Revisão sistemática da literatura sobre a relação entre inovação e desempenho financeiro das startups
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/exactaep.2022.20997Palavras-chave:
inovação, startups, desempenho, revisão sistemática de literaturaResumo
O objetivo deste artigo é desenvolver uma Revisão Sistemática de Literatura (RSL) sobre a relação entre inovação e desempenho financeiro em startups. Foram selecionados 49 artigos nas bases de dados Scopus e Web of Science. As análises foram apoiadas nas três leis da bibliometria clássica. O período de 2011 a 2020 foi definido para a elaboração deste estudo. Há necessidade de as startups adotarem uma cultura organizacional que adote práticas inovadoras e norteie o ambiente interno na adoção de comportamentos inovadores, bem como estreite as relações entre as universidades, incubadoras e fontes de financiamento com formação de alianças fortes para a promoção da inovação além de um amadurecimento maior nas redes de cooperação entre as empresas. A contribuição consiste em oferecer evidências sobre os resultados dos estudos, que podem sustentar a tomada de decisão de gestores de startups e gestores públicos, na criação de estratégias e políticas orientada a competitividade.
Downloads
Referências
ABSTARTUPS. Associação Brasileira de Startups. (2018). << https://abstartups.com.br/definicao-startups/>>. Acesso em: junho de 2021.
AGARWAL, R., & SHAH, S. K. (2014). Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: Firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators. Research Policy, 43(7), 1109-1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.012
ALI, A. (1994). Pioneering versus incremental innovation: Review and research propositions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 11, n. 1, p. 46–61, https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1110046
ALONSO, D., GONZÁLEZ, N., & NIETO, M. effect on entrepreneurship?”, Journal of International Entrepreneurship (en prensa).
BEYHAN YASAR, N., SEZEN, B., & KARAKADILAR, I. S. (2019). Mediating effect of continuous improvement on the relationship between innovation and financial performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(7-8), 893-907. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1353415
BIOLCHINI, J., MIAN, P. G., NATALI, A. C. C., & TRAVASSOS, G. H. (2005). Systematic review in software engineering. System Engineering and Computer Science Department COPPE/UFRJ, Technical Report ES, 679(05), 45.
BOLIVAR-RAMOS, M.T., GARCIA-MORALES, V.J. AND GARCIA-SANCHEZ, E. (2012). “Technological distinctive competencies and organizational learning: effects on organizational innovation to improve firm performance”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 331-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.03.006.
BORDONS, M., & GÓMEZ, I. (2000). Collaboration networks in science. The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield, 197-213.
CACCIOLATTI, L., ROSLI, A., RUIZ-ALBA, J. L., & CHANG, J. (2020). Strategic alliances and firm performance in startups with a social mission. Journal of Business Research, 106, 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.047
CHAMMASSIAN, R. G., & SABATIER, V. (2020). The role of costs in business model design for early-stage technology startups. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120090
CHO, MEEHEE; BONN, MARK A.; HAN, SU JIN. (2019). Innovation ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for startup and established restaurants and impacts upon performance. Industry And Innovation, [S.L.], v. 27, n. 4, p. 340-362, 4 jul. Informa UK Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1633280.
CHOI, E. & LEE, K. C. (2016). Relação entre a dinâmica da estrutura da rede social e a inovação: análises em nível micro de equipes multifuncionais virtuais em uma empresa multinacional B2B. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 65, p.151-162, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.021
CLAUSS, T. et al. (2019). Strategic Agility, Business Model Innovation, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, p. 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2910381
COLOMBO, M. G., & PIVA, E. (2012). Firms’ genetic characteristics and competence-enlarging strategies: A comparison between academic and non-academic high-tech start-ups. Research Policy, 41(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.010
COLOMBO, M. G., DOGANOVA, L., PIVA, E., D’ADDA, D., & MUSTAR, P. (2015). Hybrid alliances and radical innovation: the performance implications of integrating exploration and exploitation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(4), 696-722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9363-x
DAMANPOUR, F. (2010). An integration of research findings of effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovations. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 996-1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00628.x
DE GODOI, T. X., MENOLLI, A., & DIONÍSIO, G. M. (2019). Software Startups Success Factors Study under the Entrepreneurial Perspective Estudo sobre os Fatores de Sucesso de Startups de Software sob a Perspectiva Empreendedora. https://doi.org/10.1145/3330204.3330263
DE GROOTE, J. K., & BACKMANN, J. (2020). Initiating open innovation collaborations between incumbents and startups: How can David and Goliath get along?. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(02), 2050011. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919620500115
DE-LA-TORRE-UGARTE-GUANILO, M. C.; TAKAHASHI, R. F.; BERTOLOZZI, M. R. (2011). Revisão sistemática: noções gerais. Rev. esc. enferm. USP [online]. vol.45, n.5, pp.1260-1266. ISSN 0080-6234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342011000500033.
