Desempenho de repetições e tempo sob tensão no método Cluster Sets vs. tradicional em uma sessão de treinamento de força

Anderson Correa Dantes; Juan Câmara Pinheiro; Marianna de Freitas Maia; Gabriel Andrade Paz; Igor Nasser; Humberto Miranda

doi:10.5585/conssaude.v18n1.8756

Authors

Anderson Correa Dantes
Juan Câmara Pinheiro
Marianna de Freitas Maia
Gabriel Andrade Paz
Igor Nasser Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Humberto Miranda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/conssaude.v18n1.8756

Keywords:

Resistance Training. Exercise. Performance.

Abstract

Introduction: Cluster sets (CLS) comes up a resistance training (RT) method that includes short intraset rest intervals. Objective: investigate acute performance in multiple sets in the CLS method vs. traditional (TRAD) Methods: 14 men trained in RT participated in this study. Subjects performed two distinct protocols: TRAD – three sets of eigth repetitions with 90% of 8 repetition maximum (RM) and two minutes rest inteval; CLS – three sets of eigth repetitions with 90% of eigth repetitions, with intraset rest of 30 seconds every two repetitions. Results: CLS method was able to maintain performance throughout sets, without significant reductions in sets 2 and 3, in both exercises. Compared to TRAD, total repetitions performed were significantly higher than for CLS than TRAD (p ≤ 0,05). Conclusion: CLS provided greater total repetitions performed compared to TRAD. No significant differences were observed for time under tension between protocols.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Igor Nasser, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Treinamento de força, variáveis de treinamento, fisiologia do exercício, bioquímica do exercício

References

Schoenfeld BJ, Peterson MD, Ogborn D, Contreras B, Sonmez GT. Effects of low- vs. high-load resistance training on muscle strength and hypertrophy in well-trained men. J of Strength and Cond Res 2015a;29(10):1954-1963.

Harries SK, Lubans DR, Callister R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of linear and undulating periodized resistance training programs on muscular strength. J of Strength and Cond Res 2015;29(4):1113-1125.

Williams TD, Tolusso DV, Fedewa MV, Esco MR. Comparison of periodized and non-periodized resistance training on maximal strength: a meta-analysis. Sports Med 2017;47(10):2083-2100.

Tufano JJ, Brown LE, Haff G. Theoretical and practical aspects of different cluster sets structures: a systematic review. J of Stength and Cond Res 2016;31(3):848-867.

Tufano JJ, Conlon JA, Nimphius S, Oliver JM, Kreutzer A, Haff G. Different cluster sets results in similar metabolic, endocrine, and perceptual responses in trained men. J of Strength and Cond Res 2017; 33(2):346-354.

Nicholson G, Ispoglou T, Bissas A. The impact of repetitions mechanics on the adaptation resulting from strength-, hypertrophy- and cluster-type resistance training. Eur J of Appl Physiol 2016;116(10):1875-1888.

Iglesias-Soler E, Carballeira E, Sánchez-Otero T, Mayo X, Fernández-del-Omo M. Performance of maximum repetitions with cluster-set configuration. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2014;9(4):637-642.

Xian M, Eliseo IS, Derek KJ. Perceived exertion is affected by the submaximal set configuration used in resistance training. J of Strength and Cond Res 2017; 33(2):426-432.

Schoenfeld BJ, Pope ZK, Benik FM, Hester GM, Sellers J, Nooner JL, et al. Longer interest rest periods enhance muscle strength and hypertrophy in resistance-trained men. J of Strength and Cond Res 2015b;30(7):1805-1812.

Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn DI, Krieger JW. Effect of repetition duration during resistance training on muscle hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2015;45(4):577-585.

American College of Sports Medicine. Position stand: Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Medicine and Science in Sports Medicine 2011;42(3):11341359.

Schoenfeld BJ, Ratamess NA, Peterson MD, Contreras B, Tiryaki-Sonmez G. Influence of resistance training frequency on muscular adaptations in well-trained men. J of Strength and Cond Res 2015c;29(7):1821-1829.

Paz GA, Robbins DW, de Oliveira CG, Bottaro M, Miranda H. Volume load and neuromuscular fatigue during an acute bout of agonist-antagonist paired-set versus traditional-set training. J of Strength and Cond Res 2017;31(10):2777-2784.

Miranda H, Figueiredo T, Rodrigues B, Paz GA, Simão R. Influence of exercise order on repetition performance among all possible combinations on resistance training. Res Sports Med 2013;21(4):355-366.

Oliver JM, Kreutzer A, Jenke S, Phillips MD, Mitchell JB, Jones MT. Acute response to cluster sets in trained and untrained men. Eur J of Appl Physiol 2015a;115(11):2383-2393.

Oliver JM, Kreutzer A, Jenke SC, Phillips MD, Mitchell MB, Jones MT. Velocity drives greater power observed during back squat using cluster sets. J of Strength and Cond Res 2015b;30(1):235-243.

Figueiredo VC, de Salles BF, Trajano GS. Volume for muscle hypertrophy and health outcomes: the most effective variable in resistance training. Sports Med 2018;48(3):499-505.

Radaelli R, Fleck SJ, Leite T, Leite RD, Pinto RS, Fernandes L, Simão R. Dose-response of 1, 3, and 5 sets of resistance training on strength, local muscular endurance, and hypertrophy. J of Strength and Cond Res 2015;29(5):1349-1358.

García-Ramos A, Padial P, Haff G, Argüelles-Cienfuegos J, García-Ramos M, Conde-Pipó, et al. Effect of different interrepetition rest periods on barbell velocity loss during ballistic bench press exercise. J of Strength and Cond Res 2015;29(9):2388-2396.

Oliver JM, Jagim AR, Sanchez AC, Mardock MA, Kelly KA, Meredith HJ, et al. Greater gains in strength and power with intraset rest interval in hypertrophic training. J of Strength and Cond Res 2013;27(11):3116-3131.