y., Xu, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, C., Ling, H., & Lin, J. (2015). Integrating social networking support for dyadic knowledge exchange: A study in a virtual community of practice. Information and Management, 52(1), 61–70.

Piedade, V. C. H., Alcará, A. R., Chiara, I. G. di, Tomaél, M. I., & Rodrigues, J. L. (2009). Fatores que influenciam o compartilhamento da informação e do conhecimento. Perspectivas Em Ciência Da Informação, 14(1), 170–191.

Pivetta, E. M. (2016). Criação de valores em comunidades de prática: um framework para um ambiente virtual de ensino e aprendizagem bilíngue. (Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina). Retrieved from

Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Anchor Day Books.

Rathi, D., Given, L. M., & Forcier, E. (2014). Interorganisational partnerships and knowledge sharing: The perspective of non-profit organisations (NPOS). Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(5), 867–885.

Sánchez-Cardona, I., Sánchez-Lugo, J., & Vélez-Gonzalez, J. (2012). Exploring the potential of communities of practice for learning and collaboration in a higher education context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1820–1825.

Sims, Julian M. (2018). Communities of practice: Telemedicine and online medical communities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 53–63.

Soares, C. B., Hoga, L., Hoga, K., Peduzzi, M., Sangaleti, C., Yonekura, T., … Delage, A. (2014). Revisão integrativa: conceitos e métodos utilizados na enfermagem. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem USP, 48(2), 335–345.

Soekijad, M., Huis in ’t Veld, M. A. A., & Enserink, B. (2004). Learning and knowledge processes in inter-organizational communities of practice. Knowledge and Process Management, 11(1), 3–12.

Topousis, Daria E., Dennehy, C. J., & Lebsock, K. L. (2012). Nasa’s experiences enabling the capture and sharing of technical expertise through communities of practice. Acta Astronautica, 81, 499–511.

Wanberg, J., Javernick-Will, A., Asce, M., & Taylor, J. E. (2017). Mechanisms to Initiate Knowledge-Sharing Connections in Communities of Practice. Journal of Construction Engeeniring and Management, 143(11), 1–10.

Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131.

Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 1, 139–145.

Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: an updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Revista Iberoamericana de Gestão Estratégica (IJSM)
Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia (RIAE)
e-ISSN: 2176-0756

Revista Iberoamericana de Gestão Estratégica (IJSM) © 2022 Todos os direitos reservados.

Esta obra está licenciada com Licença
Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional