Technology transfer and urban issues: state of the art of the last ten years

Giovanni Luigi Ferreira Schiavon; Angelica Duarte Lima; Lou Grimmal; Serge Rohmer; Regina Negri Pagani

doi:10.5585/exactaep.2022.21870

Autores

Giovanni Luigi Ferreira Schiavon Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná / Curitiba, Paraná - Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6891-7435
Angelica Duarte Lima Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4466-7590
Lou Grimmal Universidade de Tecnologia de Troyes / Troyes, França https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8271-8133
Serge Rohmer Universidade de Tecnologia de Troyes / Troyes, França https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6162-615X
Regina Negri Pagani Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná / Curitiba, Paraná - Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2655-6424

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/exactaep.2022.21870

Palavras-chave:

technology transfer, urban planning, literature review

Resumo

This study reviews the last ten years of literature relating technology and knowledge transfer with issues that permeate urban planning. In order to compose the bibliographic portfolio of articles, the methodology Methodi Ordinatio was employed in order to qualify and rank the papers according to their scientific relevance. Papers from the last ten years are used as the study framework. Results indicate that the subject, applied to the context of cities, it is little explored and existing studies are predominantly theoretical. This article also contributes by bringing important information on the topics, serving as a guide for future publications.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Giovanni Luigi Ferreira Schiavon, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná / Curitiba, Paraná - Brasil

Engenheiro Civil - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa ( UEPG). Mestre em Engenharia de Produção - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR). Stage académique intensif - Université de Technologie de Compiègne (UTC). Pós-Graduando em Planejamento, Gestão e Controle de Obras Civis - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ).

Angelica Duarte Lima, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná

Doutoranda em Engenharia de Produção (UTFPR). Possuo graduação em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2017) e mestrado em Engenharia na área de Ciência e Tecnologia de Materiais na linha de Energia Solar Fotovoltaica.

Lou Grimmal, Universidade de Tecnologia de Troyes / Troyes, França

Doutoranda em Engenharia (Universidade de tecnologia de Troyes). Possui Mestrado em gestão do desenvolvimento sustentável.

Serge Rohmer, Universidade de Tecnologia de Troyes / Troyes, França

Professor pesquisador da Universidade de tecnologia de Troyes. Doutor em produção automatizada (Universidade Henri Poincaré)

Regina Negri Pagani, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná / Curitiba, Paraná - Brasil

Professora Adjunta do Magistério Superior na Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) no Departamento Acadêmico de Engenharia de Produção (DAENP). Docente permanente no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção (Mestrado e Doutorado). É doutora em Engenharia de Produção (UTFPR) com período sanduíche na Université de Technologie de Compiègne - Sorbonne Universités.

Referências

Boix, R., & Trullén, J. (2007). Knowledge, networks of cities and growth in regional urban systems. Papers in Regional Science, 86(4), 551-574, doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00139.x.

Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp.627–655, doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1.

Bulu, M. (2014). Upgrading a city via technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 63-67. doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.009

Bulu, M. Y., & Olcay, G. A. (2014). Assessing the role of technology transfer offices for being an innovative city: the case of Instanbul. The 7th Knowledge Cities World Summit, 249.

Chen, H., & Xie, F. (2018). How technological proximity affect collaborative innovation? An empirical study of China’s Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. Journal of Management Analytics, 5(4), 287-308.

Dicken, P. (2004). Geographers and ‘globalization’:(yet) another missed boat?. Transactions of the institute of British Geographers, 29(1), 5-26, doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00111.x

Duan, D., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., & Du, D. (2019). Regional integration in the inter-city technology transfer system of the Yangtze River Delta, China. Sustainability, 11(10), 2941, doi.org/10.3390/su11102941

Edler, J., Fier, H., & Grimpe, C. (2011). International scientist mobility and the locus of knowledge and technology transfer. Research policy, 40(6), 791-805, doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.003

Franco, L.S., Franco, A.C., Doliveira, S.L.D., Maganhotto, R.F., & Magni, C. (2022). Desenvolvimento sustentável de smart cities baseada no contexto do Triple Bottom Line: uma revisão sistemática de literatura. Exacta.20(3), 627-646.

Hidalgo, J., Lemonsu, A., & Masson, V. (2019). Between progress and obstacles in urban climate interdisciplinary studies and knowledge transfer to society. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1436(1), 5-18, doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13986.

Hope, A. (2016). Creating sustainable cities through knowledge exchange: A case study of knowledge transfer partnerships. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-04-2015-0079.

Karlštrēma, I. (2017). Knowledge Transfer and Advanced Urban Planning in the Newly Established Ring of Boulevards in Riga: The Case of the First Municipal Gas Factory. Journal of Urban History, 43(4), 639-650, doi.org/10.1177/0096144217705642.

Lee, S. M. & Trimi, S. (2018). Innovation for creating a smart future. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1-8, doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.11.001

Li, L. (2017). China’s manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “Made‐in‐China 2025” and “Industry 4.0”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2025, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.028.

Marques, J. L., Cavalcanti, A. M., & Silva, A. M, da. A. (2021, jan./mar.). A evolução dos núcleos de inovação tecnológica no Brasil no período de 2006 a 2016. Exacta, 19(1), 210- 224. https://doi.org/10.5585/exactaep.v19n1.11153.

Miszczak, S. M., & Patel, Z. (2018). The role of engaged scholarship and co-production to address urban challenges: a case study of the Cape Town Knowledge Transfer Programme. South African Geographical Journal Suid-Afrikaanse Geografiese Tydskrif, 100(2), 233-248, doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2017.1409649.

Moodley, S. (2019). Defining city-to-city learning in southern Africa: Exploring practitioner sensitivities in the knowledge transfer process. Habitat International, 85, 34-40, doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.02.004.

Pagani, R. N., Kovaleski, J. L., & Resende, L. M. (2015). Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2109-2135,

doi.org/ 10.1007/s11192-015-1744-x.

Pagani, R. N., Zammar, G., Kovaleski, J. L., & Resende, L. M. (2016) Technology transfer models: typology and a generic model. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 14(1), 20-41.

Pagani, R., Kovaleski, J., & Resende, L. (2018). TICs na composição da Methodi Ordinatio: construção de portfólio bibliográfico sobre Modelos de Transferência de Tecnologia, Ciência da Informação, Vol.47, No.1. DOI: 10.18225/ci.inf..v47i1.1886.

Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., & Guaralda, M. (2014). Urban knowledge and innovation spaces: concepts, conditions and contexts. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 15-38.

Perrotti, D. (2019). Evaluating urban metabolism assessment methods and knowledge transfer between scientists and practitioners: A combined framework for supporting practice-relevant research. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(8), 1458-1479, doi.org/10.1177/2399808319832611.

Santamaria Varas, M., & Martinez-Diez, P. (2016). How urban fabric fosters knowledge transfer and innovation: the example of Barcelona. In ISOCARP 2015: 51st International Society of City and Regional Planners Congress: Cities Save the World:

Rotterdam, Netherlands: October, 19-23, 2105: proceedings book.

Stevens, A., Toneguzzo, F., & Bostrom, D. (2005). AUTM US licensing survey: FY 2004 [Survey summary]. Association of University Technology Managers.

Valencia-Vázquez, R., Pérez-López, M. E., Vicencio-De-La-Rosa, M. G., Martínez-Prado, M. A., & Rubio-Hernández, R. (2014). Knowledge and technology transfer to improve the municipal solid waste management system of Durango City, Mexico. Waste management & research, 32(9), 848-856, doi.org/10.1177/0734242X14546035.

Yigitcanlar, T., & Lee, S. H. (2014). Korean ubiquitous-eco-city: A smart-sustainable urban form or a branding hoax?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 100-114. doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.034.