Translation and validation in portuguese of the Leisure Constraints Scale (LCS)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/podium.v10i4.18835Keywords:
Leisure activity, Validation studies, Translation, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of resultsAbstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the content validity and translate the Leisure Constraints Scale (LCS) into Brazilian Portuguese.
Methodology: This is a cross-sectional research with a quantitative approach. Took place the processes of cross-cultural adaptation (translation and back-translation and technical revision), content validation (clarity of language, practical relevance and theoretical relevance), and reproducibility (test and retest), and, application of the finalized instrument. 180 workers participated in the analysis of reproducibility and 992 for internal consistency. In addition, there are eleven specialists in the area of leisure to participate in the validation of the instrument's content.
Originality / relevance: the study about leisure restrictions, although consolidated abroad, in Brazil needs conceptual deepening and a valid instrument. In this sense, this proposal comes to fill this gap and contribute to the strengthening of research on leisure in Brazil.
Main results: The authors attributed satisfactory values for content analysis in the items clarity and language (CVCt = 0.745), practical relevance (CVCt = 0.782) and theoretical relevance (X = 4.0; SD = 0.77). The reproducibility indices by intra-class correlation in test-retest were considered adequate in all domains of LCS (intrapersonal constraints = 0.780 - good, interpersonal constraints = 0.665 - regular, environmental constraints = 0.852 - great). In addition, Cronbach's Alpha presented a value of 0.621.
Theoretical methodological contributions: The Brazilian version of the Leisure Constraints Scale is a valid instrument for application in adult samples, presenting adequate psychometric indicators of validity, reproducibility, and internal consistency.
Downloads
References
Alahmad, M. E. (2016). Constraints and Motivations on the Participation of
Saudi Arabian High School Students in Physical Activity and Sport [Unpublished doctor’s thesis].Victoria University.
Alexandris, K., & Carroll, B. (1997). An analysis of leisure constraints based on different recreational sport participation levels: Results from a study in Greece. Leisure Sciences, 19(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409709512236
Balbinotti, M. A. A., ¨& Barbosa, M. L.L. (2008) Análise da consistência interna e fatorial confirmatório do IMPRAFE-126 com praticantes de atividades físicas gaúchos. Psico-USF, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-82712008000100002
Balcı, V., Özbek, O., Koçak, F., & Çeyiz, S. (2017). Development of the Bicycle Constraints Scale: Validity and reliability study. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(3), 2352-2363. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v14i3.4574
Bandura, A., Azzi, R. G., & Polydoro, S. A. (2009). Teoria social cognitiva : conceitos básicos. Artmed Editora.
Hawkins, B. A., Peng, J., Hsieh, C., Eki.Und, S. J. (1999). Leisure Constraints: A Replication and Extension of Construct Development. Leisure Sciences, 21(3), 179-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/014904099273066
Brasil. (2012). Resolução nº 466. Diário Oficial da União.
Casper, J. M., Bocarro, J. N., Kanters, M. A., & Floyd, M. F. (2011). Measurement Properties of Constraints to Sport Participation: A Psychometric Examination with Adolescents. Leisure Sciences, 33(2), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2011.550221
Crawford, D. W., & Godbey, G. (1987). Reconceptualizing barriers to family leisure. Leisure Sciences, 9(2), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408709512151
Crawford, D. W., Jackson, E. L., & Godbey, G. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13(4), 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409109513147
Dong, E., & Chick, G. (2012). Leisure Constraints in Six Chinese Cities. Leisure Sciences, 34(5), 417-435. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2012.714702
Field, A. (2009). Descobrindo a estatística usando o SPSS. Artemed.
Fiesc, Federação das Industrias do Estado de Santa Catarina. Portal Setorial FIESC. Retrieved May 19th 2017 from http://www.portalsetorialfiesc.com.br/informacoes-exclusivas/visualizar?id=957e33ea-8d3f-49b0-8c45-b3c59a2b7c23
Godbey, G., Crawford, D. W., & Shen, X. S. (2010). Assessing Hierarchical Leisure Constraints Theory after Two Decades. Journal of Leisure Research, 42(1), 111-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2010.11950197
Gürbüz, Bülent, & Karaküçük, S. (2007). Leisure Constraints Scale-28: Scale Development, Validity and Reability Study. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(1), 3-10. Disponível em: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/283474
He, L., Li, X., Harrill, R., & Cardon, P. W. (2014). Examining Japanese tourists' US-bound travel constraints. Current Issues in Tourism, 17(8), 705-722. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2012.749842
Herdman, M., Fox-Rushby, J., & Badia, X. (1998). A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach. Qual Life Res, 7(4), 323-335. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024985930536
Hernández-Nieto, R. A. (2002). Contributions to statistical analysis. Mérida: Universidad de Los Andes.
