Um estudo comparativo entre métodos Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS no contexto de seleção de fornecedores

Igor Mansur Beleski; Francisco Rodrigues Lima Junior

doi:10.5585/2023.23218

Authors

Igor Mansur Beleski Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3131-3395
Francisco Rodrigues Lima Junior Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7053-5519

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/2023.23218

Keywords:

Supplier selection, Multicriteria decision making methods, Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS

Abstract

One of the ways to deal with the supplier selection process is the use of multicriteria decision-making methods. Among these, the Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) stands out for being an emerging method capable of supporting decision-making processes in situations of uncertainty and hesitancy. This study presents a comparison between two versions of this method applied in supplier selection and subsequent analysis of their characteristics, identifying advantages of use, differences and limitations. The application considered five alternatives, four criteria and two decision makers. The results show similarities between the supplier rankings produced by them and indicate that they are capable of supporting group decision problems, although they do not allow different weights to be assigned to the decision makers. The results of this study can be used to assist researchers and managers in choosing a decision method appropriate to their needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Igor Mansur Beleski, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná

É graduado em Administração pela Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR). É discente de mestrado no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração (PPGA - UTFPR).

Francisco Rodrigues Lima Junior, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná

É graduado em Engenharia de Produção com ênfase em Software pela Universidade Estadual de Maringá-PR (UEM), mestre e doutor em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade de São Paulo-SP (USP). Foi professor e coordenador do curso de Engenharia de Produção e Qualidade do Centro Universitário da Fundação Educacional Guaxupé-MG (UNIFEG). Atualmente é professor adjunto do Departamento de Gestão e Economia e professor permanente do Programa de Pós-graduação em Administração da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR). É coordenador do grupo de pesquisa Tomada de Decisão em Gestão de Operações, registrado no CNPQ. Possui experiência nas áreas de gestão da produção e qualidade, gestão de fornecimento, gestão de projetos, modelagem de processos, tomada de decisão multicritério e sistemas inteligentes. Pesquisa o uso de métodos de decisão multicritério e de inteligência artificial no apoio a problemas da área de gestão de operações.

References

Asgari, M.s., Abbasi, A., & Alimohamadlou, M. (2016). Comparison of ANFIS and FAHP-FGP methods for supplier selection. Kybernetes, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 474-489. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2014-0195

Beg, I., & Rashid, T. (2013). TOPSIS for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28(12), 1162-1171. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21623

Cauchick Miguel, P. A., Fleury, A., Mello, C. H. P., Nakano, D. N., Turrioni, J. B., Ho, L. L., ... & Pureza, V. (2010). Metodologia de pesquisa em engenharia de produção e gestão de operações. Rio de Janeiro: Elzevir.

Cevik Onar, S., Oztaysi, B., & Kahraman, C. (2014). Strategic decision selection using hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS and interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study. International Journal of Computational intelligence systems, 7(5), 1002-1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2014.964011

Dey, P. K., Bhattacharya, A., Ho, W., & Clegg, B. (2015). Strategic supplier performance evaluation: A case-based action research of a UK manufacturing organisation. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 192-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.021

Ertuğrul, İ., & Karakaşoğlu, N. (2008). Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(7), 783-795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1249-8

Ha, B. C., Park, Y. K., & Cho, S. (2011). Suppliers' affective trust and trust in competency in buyers: Its effect on collaboration and logistics efficiency. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 56-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111098744

Hlioui, R., Gharbi, A., & Hajji, A. (2017). Joint supplier selection, production and replenishment of an unreliable manufacturing-oriented supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.004

Igarashi, M., de Boer, L., & Fet, A. M. (2013). What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(4), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2013.06.001

Liao, H., & Xu, Z. (2015). Approaches to manage hesitant fuzzy linguistic information based on the cosine distance and similarity measures for HFLTSs and their application in qualitative decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(12), 5328-5336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.017

Junior, F. R. L., Osiro, L., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2014). A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied soft computing, 21, 194-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.014

Lima Junior, F. R., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2015). Uma comparação entre os métodos TOPSIS e Fuzzy-TOPSIS no apoio à tomada de decisão multicritério para seleção de fornecedores. Gestão & Produção, 22, 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X1190

Lima-Junior, F. R., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2016). A multicriteria approach based on fuzzy QFD for choosing criteria for supplier selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 101, 269-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.09.014

Liu, H., & Rodríguez, R. M. (2014). A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multicriteria decision making. Information Sciences, 258, 220-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.07.027

Mahmoud, M. R., & Garcia, L. A. (2000). Comparison of different multicriteria evaluation methods for the Red Bluff diversion dam. Environmental Modelling & Software, 15(5), 471-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00025-6

Matawale, C. R., Datta, S., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2016). Supplier selection in agile supply chain: Application potential of FMLMCDM approach in comparison with Fuzzy-TOPSIS and Fuzzy-MOORA. Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 23 No. 7, pp. 2027-2060. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2015-0067

Mosadeghi, R., Warnken, J., Tomlinson, R., & Mirfenderesk, H. (2015). Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 54-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.10.001

Pham, V. K., Wong, W. K., Moslehpour, M., & Musyoki, D. (2018). Simultaneous Adaptation of AHP and Fuzzy AHP to Evaluate Outsourcing Service in the East and Southeast Asia. Available at SSRN 3208130.

Rodríguez, R. M., Martı́nez, L., & Herrera, F. (2013). A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Information Sciences, 241, 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.04.006

Sarache Castro, W. A., Castrillón Gómez, Ó. D., & Ortiz Franco, L. F. (2009). Selección de proveedores: una aproximación al estado del arte. Cuadernos de administración, 22(38), 145-168.

Senvar, O., Otay, I., & Bolturk, E. (2016). Hospital site selection via hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(12), 1140-1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.656

Thrulogachantar, P., & Zailani, S. (2011). The influence of purchasing strategies on manufacturing performance: An empirical study in Malaysia. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 641-663. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410381111134482

Torra, V. (2010). Hesitant fuzzy sets. International journal of intelligent systems, 25(6), 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20418

Triantaphyllou, E., & Lin, C. T. (1996). Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision-making methods. international Journal of Approximate reasoning, 14(4), 281-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0888-613X(95)00119-2

Wu, C., & Barnes, D. (2010). Formulating partner selection criteria for agile supply chains: A Dempster–Shafer belief acceptability optimisation approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 125(2), 284-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.02.010

Wu, C., & Barnes, D. (2011). A literature review of decision-making models and approaches for partner selection in agile supply chains. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17(4), 256-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2011.09.002

Wu, C., & Barnes, D. (2012). A dynamic feedback model for partner selection in agile supply chains. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 79-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571211195745

Xu, Z., & Zhang, X. (2013). Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowledge-Based Systems, 52, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.05.011

Zimmer, K., Fröhling, M., & Schultmann, F. (2016). Sustainable supplier management–a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. International journal of production research, 54(5), 1412-1442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340

Zolfani, S. H., & Chatterjee, P. (2019). Comparative evaluation of sustainable design based on Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and Best Worst Method (BWM) methods: a perspective on household furnishing materials. Symmetry, 11(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11010074