The influence of framing bias on the evaluation of performance information in the public sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/2025.27036Keywords:
framing bias, decision-making, evaluation of performance informationAbstract
Objective: To analyze the influence in which performance information is presented (framed), with positive or negative valence, has on the judgment of civil servants.
Method: An experimental design was used, with randomized manipulation of positive and negative valence scenarios, with data from the application of a structured questionnaire to 260 civil servants from the Federal University of Alagoas (UFAL).
Results: The analysis revealed the bias manifested itself more expressively in positive scenarios, with a strong tendency towards choices based on the certainty effect and its non-manifestation in negative scenarios.
Contributions: The study highlights the importance of understanding and mitigating framing bias in public management, suggesting raising awareness of this bias can improve the quality of decisions and promote more effective and informed practices. In addition to it, the evidence obtained can guide future research into the influence of heuristics and cognitive biases on decision-making in the public sector.
Downloads
References
Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & Kammoun, H. (2013). Do financial professionals behave according to prospect theory? An experimental study. Theory and Decision, 74(3), 411-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9282-3.
Aguiar, A. B. (2017). Pesquisa experimental em contabilidade: propósito, desenho e execução. Avanços em Contabilidade Científica e Aplicada, 10(2), 224-244. https://doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2017100206.
Aguiar, A. B., Mucci, D. M., & Lima, M. M. (2022). Pesquisa empírica quantitativa em contabilidade gerencial: uma proposta de tipologia e implicações para validade interna versus validade externa. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade-Repec, 16(3), 318-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.17524/repec.v16i3.3155.
Baekgaard, M., & Serritzlew, S. (2020). Those who understand it will not be persuaded: a performance information paradox. International Public Management Journal, 23(1), 138-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1461152.
Ballard, A. (2019). Framing bias in the interpretation of quality improvement data: evidence from an experiment. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 8(5), 307-314. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2019.08.
Barreto, P. S., Macedo, M. A. da S., & Alves, F. J. (2012). Análise do comportamento decisório frente à influência dos efeitos certeza e framing no ambiente contábil. Anais do Congresso Brasileiro de Custos – ABC. Recuperado de https://anaiscbc.emnuvens.com.br/anais/article/view/217.
Battaglio Jr, R. P., Belardinelli, P., Bellé, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2019). Behavioral public administration ad fontes: A synthesis of research on bounded rationality, cognitive biases, and nudging in public organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 304-320.
Bellé, N., Cantarelli, P., & Belardinelli, P. (2018). Prospect theory goes public: Experimental evidence on cognitive biases in public policy and management decisions. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 828-840.
Bellé, N., Cantarelli, P., & Wang, S. Y. (2024). The management of bias and noise in public sector decision-making: experimental evidence from healthcare. Public Management Review, 26(11), 3246-3269. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2322159.
Bellé, N., Giacomelli, G., Nutia, S., & Vainieri, M. (2022). Factoring in the human factor: experimental evidence on how public managers make sense of performance information. International Public Management Journal, 25(2), 178-191.
Brasil, Ministério da Educação. (2005). Lei nº 11.091, de 12 de janeiro de 2005 – dispõe sobre a estruturação do Plano de Carreira dos Cargos Técnico-Administrativos em Educação, no âmbito das Instituições Federais de Ensino vinculadas ao Ministério de Educação. Recuperado de: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004 2006/2005/lei/l11091.htm.
Bugalho, F. and Schnorrenberger, D. (2020). Avaliação de desempenho associada a vieses cognitivos na administração pública: insights da literatura internacional. Revista Eletrônica de Estratégia & Negócios, 13, 184. https://doi.org/10.19177/reen.v12e02019184-206.
Caamaño-Alegre, M. (2021). On glasses half full or half empty: understanding framing effects in terms of default implicatures. Synthese, 199(3-4), 11133-11159. Recuperado de https://doi-org.ez9.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s11229-021-03282-6.
Camargo, N. F. (2021). Auditoria, controle e vieses cognitivos: a percepção dos servidores públicos (Dissertação de mestrado). Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Escola de Políticas Públicas e Governo.
Campos Filho, A. C., & Paiva, L. H. D. S. D. (2018). Economia Comportamental Aplicada às Políticas Públicas. ENAP, Coordenação-Geral de Formação. Recuperado de http://repositorio.enap.gov.br/handle/1/3127.
Cheon, J. E., Nam, Y., Kim, K. J., Lee, HI, Gideon, P. H., & Kim, Y. H. (2021). Cultural variability in the attribute framing effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 754265. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754265.
Christ, M. H., Emett, S. A., Taylor, W. B., & Madeira, D. A. (2016). Compensation or feedback: Motivating performance in multidimensional tasks. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 50, 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.03.003.
Costa, D. F., Carvalho, F. de M., Moreira, B. C. de M., & Silva, W. S. (2020). Confirmation bias in managerial decision-making: an experimental study with managers and accountants. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 14. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2020.164200.
Cozby, P. C. (2003). Métodos de pesquisa em ciências do comportamento. São. Paulo: Editora Atlas.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. / John W. Creswell; tradução Luciana de Oliveira da Rocha. – 2. ed. – Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Croson, R., Gächter, S. (2010). The science of experimental economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 73 (1), 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.09.008.
Dalazen, L., Silva, S. C. V. da, Lucena, G. L., & Nobre, C. (2022). Tolerância ao risco e características sociodemográficas na tomada de decisão em investimentos financeiros. Revista de Ciências da Administração, 24(62), 122-139. 10.5007/2175-8077.2022.e85721.
Ferreira, J. R. R. (2022). Decision-making under risk: conditions affecting the risk preferences of politicians in digitalization. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 1-12, 3036. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19053036.
Fita, E., & Keco, R. (2023). The Impact of Training and Career Opportunities on The Performance of Public Organizations. Quality-Access to Success, 24(192), 271-276. 10.47750/QAS/24.192.31.
Freitas, H., Oliveira, M., Saccol, A. Z., & Moscarola, J. (2000). O método de pesquisa survey. Revista de Administração da Universidade de São Paulo, 35(3).
Frezatti, F., Beck, F., Mucci, D. M., & Schlup, D. (2021). Reflexões sobre a viabilidade de survey como abordagem metodológica para pesquisa em controle gerencial. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade (REPeC), 15(1), 68-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.17524/repec.v15i1.2712.
Fuenzalida, J., Van Ryzin, G. G., & Olsen, A. L. (2020). Are managers susceptible to framing effects? An experimental study of professional judgment of performance metrics. International Public Management Journal, 24(3), 314-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2020.1752338.
Gosling, C. J., Caparos, S., & Moutier, S. (2020). The interplay between the importance of a decision and emotion in decision-making. Cognition and Emotion, 34(6), 1260-1270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1741340.
Grossi, G., & Argento, D. (2022). The fate of accounting for public governance development. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(9), 272-303. https://doi-org.ez9.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2020-5001.
Hernandez, J. M. da C., Basso, K., & Brandão, M. M. (2014). Experimental research in marketing. Brazilian Journal Of Marketing, 13(2). 10.5585/remark.v13i2.2692.
Hill, M. M.; Hill, A. (1998). A construção de um questionário. Dinâmica – Centro de Estudos sobre a Mudança Socioeconômica.
Hinson, J. M., Whitney, P., Wilson, C. G., & Nusbaum, A. T. (2019). Working memory loads differentially influence frame-induced bias and normative choice in risky decision making. Plos one, 14(3), e0214571. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214571.
Holford, D. L., Juanchich, M., & Sirota, M. (2022). Characteristics of quantifiers moderate the framing effect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 35(1), e2251. https://doi-org.ez9.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1002/bdm.2251.
Iotzov, V., Weiß, M., Windmann, S., & Hein, G. (2023). Valence framing induces cognitive bias. Current Psychology, 42(34), 30381-30392. https://doi-org.ez9.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s12144-022-03797-2.
Jain, G., Gaeth, G. J., Nayakankuppam, D., & Levin, I. P. (2020). Revisiting attribute framing: The impact of number roundedness on framing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 109-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.04.006.
Janiszewski, C., Silk, T., & Cooke, A. D. (2003). Different scales for different frames: The role of subjective scales and experience in explaining attribute-framing effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1086/378612.
Jin, J., Zhang, W., & Chen, M. (2017). How consumers are affected by product descriptions in online shopping: event-related potentials evidence of the attribute framing effect. Neuroscience research, 125, 21-28. https://doi-org.ez9.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1016/j.neures.2017.07.006.
Jugnandan, S., & Willows, G. D. (2023). Towards an integrated debiasing framework for consumer financial decisions: A reflection on debiasing research. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(4), 1544-1560. https://doi-org.ez9.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1111/ijcs.12935.
Kahneman, D. (2012). Rápido e devagar: duas formas de pensar. / Daniel Kahneman; tradução Cássio de Arantes Leite. – 1ª ed. – Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), p. 263-291.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341-350. 10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341.
Kaizer, D. C. P. L., Rodrigues, E. S. F. L., & Ferreira, A. S. M. R. (2021). Decisões financeiras à luz da economia comportamental: estudo comparativo dos alunos dos cursos de Economia e Administração de uma universidade federal brasileira. Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas: Investigación y Reflexión, 29(2), 225-248.
Kim, M. H. (2022). Framing effects, procedural fairness, and the nonprofit managers’ reactions to job layoffs in response to the economic shock of the COVID-19 crisis. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 33(5), 1035-1050.