Hubbard, J., & Mannell, R. C. (2001). Testing Competing Models of the Leisure Constraint Negotiation Process in a Corporate Employee Recreation Setting. Leisure Sciences, 23(3), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/014904001316896846
Jackson, E. L. (2005). Leisure constraints research: Overview of a developing theme in leisure studies. In E.L. Jackson (ed.), Constraints to Leisure. State College, PA: Venture Publishing, 3-19.
Kay, T., & Jackson, G. (1991). Leisure Despite Constraint: The Impact of Leisure Constraints on Leisure Participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 23(4), 301-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1991.11969862
Kowalski, C. L., Grybovych, O., Lankford, S., & Neal, L. (2012). Examining constraints to leisure and recreation for residents in remote and isolated communities: an analysis of 14 communities in the Northwest Territories of Canada. World Leisure Journal, 54(4), 322-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/04419057.2012.720582
Kyle, G., & Jun, J. (2015). An alternate conceptualization of the leisure constraints measurement model: Formative structure? Journal of Leisure Research, 47(3), 337-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2015.11950364
Li, L., Chang, H.-J., Yeh, H.-I., Hou, C. J.-Y., Tsai, C.-H., & Tsai, J.-P. (2010). Factors Associated With Leisure Participation Among the Elderly Living in Long-term Care Facilities. International Journal of Gerontology, 4(2), 69-74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1873-9598(10)70026-0
Liechty, T., Freeman, P. A., & Zabriskie, R. B. (2006). Body Image and Beliefs About Appearance: Constraints on the Leisure of College-Age and Middle-Age Women. Leisure Sciences, 28(4), 311-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400600745845
Liu, H., & Walker, G. J. (2015). The Effects of Urbanization, Motivation, and Constraint on Chinese People's Leisure-Time Physical Activity. Leisure Sciences, 37(5), 458-478. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2015.1038372
Luiz, R. R., & Magnanini, M. M. F. (2000). The llgic of sample s¡ze determ¡natiln in epidemiological research. Cadernos de Saúde Coletiva, 8(2). Disponível em: http://www.cadernos.iesc.ufrj.br/cadernos/images/csc/2000_2/artigos/csc_v8n2_09-28.pdf
Lyu, S. O., & Oh, C.-O. (2014). Recreationists’ Constraints Negotiation Process for Continual Leisure Engagement. Leisure Sciences, 36(5), 479-497. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2014.920702
Marcellino, N. C. (2012). Estudos do lazer: uma introdução. Autores Associados: Campinas.
Miyake, M., & Rodgers, E. (2009). Interrelationship of Motivation for and Perceived Constraints to Physical Activity Participation and the Well-Being of Senior Center Participants. Proceedings of the 2008 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. GTR-NRS-P, 21-28.
Miyake, M., & Rodgers, E. (2014). Interrelationship of Motivation for and Perceived Constraints to Physical Activity Participation and the Well-Being of Senior Center Participants. In: Klenosky, David B.; Fisher, Cherie LeBlanc, eds. Proceedings of the 2008 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium; 2008; Bolton Landing, NY. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-42. Newtown Square, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 21-28.
Oh, S. S., Oh, S. Y., & Caldwell, L. (2002). The effects of perceived leisure constraints among Korean University students. Proceedings of the 2001 northeastern recreation research symposium, 183-187.
Raymore, L., Godbey, G., Crawford, D., & von Eye, A. (1993). Nature and process of leisure constraints: An empirical test. Leisure Sciences, 15(2), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409309513191
Raymore, L. A., Godbey, G. C., & Crawford, D. W. (1994). Self-Esteem, Gender, and Socioeconomic Status: Their Relation to Perceptions of Constraint on Leisure Among Adolescents. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(2), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1994.11969948
Son, J. S., Mowen, A. J., & Kerstetter, D. L. (2008). Testing Alternative Leisure Constraint Negotiation Models: An Extension of Hubbard and Mannell's Study. Leisure Sciences, 30(3), 198-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400802017308
Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol, 60(1), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
White, D. D. (2008). A structural model of leisure constraints negotiation in outdoor recreation. Leisure Sciences, 30(4), 342-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400802165131
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 PODIUM Sport, Leisure and Tourism Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do texto na revista;
O(s) autor(es) garantem que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, idéias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder a ajustes textuais e de adequação às normas da publicação.
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) em http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
