QFD sustentável: uma revisão bibliométrica e sistemática da literatura

Henrique Monte Mor Silva; Rosangela Maria Vanalle

doi:10.5585/exactaep.2021.17436

Authors

Henrique Monte Mor Silva Universidade Nove de Julho – UNINOVE https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4890-2604
Rosangela Maria Vanalle Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8265-0231

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/exactaep.2021.17436

Keywords:

Quality function deployment, QFD, Sustainability, Sustainable QFD.

Abstract

This research aimed to carry out a bibliometric and systematic literature review to investigate what has been done in relation to the QFD, regarding the sustainability aspects, in order to identify gaps in the literature and propose suggestions for future research. The main raised bibliometric aspects revealed that the most relevant authors on the subject, regarding the amount of publications and relationships with other authors, are Vinodh and Yazdani. The most used research method was the case study and the country that has published the most on the subject is India. The systematic review revealed that more than 50% of published articles already consider the three aspects of sustainability (economic, environmental and social) and just over 40% do not consider the social aspect, but there is a tendency in studies to incorporate the social aspect. It also revealed that most of the studies that propose the QFD considering sustainable aspects use it in its conventional format, but the number of studies that integrate other tools to the QFD is expressive, mentioning a better result. Of these, the most frequently used tools are the LCA, the ANP and the AHP. However, it was evident the lack of consensus regarding the best method of so many proposals, depending on the focus and the application segment. As for the method, there is a lack of research on the topic that uses methods different from the case study. In addition, there are segments and focuses in which the QFD is still little explored.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Henrique Monte Mor Silva, Universidade Nove de Julho – UNINOVE

Doutor em Engenharia de Produção
Universidade Nove de Julho – UNINOVE

Rosangela Maria Vanalle, Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE

Pós-Doutora em Gerência da Produção
Universidad Complutense de Madri – UCM
Professora no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção da Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE

References

Afshari, H., Peng, Q., & Gu, P. (2016). Reducing effects of design uncertainties on product sustainability. Cogent Engineering, 115, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2016.1231388

Akmal, A., N. Podgorodnichenko, R. Greatbanks, & A. M. Everett. (2018). Bibliometric Analysis of Production Planning and Control (1990–2016). Production Planning & Control, 29 (4): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1429030

Andres, A. 2009. Measuring Academic Research: How to Undertake a Bibliometric Study. Oxford: Chandos.

Azadnia, A. H., & Ghadimi, P. (2018). An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment and Fuzzy Multi-Objective Programming to Sustainable Supplier Selection and Order Allocation. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.22094/JOIE.2017.629.1405

Bardin, L. (1986). El anàlisis de contenido. [s.l.] Madrid. Ediciones Akal, Spain.

Bereketli, I., & Genevois, M. E. (2013). An integrated QFDE approach for identifying improvement strategies in sustainable product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 54, 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.053

Berketli, I., & Genevois, M. E. (2012). Environmental Impact Assessment in Sustainable Manufacturing : A Case Study. Proceedings of the 14th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing Bucharest, 746–751. https://doi.org/10.3182/20120523-3-RO-2023.00194

Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F. E., & Giacchetta, G. (2008). Design for environment as a tool for the development of a sustainable supply chain. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1(3), 188-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397030802506657

Bolar, A. A., Tesfamariam, S., & Sadiq, R. (2017). Framework for prioritizing infrastructure user expectations using Quality Function Deployment ( QFD ). International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 6(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.02.002

Brito, M. P.; & Van Der Laan, E. A. Supply chain management and sustainability: Procrastinating integration in mainstream research. International engineering management conference proceedings, v. 2, n. 4, p. 859–870, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2040859

Bryman, A. (1989). Rsearch methods and organization studies. London: Unwin Hyman.

Büyüközkan, G, & Berkol, C. (2011). Designing a sustainable supply chain using an integrated analytic network process and goal programming approach in quality function deployment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 13731–13748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.171

Büyüközkan, Gülc¸ in, & I, G. C. ifc¸. (2013). An integrated QFD framework with multiple formatted and incomplete preferences : A sustainable supply chain application. Applied Soft Computing, 13, 3931–3941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2013.03.014

Chan, L.K., & Wu, M.L. (2002). Quality function deployment: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(3), 463-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00178-9

Chen, Z., Martínez, L., Chang, J., Wang, X., & Xionge, S. (2019). Sustainable building material selection : A QFD- and ELECTRE III-embedded hybrid MCGDM approach with consensus building. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 85, 783–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.08.006

Chowdary, B. V. (2014). Fuzzy QFD integrated CAD / CAE and DFE framework : enabler of sustainable product design practices. International Journal Collaborative Enterprise, 4(4), 278–298. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCENT.2014.066997

Chowdhury, M. H., Hossain, M., & Dewan, M. N. (2015). A framework for selecting optimal strategies to mitigate the corporate sustainability barriers. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1), 462–481. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c4p5

Chowdhury, Md. M. H., & Mohammed, A. Q. (2016) A multi-phased QFD optimization approach to sustainable service design. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.09.023

Cooper, H. M., & Lindsay, J. J. (1998). Research synthesis and meta-analysis, In: Bickman, L.; Rog, D. J. Handbook of applied social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 315-342.

Costa, I. S., Oliveira Neto, G. C., & Leite, R. R. (2020). How does the use of PPC tools/activities improve eco-efficiency? A systematic literature review. Production Planning & Control, https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1743890

Dai, J., & Blackhurst, J. (2012). A four-phase AHP-QFD approach for supplier assessment: A sustainability perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 50(19), 5474–5490. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.639396

Dania, W. A. P., Xing, K., & Amer, Y. (2019). Collaboration quality assessment for sustainable supply chains: benchmarking. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(5), 1469–1498. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-03-2018-0070

Desai, A., & Thomassian, J.-C. (2009). Curriculum development on a " sustainability " major using quality function deployment ( QFD ) techniques. American Society for ngineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--5694

Devanathan, S., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W. Z., Zhao, F., & Ramani, K. (2010). Integration of Sustainability Into Early Design Through the Function Impact Matrix. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001890

Erthal, A., & L. Marques. (2018). National Culture and Organisational Culture in Lean Organisations: A Systematic Review. Production Planning & Control 29(8), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1455233.

Fargnoli, M., Costantino, F., Gravio, G. Di, & Tronci, M. (2018). Product service-systems implementation : A customized framework to enhance sustainability and customer satisfaction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.315

Feretti, I., Zanoni, S., Zavanella, L., & Diana, A. (2007). Greening the aluminum supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 108, 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.12.037

Francis, F., & Francis, F. (2012). The elaboration process – an approach for sustainable product development : a case study. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 5(3), 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2012.656730

Godin, B. (2006). On the Origins of Bibliometrics. Scientometrics 68 (1): 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0086-0

Gupta, A. K., & Modi, B. A. (2018). Selection of Sustainable Technology for VOC Abatement in an Industry : An Integrated AHP – QFD Approach. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 99(3), 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-018-0294-7

Halog, A. (2004). An approach to selection of sustainable product improvement alternatives with data uncertainty. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 4, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10970-006-0002-y

Halog, A., Schultmann, F., & Rentz, O. (2001). Using quality function deployment for technique selection for optimum environmental performance improvement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(5), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00080-9

Hassan, M. F., Keat, M. K., Yunos, M. Z., Adzila, S., Arifin, A. M. T., Rahman, M. N. A., & Haq, R. H. A. (2016). Investigation of existing laptop computer towards sustainable development using design for six sigma and design for disassembly. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(12), 7683–7688. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305373591

Hsu, C., Chang, A., & Luo, W. (2017). Identifying key performance factors for sustainability development of SMEs e integrating QFD and fuzzy MADM methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.063

Huo, L. (2012). Study on Multi-criteria Evaluation for Selecting Sustainable Protective Packaging System. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 200, 613–616. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.200.613

Huo, L., & Saito, K. (2010). Sustainability Assessment for Optimizing Logistics-oriented Protective Packaging Design. Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 19. http://www.spstj.jp/publication/thesis/vol19/Vol19No3-2.pdf

Ignatius, J., Rahman, A., Yazdani, M., Šaparauskasc, J., & Haron, S. H. (2016). An integrated fuzzy ANP–QFD approach for green building assessment. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22(4), 551–563. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2015.1120772

Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology – a step-by-step guide for beginners. 3.ed. Sage, London.

Kumar, A., & Bharat, G. (2018). Selection of Sustainable Technology for VOC Abatement in an Industry : An Integrated AHP – QFD Approach. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-018-0294-7

Lam, J. S. L., & Lai, K.-H. (2015). Developing environmental sustainability by ANP-QFD approach: The case of shipping operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.070

Lam, J. S. L., & Dai, J. (2015). Environmental sustainability of logistics service provider : an ANP-QFD approach. International Journal of Logistics Management, 26(2), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2013-0088

Lee, A. H. I., Kang, H.-Y., Hsu, C.-F., & Hung, H.-C. (2009). A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7917–7927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.052

Lin, C.-T., Chang, Y.-H., & Mi, C. (2017). Develop eco-friendly enterprise: Aligning enablers with strategy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040570

Lin, Y., Cheng, H., Tseng, M., & Tsai, J. C. C. (2010). Using QFD and ANP to analyze the environmental production requirements in linguistic preferences. Expert Systems With Applications, 37(3), 2186–2196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.07.065

Linton, J. D., Klassen, R., & Jayaraman, V. (2007). Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1075–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.012

Locatelli, G., & Mancini, M. (2013). Sustainability in the power plant choice. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 7(2), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2013.052579

Marconi, M. A., Lakatos, E. M. (2010). Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 7. ed. Atlas, São Paulo.

Marx, Â. M., Echeveste, M. E. S., & Paula, I. C. de. (2011). Desdobramento da função qualidade aplicado ao projeto de um detergente sustentável. Produção, 21(4), 724–741. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132011005000057

Mayyas, A. T., & Omar, M. A. (2012). Eco-material selection assisted with decision-making tools, guided by product’s attributes; Functionality and manufacturability. International Journal of Materials and Structural Integrity, 6(2–4), 190–219. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSI.2012.049955

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1006–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

Ojanen, V., Ahonen, T., Reunanen, M., & Hanski, J. (2012). Towards availability and sustainability in customer value assessment of asset management services. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(4), 368–391. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2012.050866

Oliveira Neto, G. C. de, Pinto, L. F. R., Amorim, M. P. C., Giannetti, B. F., & Almeida, C. M. V. B. de. (2018). A framework of actions for strong sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 1629–1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.067

Parra-López, C, Groot, J. C. J., Carmona-Torres, C., & Rossing, W. A. H. (2008). Integrating public demands into model-based design for multifunctional agriculture: An application to intensive Dutch dairy landscapes. Ecological Economics, 67(4), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.007

Paul, V. K., & Seth, V. (2017). Benchmarking and Objective Selection of Technologies for Housing in India Using Quality Function Deployment. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 22(1) 63–78. https://doi.org/10.21315/JCDC2017.22.SUPP1.4

Peruzzini, M., Marilungo, E., & Germani, M. (2015). Structured requirements elicitation for product-service system. Inernational Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 84(834), 189-218. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJASM.2015.073516

Popoff, A., & Millet, D. (2017). Sustainable Life Cycle Design Using Constraint Satisfaction Problems and Quality Function Deployment. In T. S. Umeda Y. Kondoh S. (Ed.), Procedia CIRP, 61, 75–80. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.147

Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25, 348–349. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026482.

Ramos-Rodrıguez, A.-R., & Ruız-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the Intellectual Structure of Strategic Management Research: A Bibliometric Study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.397.

Ramezankhani, M. J., Torabi, S. A., & Vahidi, F. (2018). Supply chain performance measurement and evaluation : A mixed sustainability and resilience approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 126(June), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.054

Rathod, G., Vinodh, S., & Madhyasta, U. R. (2011). Integration of ECQFD and LCA for enabling sustainable product design in an electric vehicle manufacturing organisation. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 4(3), 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2010.547624

Raut, R. D., Kamble, S. S., & Jha, M. K. (2016). An assessment of sustainable house using FST-QFD-AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach. International Journal of Procurement Management, 9(1), 86–122. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2016.073390

Rocha, A. C. R., Camargo, C. R., Kneipp, J. M., Avila, L. V., Gomes, C. M., & Madruga, L. R. R. G. (2012). Gestão Para a Sustentabilidade na Indústria Mineral: Um Levantamento da Producão Científica e Dos Hot Topics Publicados na Última Década. Revista Estudos Do CEPE 36 (2): 228–251. https://doi.org/10.17058/cepe.v0i0.3119

Romli, A., Prickett, P., Setchi, R., & Soe, S. (2015). Integrated eco-design decision-making for sustainable product development. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.958593

Salari, M., & Bhuiyan, N. (2018). A new model of sustainable product development process for making trade-offs. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(1–4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-016-9349-Y

Sayadi, S., Erraach, Y., & Parra-López, C. (2017). Translating consumer’s olive-oil quality-attribute requirements into optimal olive-growing practices: A quality function deployment (QFD) approach. British Food Journal, 119(1), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2016-0228

Scott, J. A., Ho, W., & Dey, P. K. (2013). Strategic sourcing in the UK bioenergy industry. Intern. Journal of Production Economics, 146(2), 478–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.01.027

Shahi, M., & Alipour, A. (2016). Integration Axiomatic Design with Quality Function Deployment and Sustainable design for the satisfaction of an airplane tail stakeholders. Procedia CIRP, 53, 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.06.102

Singhaputtangkul, N., & Low, S. P. (2015). Modeling a Decision Support Tool for Buildable and Sustainable Building Envelope Designs. Buildings, 5, 521–535. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings5020521

Siu, J., & Lam, L. (2015). Designing a sustainable maritime supply chain : A hybrid QFD – ANP approach. Transportation Research Part E, 78, 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.10.003

Siu, J., Lam, L., & Lai, K. (2015). Developing environmental sustainability by ANP-QFD approach : the case of shipping operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.070

Soota, T. (2017). Integrated approach for sustainable product development using QFD and ANP. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 25(1), 59–75. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJISE.2017.080688?journalCode=ijise

Sousa-Zomer, T. T., & Cauchick Miguel, P. A. (2017). A QFD-based approach to support sustainable product-service systems conceptual design. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 88(1–4), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8809-8

Tadić, S., Krstić, M., Roso, V., & Brnjac, N. (2019). Planning an intermodal terminal for the sustainable transport networks. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154102

Tavana, M., Yazdani, M., & Di Caprio, D. (2017). An application of an integrated ANP-QFD framework for sustainable supplier selection. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20(3), 254-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2016.1219702

Thomé, A. M. T., Scavarda, L. F. & Scavarda, A. J. (2016). Conducting Systematic Literature Review in Operations Management. Production Planning & Control, 27(5), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2015.1129464

Utne, I. B. (2009). Improving the environmental performance of the fishing fleet by use of Quality Function Deployment (QFD). Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(8), 724–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.11.005

Uztürk, D., & Büyüközkan, G. (2018). Stakeholder preference based 2-tuple integrated method for sustainable hospital design. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, 2, 441–446. http://www.iaeng.org/publication/WCE2018/WCE2018_pp441-446.pdf

Vahidi, F., Torabi, S. A., & Ramezankhani, M. J. (2018). Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1351–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.012

Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., & Zimmermann, E. (2002). Measuring Progress and Evolution in Science and Technology – I: The Multiple Uses of Bibliometric Indicators. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00083

Vimal, K. E. K., Vinodh, S., & Jayakrishna, K. (2019). Application of fuzzy QFD for improving the process sustainability characteristics: A case study. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 32(2), 173–201. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2019.097528

Vinodh, S., Manjunatheshwara, K. J., Sundaram, S. K., & Kirthivasan, V. (2017). Application of fuzzy quality function deployment for sustainable design of consumer electronics products : a case study. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19(4), 1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1296-7

Vinodh, S., Mulanjur, G., & Thiagarajan, A. (2013). Sustainable concept selection using modified fuzzy TOPSIS : a case study. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 6(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2012.682100

Vinodh, S., & Srikrishna, J. (2012). Application of fuzzy logic-based Eco-QFD for a disconnecting switch. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 5(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2011.569582

Vinodh, S, & Chintha, S. K. (2011). Application of fuzzy QFD for enabling sustainability, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 4(4), 313-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2010.536853

Vinodh, S, Kamala, V., & Jayakrishna, K. (2014). Integration of ECQFD, TRIZ, and AHP for innovative and sustainable product development. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(11–12), 2758–2770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.10.057

Vinodh, S, & Rathod, G. (2010). Integration of ECQFD and LCA for sustainable product design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(8), 833–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.024

Vinodh, S, & Rathod, G. (2011). Application of ECQFD for enabling environmentally conscious design and sustainable development in an electric vehicle. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 13(2), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-010-0317-1

Vinodh, S., & Jayakrishna, K. (2014). Development of integrated ECQFD, LCA and sustainable analysis model: A case study in an automotive component manufacturing organization. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 12(1), 102–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-07-2011-0052

Wolniak, E. R., & S¸edek, A. (2008). Using QFD method for the ecological designing of products and services. Quality and Quantity, 695–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9160-9

Wood, L. C., Wang, C., