Gerenciamento de projetos de sustentabilidade
Novo modelo de classificação
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v15i1.25461Palavras-chave:
Organizações baseadas em projetos, Organizações suportadas por projetos, SustentabilidadeResumo
Sustainability issues are becoming one of the most important project categories in distinct business sectors, levels of public administration and countries. This theoretical essay, still under initial development, proposes a new typology based in two dimensions that affect sustainability and project management. The first dimension is the “by the project” and “of the project” division. The sustainability “by” refers to how sustainability is directly included in the project scope, so projects that will deliver sustainable results. In the other hand, sustainability “of” the project mean that all project management processes will follow sustainability procedures. The second dimension is the dichotomy between PBO – Project based organizations and PSO – Project supported organizations. For the Project Based Organizations, the projects are the core business of that kind of organizations, so the earnings and profits are direct consequences of successful project execution and new contracts. Whereas for the Project Supported Organization, projects are related to future operations, products and services, so they are investments or expenses. Finally, a ten-question research agenda is proposed addressing the relevant aspects, both in theoretical and practitioners’ visions for sustainability project management.
Referências
Ansoff, H I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 113-124.
Bizarrias, F., Penha, R., & Silva, L. (2021). Value and projects: Contributions under marketing perspective. Revista de Gestão e Projetos (GeP), 12(2), 1-8.
Cattani, G., Ferriani, S., Frederiksen, L., & Täube, J. (2011). Project-based organizing and strategic management: A long-term research agenda on temporary organizational forms. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Cornelissen, J. (2017). Editor’s comments: Developing propositions, a process model, or a typology? Addressing the challenges of writing theory without a boilerplate. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 1–9.
Einhorn, B. & Sano, N. (2023). The World´s Love Affair with Japanese cars is Souring. Business Week, Jan 05. Available at https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-01-06/toyota-nissan-risk-status-loss-as-tesla-vw-byd-top-global-electric-car-market.
Freedman, B. (2016). Environmental Science: A Canadian Perspective. Halifax, Canada, Dalhousie University Libraries.
Friedrich, K. (2023). A systematic literature review concerning the different interpretations of the role of sustainability in project management. Management Review Quarterly, 73(1): 31-60.
Fuenfschilling, L. (2019). An institutional perspective on sustainability transitions. In Boons, F. & A. McMeekin (eds.) Handbook of Sustainable Innovation, Edgard Elgar Publishing, 219-237.
Gareis, R., Huemann, M. & Martinuzzi, A. (2013). Project management & Sustainable development principles. Newtown Square, USA: Project Management Institute.
Gasparro, K., Zerjav, V., Konstantinou, E. & Cassady, C. (2022). Vanguard Projects as Intermediation Spaces in Sustainability Transitions. Project Management Journal, 53(2), 196-210.
Geraldi, J, & Söderlund, J. (2018). Project studies: What is it, where it is going. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 55-70.
He, Qinghua, Wang, Z., Xie, J. & Chen, Z. (2022). The Dark Side of Environmental Sustainability in Projects: Unraveling Greenwashing Behaviors. Project Management Journal, 53(4), 349-366.
Hermano, V. & Martín-Cruz, N. (2020). The project-based firm: A theoretical framework for building dynamic capabilities. Sustainability, 12(16), 6639.
Huemann, M. & Silvius, G. (2017). Projects to create the future: Managing projects meets sustainable development. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1066-1070.
Islam, M. & Huda, N. (2018). Reverse logistics and closed-loop chain of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)/E-waste: A comprehensive literature review. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 137(1), 48-75.
Jaakkola. E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1): 18-26.
Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(3), 49-62.
Jacobson, M., Lundin, R. & Söderholm, A. (2015). Researching Projects and Theorizing Families of Temporary Organizations. Project Management Journal, 46(1), 9-18.
Kemp, René. (1994). Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability. Futures, 26(10): 1023-1046.
Locatelli, G. et al (2022). A Manifesto for Project Management Research. European Management Review, 20(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12568
Lundin, R. (2016). Project society: paths and challenges. Project Management Journal, 47(4):7-15.
Lundin, R. & Söderholm, A. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 437-455.
Lundin, Rolf et al. (2015). Managing Work in Project Society: Institutional Challenges of temporary Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mansell, P. & Philbin, S. (2022). Measuring Sustainable Development Goal Targets on Infrastructure projects. Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 23(8), 1-22.
Markard, J., Raven, R. & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6):955-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
Martens, M. & Carvalho, M. (2016). The challenge of introducing sustainability into project management function: multiple-case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 117(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.039
Mella, P. & Pellicelli, M. (2017). How Myopia Archetypes Lead to Non-Sustainability. Sustainability, 10(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010021
Miterev, M., Mancini, M. & Turner, R. (2017). Towards a design for the project-based organization. International Journal of Project Management, 35(4), 479-491.
Müller, R., Drouin, N. & Sankaran, S. (2019). Modeling Organizational Project Management. Project Management Journal, 50(4), 449-513. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819847876
Ovaere, M. & Proost, S. (2021). Cost-Effective Reduction of Fossil Energy use in the European Transport Sector: An Assessment of the Fit For 55 Package. Working paper, Ghent University. Available at https://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_21_1031.pdf
Reeves, M. & Venema, T. (2014). The Growth Share Matrix Perspectives. Available at https://www.bcg.com/publications/2014/growth-share-matrix-bcg-classics-revisited
Rego, M, Irigaray, H. & Chaves, R, (2017). Symbolic Megaprojects: Historical Evidence of a forgotten Dimension. Project Management Journal, 48(6), 17-28.
Sabini, L. & Alderman, N. (2021). The Paradoxical Profession: Project Management and the Contradictory Nature of Sustainable Project Objectives, Project Management Journal, 52(4), 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697282110076
Sabini, L., Muzio, D. and Alderman, N. (2019). 25 years of ‘sustainable projects’. What we know and what the literature says. International Journal of Project Management, 37(8),820-838.
Sankaran, S., Müller, R. and Drouin, N. (2020). Creating a ‘sustainability sublime’ to enable megaprojects to meet the United Nations sustainable development goals. System Research and Behavioral Sciences, 37(6), 813-826. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2744
Silva, L, Bizarrias, F., Penha, R. and Larieira, C. (2023). The future of Project Management. Revista Gestão e Projetos, chamada especial 2023. Available at: https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/chamaesp2023 .
Silvius, A., Schipper, R., Planko, J. van der Brink, J. and Kölher, A. (2012). Sustainability in Project Management, Gower Publishing.
Söderlund, J. (2015). Project-Based Organizations: What Are They? In: Chiocchio, F, Kelloway, E. and B. Hobbs, (Eds.) The Psychology and management of Project Teams. Oxford: Oxford university Press, 2015.
Toljaga-Nikolić, D., Todorović, M., Dobrota, M., Obradović, T., and Obradović, V. (2020). Project management and sustainability: Playing trick or treat with the planet. Sustainability, 12(20), 8619. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208619
Wang, G., Wu, P., Wu, X., Zhang, H., Guo, Q. and Cai, Y. (2020). Mapping global research on sustainability of megaproject management: A scientometric review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 259(2), 1-12.
Whitley, R., (2006). Project-based firms: New organizational form or variations on a theme. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(2), 77-90.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2024 Marcos Lopez Rego, José Ernesto Mattoso Faillace Junior
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do texto na da revista;
O(s) autor(es) garantem que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, idéias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder a ajustes textuais e de adequação às normas da publicação.
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição - Não comercial - Compartilhar igual 4.0 Internacional que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) em http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
