Management of engineering project teams in matrix structure organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v14i1.23637Keywords:
Team management, resource allocation, Feedback. Engagement, Servant leadership, Integration, Project teams, Matrix structure.Abstract
The objective of this work was to identify and propose integrated solutions for the main problems related to team management in an engineering project consulting organization with a matrix structure. A case study was developed in an organization that included document analysis and participatory observation of three projects developed with shared teams. In addition, a questionnaire was applied to part of the members of the engineering and projects department. The perception of those directly involved in project development on some aspects of team management was observed: functioning of the matrix structure, allocation of resources, management and functioning of teams, training and lessons learned. It was found that the organization has characteristics of the three types of matrix structures: weak, moderate and strong. Several team management problems in these structures were observed: conflict over resources, double subordination, low engagement, difficulties in allocation and team development. The main integrated solutions were related to leveling knowledge about the structure and its functioning, managing the engagement of those involved, increasing integration between project and functional teams, providing feedback and recording lessons learned in projects, in addition to indicating the server profile for members of the project management team.
References
Carrillo, P., Ruikar, K., & Fuller, P. (2013). When will we learn? Improving lessons learned practice in construction. International Journal of Project Management. 31(4): 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.10.005
Carvalho, M. M., Rabechini Jr, R. (2019). Fundamentos em gestão de projetos: construindo competências para gerenciar projetos. 5ª ed. Atlas. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Davis, SM, & Lawrence, PR (1977). Matrix, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Duffield, S., & Whitty, S. J. (2015). Developing a systemic lessons learned knowledge model for organisational learning through projects. International journal of project management, 33(2), 311-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.07.004
Ebert, R., & Griffin, R. (2017). Business Essentials – global edition. 10. Ed. Pearson Education. Columbia, Carolina do Sul, EUA.
El Talla, S. A., Al Shobaki, M. J., Abu-Naser, S. S., & Amuna, Y. M. A. (2018). Organizational structure and its relation to the prevailing pattern of communication in Palestinian universities. International Journal of Engineering and Information Systems, 2(5), 22–43
Engwall, M., Jerbrant, A. (2002). The resource allocantion syndrome: the prime challenge of muilt-project management? International Journal of Project Management. 1(1): 403-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00113-8
Ferrada, X., Núñez, D., Neyem, A., Serpell, A., & Sepúlveda, M. (2016). A Lessons-learned System for Construction Project Management: A Preliminary Application. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 226 (1): 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.192
Galbraith, JR (2002). Designing Organizations, San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Hassan, M. M.; Bashir, S.; Abbas, S. M. (2017). The impact of project managers’ personality on projet success in NGOs: the mediating role of transformation leadership. Project Management Journal. 48 (2): 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281704800206
Hobday, M. (2000). The project-based organisation: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems?. Research policy, 29(7-8), 871-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00110-4
Kishore, N., Pretorius, J. H. C., & Chattopadhyay, G. (2019). The Roles of Functional Managers and Project Managers in a Matrix Organization. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) (pp. 784-788). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM44572.2019.8978830
Knight, K (1977). Matrix Management, New York: PBI
Kuprenas, J. A. (2003). Implementation and performance of a matrix organization structure. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00065-5
Kwasnicka, E. L. (2004). Introdução à administração. 6ª ed. Atlas, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Larson, E. W., & Gobeli, D. H. (1987). Matrix management: Contradictions and insights. California management review, 29(4), 126-138. https://doi.org/10.2307/4116213
Lino, L. C. J.; Silva, J. H. (2011). Liderança servidora no aspecto do líder servidor com perfil procurado pela organização. FACUNICAMPS, Goiânia, GO, Brasil.
Love, P. E. D., Teo, P., Davidson, M., Cumming, S., & Morrison, J. (2016). Building absorptive capacity in an alliance: Process improvement through lessons learned. International Journal of Project Management. 34(7): 1123–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.010
Marconi, Marina de Andrade; Lakatos, Eva Maria (1999). Técnicas de pesquisa. 4. ed. Atlas. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Maximiano, A. C. A. (2002). Teoria geral da administração: da revolução urbana à revolução digital. 3ª ed. Atlas. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Missel, Simoni. (2016). Feedback corporativo: Como saber se está indo bem. Benvirá. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Moreira, H. (2008). Metodologia da pesquisa para o professor pesquisador. 2.ed. Lamparina. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Oliveira, G. L.; Kiperstok, A.; Kalid R. A.; Esquerre, K. P. S.; Sales E. A. (2016). Metodologia TECLIM para uso racional de água na indústria: o banco de ideias no contexto da metodologia front‑end loading. Revista Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental. 21 (4): 753-764. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-41522016109240
Patah, L., Carvalho, M. M. (2002). Estruturas de gerenciamento de projetos e competência em equipes de projetos. In: Enegep 22, 2002, Curitiba, Porto Alegre, Brasil. Anais... p. 1-8.
Pinho, E. C. S. N., Kilimnik, Z. M., & Andrade, D. F. (2015). A influência da estrutura matricial no comprometimento com a carreira em comparação com a estrutura tradicional: um estudo de caso na Emater-MG. REGE-Revista de Gestão, 22(2), 223-239. https://doi.org/10.5700/rege560
Project Management Institute [PMI]. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). 6ed. Project Management Institute, Philadelphia, PA, EUA.
Robbins, Stephen P; Judge, Timothy A.; Sobral, Filipe. (2010). Comportamento Organizacional: teoria e prática no contexto brasileiro. 14ª ed. Pearson Prentice Hall. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Sy, T., Beach, L., & D’Annunzio, L. S. (2005). Challenges and strategies of matrix organizations. Human Resource Planning, 28(1), 39-48.
Sydow, J., & Braun, T. (2018). Projects as temporary organizations: An agenda for further theorizing the interorganizational dimension. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.012
Terribili, A. F. (2010). Indicadores de Gerenciamento de projetos. Monitoração contínua. 1ª ed. M. Books do brasil Ltda. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Vantrappen, H., & Wirtz, F. (2016). Making matrix organizations actually work. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/03/making-matrix-organizations-actually-work?autocomplete=true
Veelen, R. V.; Ufkes, E. G. (2019). Teaming up or down? A multisource study on the role of team identification and learning in the team diversity–performance link. Group & Organization Management. 44(1): 38-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601117750532
Yin, R. K. (2015). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 5. ed. Bookman. Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dos autores
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.