ETZKOWITZ, H. & LEYDESDORFF, L. (1995). The triple helix–university–industry–government relations: a laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review, 14(1): 14–19. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2480085
ETZKOWITZ, H. & LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘‘mode 2’’ to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29:109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
ETZKOWITZ, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research policy, 27(8), 823-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6
FERRIANI, S.; GARNSEY, E. & LORENZONI, G. (2012). Continuity and change in a spin-off venture: the process of reimprinting. Industrial And Corporate Change, [S.L.], v. 21, n. 4, p. 1011-1048, 8 mar. Oxford University Press (OUP). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts001.
GÖK, O., & PEKER, S. (2017). Understanding the links among innovation performance, market performance and financial performance. Review of Managerial Science, 11(3), 605-631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0198-8.
GREVE, H. R.; TAYLOR, A. Innovations as catalysts for organizational change: Shifts in organizational cognition and search. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 45, n. 1, p. 54–80, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2666979
HOJNIK, J. & RUZZIER, M. (2016). The driving forces of process eco-innovation and its impact on performance: insights from Slovenia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13:812-825, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.002.
HUTAHAYAN, B. (2020). The mediating role of human capital and management accounting information system in the relationship between innovation strategy and internal process performance and the impact on corporate financial performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-02-2018-0034.
JEONG, J., KIM, J., SON, H., & NAM, D. I. (2020). The role of venture capital investment in startups’ sustainable growth and performance: Focusing on absorptive capacity and venture capitalists’ reputation. Sustainability, 12(8), 3447. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083447.
JIMÉNEZ-JIMÉNEZ, D., & SANZ-VALLE, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of business research, 64(4), 408-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010
KATZ, J. S., & MARTIN, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration?. Research policy, 26(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1.
KITCHENHAM, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004), 1-26. ISSN: 1353-7776
KLUGE, J., MEFFERT, J., & STEIN, L. (2000). The German road to innovation. The McKinsey Quarterly, 2(1), 99-105.
KOHLER, T. (2016). Corporate accelerators: Building bridges between corporations and startups. Business Horizons, 59(3), 347-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/jbushor.2016.01.008.
KORPER, A. K., PATRÍCIO, L., HOLMLID, S., & WITELL, L. (2020). Service design as an innovation approach in technology startups: a longitudinal multiple case study. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(2), 303-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12383
KRETSCHMER, H., LIMING, L., & KUNDRA, R. (2001). Chinese-Indian-German collaboration results that provided the impetus for the foundation of COLLNET. Scientometrics, 52(3), 445-456. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014247900224.
KUCKERTZ, A., BRÄNDLE, L., GAUDIG, A., HINDERER, S., REYES, C. A. M., PROCHOTTA, A., ... & BERGER, E. S. (2020). Startups in times of crisis–A rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, e00169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00169
LIMA, R. A. D., VELHO, L. M. L. S., & FARIA, L. I. L. D. (2007). Indicadores bibliométricos de cooperação científica internacional em bioprospecção. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 12, 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-99362007000100005.
MAI, A. N. et al. The lasting effects of innovation on firm profitability: panel evidence from a transitional economy, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, v. 32, n. 1, p. 3417-3436, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1660199.
Management, 59, 39– 47. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2016.1117329.
MANGIZA, P., & BROWN, I. (2020, September). Requisite Skills Profile of Software Development Professionals for Startups. In Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists 2020 (pp. 102-109). https://doi.org/10.1145/3410886.3410904.
