Geopolitical analysis of the new scenario in the bidding process for the host cities of the olympic games

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/podium.v12i3.24140

Keywords:

Olympic games, Geopolitics, IOC

Abstract

Study Objective: To analyze the new conjuncture in the process for bidding to be the host city of the Summer or Winter Olympic Games.
Methodology/Approach: Taking the 1990s as an initial reference point, this qualitative and exploratory research has been conducted, entailing the analysis and synthesis of data and information from secondary sources. The research extensively involves scrutinizing academic articles, books, news reports, and sources published on specialized websites.
Originality/Relevance: The hosting of the Games and the demands imposed by the IOC have been increasingly criticized. A rise in the number of referendums with local inhabitants of bidding cities has resulted in applications being withdrawn throughout the selection process.
Main Results: The results indicate that the new geopolitical scenario has significant implications for the bidding process for the Olympics. An unusual scenario ensues in the geopolitical environment of the Olympics, promoting not only changes in the profile of candidates, but also institutional changes within the IOC itself.
Theoretical/methodological contributions: It can provide a better understanding of the complex relationship between politics, power, and sports events. The research can help to identify key variables that impact the selection process, which can then be further investigated through quantitative studies.
Social/Management Contribution: The research can shed light on the impact of the selection process on society, including its economic, political, and social consequences. It can also inform the decision-making process of the IOC and other stakeholders involved.

CROSSMARK_Color_horizontal.svg

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

César Teixeira Castilho, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – UFMG

Professor Adjunto A (Nível 1) da EEFFTO/UFMG; Professor Visitante da Université de Paris-Sud (Paris 11) - Mestrado em "Management du Sport: Politiques Publiques et Stratégies des Organisations"; Pós-Doutor "Estudos do Lazer" (EEFFTO/UFMG); Pós-Doutor "Sociologia" (UFPR); Doutor em "Sciences du Sport et du Mouvement Humain" (Université de Paris 11); Título de Doutor Reconhecido pela EEFE-USP "Doutor em Educação Física e Esporte" na área de "Estudos Socioculturais e Comportamentais da Educação Física e Esporte"; Mestrado em Teorias do Lazer (EEFFTO-UFMG); Especialização em "Fisiologia do Exercício" (FM-USP); Aperfeiçoamento em "Reabilitação Cardíaca" (EEFE-USP); Graduação Plena em Educação Física (EEFFTO-UFMG); Pesquisas voltadas para a Saúde Coletiva; Geopolítica do Esporte; Psicologia do Esporte; Estudos do Lazer; Sociologia do Esporte; Metodologia e Métodos de Pesquisa. 

Cléber Dias, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – UFMG

Graduado em Educação Física (Universidade Castelo Branco), Mestre em História Comparada (UFRJ) e Doutor em Educação Física (UNICAMP). É professor da UFMG onde leciona nos cursos de graduação em Educação Física, Terapia Ocupacional e Turismo. Leciona também no curso de pós-graduação interdisciplinar em Estudos do Lazer e coordena o Grupo de Pesquisa em História do Lazer (Hisla), dedicado a estudos sobre a história do lazer e sobre a formação de mercados de entretenimento e consumo cultural. Foi diretor da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Lazer (2014-2016), editor chefe da Revista Pensar a Prática (2009-2013) e editor associado da Revista Recorde (2010-2020). É autor ou organizador de mais de 10 livros, além de mais de 70 artigos em periódicos acadêmicos nacionais ou internacionais. Dentre seus trabalhos, encontram-se os livros “Esportes nos confins da civilização: Goiás e Mato Grosso, c. 1866-1936” (Editora 7 letras, 2018), “Epopeias em dias de prazer: uma história do lazer na natureza, 1779-1838” (Editora da UFG, 2013) e “Em favor do cotidiano: lazer e políticas culturais em Goiânia” (Editora da PUC-GO, 2011).

References

Allison, L., & Monnington, T. (2002). Sport, Prestige and International Relations. Government and Opposition 37 (1): 106-134. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44482975.

Arnaud, P., & Riordan, J. (org.). (2013). Sport and International Politics: Impact of Facism and Communism on Sport. Nova York / Londres: Taylor & Francis.

Ayhan, K. Korea’s Soft Power and Public Diplomacy. (2017). Seoul: Seoul National University Press.

Baade, R. A., & Matheson, V. (2016). Going for the Gold: The Economics of the Olympics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (2): 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.2.201.