Knies, E., Borst, R. T., Leisink, P., & Farndale, E. (2022). The distinctiveness of public sector HRM: A four‐wave trend analysis. Human Resource Management Journal, 32(4), 799-825. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12440.
Kuvaas, B., & Selart, M. (2004). Effects of attribute framing on cognitive processing and evaluation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 95(2), 198-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.08.001.
Leary, M. R. (2004). Introduction to behavioral research methods. Pearson Education New Zealand.
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 76(2), 149-188. 10.1006/obhd.1998.2804.
Libby, R., Bloomfield, R., & Nelson, M. W. (2002). Experimental research in financial accounting. Accounting, organizations and society, 27(8), 775-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00011-3.
Lima, M. M. (2023). Cenários experimentais em pesquisas contábeis: pontos de destaque no desenvolvimento metodológico. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 34(92), e1594. 10.1590/1808-057x20231594.pt.
Liu, B., Qin, Z., & Zhang, J. (2022). Cognitive bias in citizens’ perceptions of government performance in response to COVID-19: Evidence from a large-scale survey experiment in China. International Public Management Journal, 25(7), 1072-1093. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2056276.
Liu, D., Juanchich, M., & Sirota, M. (2020). Focus to an attribute with verbal or numerical quantifiers affects the attribute framing effect. Acta Psychologica, 208, 103088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103088.
Mariani, C. B., & Lassance, A. (2020). Uma governança orientada por diretrizes de governo aberto aprimora o valor público de programas governamentais?. Revista do Serviço Público Edição Especial: Caminhos da Governança Pública, 71c, 34-56. https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v71.i0.4485.
Meira Junior, C. M. (2003). Validação de uma lista de checagem para análise qualitativa do saque do voleibol. Motriz Revista de Educação Física, 9(3), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.5016/1010.
Mikkesen, M. F. (2021). Making sense of performance information on effectiveness, costs, and equality during the COVID-19 pandemic. The importance of reference points for citizens’ performance information use. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.42.205.
Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information?. Journal Of Public Administration Research And Theory, 20(4), 849-866. 10.1093/jopart/muq004.
Olsen, A. L. (2015). Negative performance information causes asymmetrical evaluations and elicits strong responsibility attributions. In 111th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association San Francisco. 3 a 6 de September, San Francisco, CA.
Pleger, L. E., Lutz, P., & Sager, F. (2018). Public acceptance of incentive-based spatial planning policies: a framing experiment. Land Use Policy, 73, 225-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.022.
Poór, J., Jepsen, D. M., Bátfai, B. V. M., Pótó, Z., Valentinyi, K. V., & Karoliny, Z. (2021). Regional HRM trends in private and public sectors: a comparative approach. Journal of East-West Business, 27(4), 311-331. 10.1080/10669868.2021.1881018.
Santos, E. C. R.; Prazeres, R. V.; Silva, W. V.; Anjos, L. C. M.; Lima Filho, R. N. (2023). Tomada de Decisões Sob Risco: um estudo experimental com servidores de uma instituição pública federal de ensino de Alagoas. Revista Evidenciação Contábil & Finanças, 11(3), 82-99. 10.22478/ufpb.2318-1001.2023v11n3.67765.
Silvestre, H. C. (2019). A (Nova) governança pública. / Hugo Consciência Silvestre. – Brasília: Enap.
Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 125-134.
Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. The American Economic Review, 69(4), 493-513.
Tabak, B. M., & Amaral, P. H. R. (2018). Vieses cognitivos e desenho de políticas públicas. Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas, 8(2), 472-491.
Teixeira, A. F., & Gomes, R. C. (2019). Governança pública: uma revisão conceitual. Revista do Serviço Público - RSP, 70(4), 519-550.
Tran, Y. T., Nguyen, N. P., & Hoang, T. C. (2022). How do innovation and financial reporting influence public sector performance in a transition market?. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 12(4), 645-662. https://doi-org.ez9.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1108/JAEE-06-2021-0180.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458.
Wong, R. S. (2023). An experimental investigation of attribute framing effects on risky sourcing behaviour: the mediating role of attention allocated to suppliers' quality information. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 43(13), 205-225. https://doi-org.ez9.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2022-0604.
Wyszynski, M., & Diederich, A. (2022). Keep your budget together! Investigating determinants on risky decision-making about losses. Plos One, 17(3), e0265822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265822.
Yusnaini, Y., Hakiki, A., & Wahyudi, T. (2023). Cognitive Mapping and Framing Bias on Decision Making. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 8(3), 227-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.3.1986.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lyzandra Marthyelly Cavalcante Lima , Rodrigo Vicente dos Prazeres , Daiane Pias Machado, Polyandra Zampiere Pessoa da Silva , Alvaro Fabiano Pereira de Macêdo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Abstract 108
- pdf 13
- pdf (Português (Brasil)) 31