MEADOWS, C. (1999, May). Analysis of the Internet Key Exchange protocol using the NRL protocol analyzer. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (Cat. No. 99CB36344) (pp. 216-231). IEEE. Https://doi.org/10.1109/SECPRI.1999.766916
MITTAL, T., & MADAN, P. (2020). Impact of financing patterns on business performance of e-startups in India: a research model. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 21(4), 490-508. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2020.105983
NG, W. K. B., APPEL-MEULENBROEK, R., CLOODT, M., & ARENTZE, T. (2019). Towards a segmentation of science parks: A typology
study on science parks in Europe. Research Policy, 48(3), 719-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.004
NICOTRA, M., ROMANO, M., CASTROGIOVANNI, A., & CORRENTE, S. (2020). Startups, Innovation and Performance: An Empirical Analysis in the Italian Context Using SMAA-S. In The Entrepreneurial Behaviour: Unveiling the cognitive and emotional aspect of entrepreneurship. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-507-920201008.
NORUZY A, DALFARD VM, AZHDARI B, NAZARI-SHIRKOUHI S, REZAZADEH A (2013) Relations between transformational leadership, organizational learning, knowledge management, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: an empirical investigation of manufacturing firms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64(5–8):1073–1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4038-y.
OECD., Development (Paris)., Development. Development Centre, Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques (Paris), Statistical Office of the European COMMUNITIES, & SOCIETY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT. (2005).
Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (No. 4). Org. for Economic Cooperation & Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264213081-zh.
PARK, S. (2016). Differences in technology innovation R&D performance creation behavior between for‑profit institutions and not‑for‑profit institutions. Park Springer Plus, 5:451, p. 1-23, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2092-x.
PIENING, E. P., & SALGE, T. O. (2015). Understanding the antecedents, contingencies, and performance implications of process innovation: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 80-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12225.
RIES, E. (2012). A Startup Enxuta. São Paulo: Leya, 275p.
ROTHAERMEL, F. T., & THURSBY, M. (2005). Incubator firm failure or graduation?: The role of university linkages. Research policy, 34(7), 1076-1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.012
SMALL, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
STECK, P. E. & GEENHUIZEN, M. S. VAN. (2016). The influence of international research interaction on national innovation performance: a bibliometric approach. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 110: 61–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.017
TRANFIELD, D., DENYER, D. & SMART, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14: 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375.
TSAI, K. H. AND YANG, S. Y. (2014). “The contingent value of firm innovativeness for businessperformance under environmental turbulence”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 343-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-012-0225-4.
VAN ECK, N. J., & WALTMAN, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Measuring scholarly impact (pp. 285-320). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
WALTER, A., PARBOTEEAH, K. P., RIESENHUBER, F., & HOEGL, M. (2011). Championship behaviors and innovations success: An empirical investigation of university spin‐offs. Journal of product innovation management, 28(4), 586-598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00826.x
WANG, Z., HE, Q., XIA, S., SARPONG, D., XIONG, A., & MAAS, G. (2020). Capacities of business incubator and regional innovation performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120125
WILSON, G. A., & SLOBODZIAN, A. D. (2019). Enhancing financial performance by pharmacy innovation. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 37(4), 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1562
WINTER, S. G. (2006). Toward a neo-Schumpeterian theory of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(1), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtj006.
YILDIZ, S., & KARAKAS, A. (2012). Defining methods and criteria for measuring business performance: A comparative research between the literature in Turkey and foreign. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1091-1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1090.
ZHANG, Y. et al. (2020). Effects of firm, industry, and country-level innovation on firm performance. Marketing Letters, v. 31, p. 231-245, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-020-09530-y
ZIZLAVSKY, O. (2016). Innovation performance measurement: research into Czech business practice. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 29(1), 816-838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1235983
ZULU-CHISANGA, S., BOSO, N., ADEOLA, O., & OGHAZI, P. (2016). Investigating the path from firm innovativeness to financial performance: The roles of new product success, market responsiveness, and environment turbulence. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 26(1), 51-68.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Autores
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Autores que tiverem artigos aceitos para publicação na Revista Exacta concordam com os seguintes termos:
- A Cessão dos Direitos Autorais da publicação do artigo à Revista Exacta;
- Os autores que tiverem seus trabalhos aceitos e publicados na Revista Exacta estão sujeitos a Política de Direitos Autorais CC BY NC SA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/;
- A publicação do artigo pela Revista Exacta, em caráter de exclusividade e em meio eletrônico;
- A indexação do artigo em bases de dados nacionais e internacionais, diretórios, bibliotecas digitais e bases bibliométricas em que a Revista estiver e vir a estar indexada.
