FMS® performance of women and men practicing resistance training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/22.2023.23301Keywords:
Physical Functional Performance, Resistance Training, Exercise Movement TechniquesAbstract
Introduction: Resistance training (RT) is part of the physical fitness program of a large number of people. In these programs, periodic evaluations are carried out to plan and monitor the effects of training. Recently, in addition to the traditional physical evaluations, it has been recommended the inclusion of functional tests to evaluate the movement pattern of individuals.
Objective: To assess the functional performance of women and men participating of RT.
Methods: Fifty-seven participants (27 women, 26.2 ± 5.1 years old; and 30 men, 26.3 ± 5.8 years old), who are physically active and experienced in RT, were assessed through the use of Functional Movement Screen (FMS®). The total score was compared between the genders using the Mann-Whitney U test, and the distribution of the partial scores (scores of individual tests) and the proportion of asymmetric scores between groups was performed through the Chi-Square test (p < 0.05).
Results: Women and men presented, respectively, a total score of 14.6 ± 1.5 and 15.3 ± 1.4 points, and there was no significant difference between genders. Considering the partial scores, men performed better in the trunk stability (p = 0.001) and deep squat (p = 0.024) tests, while women presented higher scores in the shoulder mobility test (p = 0.001). In the latter, besides presenting worse results, men were significantly more asymmetrical (p = 0.002).
Conclusions: The results of this study suggest the necessity of a more detailed observation of the partial scores in order to plan personalized training programs that consider the participants’ individual needs.
Downloads
References
Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, et al. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: Guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334–59.
Pitanga F. Testes, medidas e avaliação em educação física e esportes. São Paulo: Phorte; 2008.
Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 2. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006;1(3):132–9.
Cook G. Movement Functional Movement Systems: Screening, Assessment and Corrective Strategies. Santa Cruz, CA: On Target Publications; 2010.
Bunn P dos S, Lopes TJA, Terra B de S, Costa HF, Souza MP, Braga RM, et al. Association between movement patterns and risk of musculoskeletal injuries in navy cadets: A cohort study. Phys Ther in Sport. 2021;52:81–9.
Abraham A, Sannasi R, Nair R. Normative values for the functional movement screentm in adolescent school aged children. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(1):29–36.
Bardenett SM, Micca JJ, DeNoyelles JT, Miller SD, Jenk DT, Brooks GS. Functional Movement Screen normative values and validity in high school athletes: can the FMSTM be used as a predictor of injury? Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(3):303–8.
Bushman TT, Grier TL, Canham-Chervak M, Anderson MK, North WJ, Jones BH. The Functional Movement Screen and injury risk: association and predictive value in active men. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(2):297–304.
Carsten Junior MM, Beck JA da, Silva ACK, Sanchotene CG, da Silva da Rosa R, Ruschel C. Desempenho funcional de atletas de atletismo, natação e remo com a Functional Movement Screen (FMS®). Rev Inspirar Mov & Saúde. 2020;(2):1-18.
Fox D, O’Malley E, Blake C. Normative data for the Functional Movement ScreenTM in male Gaelic field sports. Phys Ther Sport. 2014 Aug;15(3):194–9.
Garrison M, Westrick R, Johnson MR, Benenson J. Association between the functional movement screen and injury development in college athletes. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(1):21–8.
Kiesel K, Plisky PJ, Voight ML. Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a preseason functional movement screen? N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2007;2(3):147–58.
Mitchell UH, Johnson AW, Vehrs PR, Feland JB, Hilton SC. Performance on the Functional Movement Screen in older active adults. J Sport Health Sci. 2016;5(1):119–25.
Schneiders AG, Davidsson Å, Hörman E, Sullivan PSJ. Functional movement screen tm normative values in a young, active population. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011;6(2):75–82.
Davies KF, Sacko RS, Lyons MA, Duncan MJ. Association between Functional Movement Screen Scores and athletic performance in adolescents: a systematic review. Vol. 10, Sports. 2022;10(3):28.
Lee M, Youm C, Noh B, Park H. Low composite functional movement screen score associated with decline of gait stability in young adults. PeerJ. 2021;30;9:e11356.
Dietze-Hermosa MS, Montalvo S, Gonzalez MP, Dorgo S. Association between the modified functional movement screen scores, fear of falling, and self-perceived balance in active older adults. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2021;37(2):64–73.
Tafuri S, Notarnicola A, Monno A, Ferretti F, Moretti B. CrossFit athletes exhibit high symmetry of fundamental movement patterns . A cross-sectional study. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016;6(1):157–60.
Teyhen DS, Shaffer SW, Lorenson CL, Halfpap JP, Donofry DF, Walker MJ, et al. The Functional Movement Screen: a reliability study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(6):530–40.
Parenteau-G E, Gaudreault N, Chambers S, Boisvert C, Grenier A, Gagné G, et al. Functional movement screen test: A reliable screening test for young elite ice hockey players. Phys Ther Sport. 2014;15(3):169–75.
Del Vecchio F, Gondim D, Arruda A. Functional Movement Screening performance of brazilian jiu-jitsu athletes from Brazil: differences considering practice time and combat style. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(8):2341–7.
Barnes CJ, Van Steyn SJ, Fischer RA. The effects of age, sex, and shoulder dominance on range of motion of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10(3):242–6.
Roy JS, Macdermid JC, Boyd KU, Faber KJ, Drosdowech D, Athwal GS. Rotational strength, range of motion, and function in people with unaffected shoulders from various stages of life. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2009;1:4.
Kiesel KB, Butler RJ, Plisky PJ. Prediction of injury by limited and asymmetrical fundamental movement patterns in american football players. J Sport Rehabil. 2014;23(2):88–94.
Leetun DT, Ireland ML, Willson JD, Ballantyne BT, Davis IM. Core stability measures as risk factors for lower extremity injury in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(6):926–34.
Bliven KC, Anderson BE. Core stability training for injury prevention. Sports Health. 2013;5(6):514–22.
Nuzzo JL. Narrative review of sex differences in muscle strength, endurance, activation, size, fiber type, and strength training participation rates, preferences, motivations, injuries, and neuromuscular adaptations. J Strength Cond Res. 2023;37(2):494-536.
Preto JMS, Ferreira AO, Martins JB. Agachamento Profundo: Uma Análise Sistemática. Rev Bras Prescr Fisiol Exerc. 2014;8:445–52.
Clark MA, Lucett SC. NASM Essentials of Corrective Exercise Training. Clark MA, Lucett SC, editors. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 ConScientiae Saúde
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do texto na revista;
O(s) autor(es) garantem que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, idéias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder a ajustes textuais e de adequação às normas da publicação;
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional;
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado;
Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.