Boniface, P. (2016). JO Politiques: Sport et relations internacionales. Groupe Eyrolles: Paris.

Booth, D. (2011). Olympic city bidding: an exegesis of power. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 46 (4): 367-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690211408844.

Bourbillères, H., & Koebel, M. (2020). Les processus de contestation dans le cadre des candidatures des villes européennes aux Jeux olympiques et paralimpiques 2024. Movement & Sport Sciences – Science & Motricité 107: 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2019032.

Brannagan, P. M. & Giulianotti, R. (2014). Qatar, Global Sport, and the 2022 FIFA World Cup. In: Leveraging Legacies from Sports Mega-Events, edited by Jonathan Grix. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Castilho, C. T., & Marchi Jr., W. (2019). Esporte, Geopolítica e Relacões Internacionais. In: Esporte e Sociedade: um olhar a partir da globalização, edited by Marco Betine and Gustavo Luis Gutierrez, 15-32. São Paulo: IEA-USP.

Castilho, C. T., & Marchi Jr., W. (2021). Esporte, geopolítica e relações internacionais. Fulia/UFMG 5(2): 240-257. https://doi.org/10.35699/25264494.2020.20385

De Bosscher, V. et al. (2007). The Global Sporting Arms Race. An International Comparative Study on Sports Policy Factors Leading to International Sporting Success. Aachen: Meyer and Meyer Spots.

Dempsey, C. & Zimbalist, A. S. (2017). No Boston Olympics: how and why smart cities are passing on the torch. Lebanon NH: ForeEdge.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3º Edition. New York: Sage Publication.

Falcous, M., & Johnson, H. (2015). Sport mega-events and soft power: instantiations of national identity. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 39 (4), pp. 290-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2013.827632.

Flyvbjerg, B., Budzier, A., & Lunn, D. (2020). Regression to the tail: Why the Olympics blow up. EPA: Economy and Space 53(2): 233-260. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3686009.

Freeman K. (2012). Sport as swaggering: Utilizing sport as soft power. Sport in Society 15(9): 1260-1274. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2012.690403.

Goldblatt, D. (2016). The Games: a global history of the Olympics. Norton & Company: New York.

Grix, J., & Carmichael, F. (2012). Why do governments invest in elite sports? A polemic. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics. 4(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2011.627358.

Grix, J., & Lee, D. Soft Power, Sports Mega-Events and Emerging Countries States: The Lure of the Politics of Attraction. Global Society. 27(4), 521-536. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2013.827632

Grix, J. (2017). Sport as soft power in contemporary international relations. In: Sugden, John, and Alan Tomlinson (eds.), Power, Politics and International Events: Socio-cultural Analyses of Festivals and Spectacles. Routledge, 91-106.

Hansen, R. S. (2012). Vikingskipet vil svekke OL-søknaden, Afteposten, February 22. Accessed 20 February 2022. Disponível em: https://www.aftenposten.no/sport/i/8m5b8Q/ndash-vikingskipet-vil-svekke-ol-soeknaden

Haut, J., Prohl, R., & Emrich, E. (2016). Nothing but medals? Attitudes towards the importance of olympic success. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 51(3): 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690214526400.

Houlihan, B. (1997). Sport, Policy and Politics: A Comparative Analysis. Londres / Nova York: Routledge.

Horne, J. (2007). The four ‘Knows’ of Sports Mega-Events. Leisure Studies. 26(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360500504628.

Horne, J. (2018). Understanding the denial of abuses of human rights connected to sports mega-events. Leisure Studies. 37(1), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2017.1324512.

Hulme, D. (1990). The Political Olympics: Moscow, Afghanistan, and the 1980 US Boycott. Westport: Ed. Praeger, 1990.

Human Rights Watch. Sophie Richarrdson: China Director. (2022). Human Rights Watch Web Site. Disponível em: https://www.hrw.org/about/people/sophie-richardson Acesso em: 21 de fevereiro 2022.

IOC. (2020). Olympic Charter. Lausanne: DidWedo Ed. Accessed 16 February 2022. https://stillmed.olympic.org/media/Document%20Library/OlympicOrg/General/EN-Olympic-Charter.pdf#_ga=2.248657799.1871592072.1592319729-1875299761.1583814696

IOC. (2013). “Rising interest in Olympic Winter Games as six cities bid to host 2022 Games.” IOC. November 13, Accessed 15 February 2022. Disponível em: https://olympics.com/ioc/news/rising-interest-in-olympic-winter-games-as-six-cities-bid-to-host-2022-games.

Kaynak, E. (2015). The political impact of international sports events: The cases of the Istanbul Olympic bids. In A. Tomlinson, C. Young, & R. Holt (Eds.), Sport and the transformation of modern Europe: States, media, and markets 1950-2010. New York: Routledge. 175-191.

Krüger, A. (1995). ‘Buying victories is positively degrading’: European origins of government pursuit of national prestige through sport. The International Journal of the History of Sport. 12 (2), 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523369508713902.

Larneby, M. (2021). The Olympic Games – A Critical Approach. European Journal for Sport and Society 18(1): 98-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2020.1839707.

Lauermann, J. (2022). The declining appeal of mega-events in entrepreneurial cities: From Los Angeles 1984 to Los Angeles 2028. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211066101

Le Monde (Sport). (2017). Le CIO se penche sur la double attribution des JO 2024 et 2028. Le Monde (Avec AFP), March 17. Accessed 22 February 2022. Disponível em: https://www.lemonde.fr/sport/article/2017/03/17/le-cio-se-penche-sur-la-double-attribution-des-jo-2024-et-2028_5096213_3242.html.

Lenskyj, H. J. (2020). The Olympic Games: A critical approach (Societynow). Londres: Emerald Publishing.

Matheson, V., & Baade, R. (2021). Rescuing the Olympic Games from their own success. FD International Monetary Fund. Accessed 16 February 2022. Disponível em: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2021/07/rescuing-the-tokyo-olympics-baade-matheson.htm

Murray, A. D. (2013). Soft power and sport mega-events: opportunities and challenges for Brazil, Russia, India, and China. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics. 5 (2), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2013.827632.

Nye, J. S. (1990). Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.

Nye, J. S. (2008). Power in the Global Information Age: From realism to globalization. New York/London: Routledge - Taylor and Francis Group.

Nye, J. S. (2011). The Future of Power. PublicAffairs.

Reicher, D. (2013). Nationensport und Mediennation. Zur Transformation von Nation und Nationalismus im Zeitalter elektronischer Massenmedien. Goettingen: V and R unipress.

Reid, S. M. (2022a). ‘The Genocide Olympics’: IOC human rights record under fire as Beijing games approach. East Bay Times (Sports Olympics). Accessed 20 February 2022. Disponível em: https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2022/02/03/the-genocide-olympics-ioc-human-rights-record-under-fire-as-beijing-games-approach/

Reid, S. M. (2022b). How Beijing got the Winter Olympics: The better of two bad choices. The Orange County Register (OCRegister). Accessed 20 February 2022. Disponível em: https://www.ocregister.com/2022/02/01/how-beijing-got-the-winter-olympics-the-better-of-two-bad-choices/.

Rugsveen, H. (2013). Hamars OL-drøm knuses: Ville arrangere skøyteløpene i Vikingskipet i 2022. Aftenposten. Accessed 20 February 2022. Disponível em: https://www.aftenposten.no/sport/i/4qbneo/hamars-ol-droem-knuses

Simson, V., & Jennings, A. (1992). Os Senhores dos Anéis: poder, dinheiro e drogas nas Olimpíadas Modernas. Rio de Janeiro: Best Seller.

Vandenberghe, P. PyeongChang 2018 and South Korea’s Strategic Use of Soft Power. (2017). In: AYHAN, Kadir (Org) Korea’s Soft Power and Public Diplomacy. Seoul: Seoul National University Press, 125-144.

Zhouxiang, L.; & Hong, F. (2018). Olympics in Conflict: From the Games of the New Emerging Forces do the Rio Olympcis. London: Routlegde. ISBN: 9781351181488. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351181488

Downloads

Published

2023-12-07

How to Cite

Castilho, C. T., & Dias, C. (2023). Geopolitical analysis of the new scenario in the bidding process for the host cities of the olympic games. PODIUM Sport, Leisure and Tourism Review, 12(3), 550–571. https://doi.org/10.5585/podium.v12i3.24140

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2023): set./dez.

Section

Artigos

License

Copyright (c) 2023 PODIUM Sport, Leisure and Tourism Review

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do texto na revista;

O(s) autor(es) garantem que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);

A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, idéias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);

É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder a ajustes textuais e de adequação às normas da publicação.

Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) em http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html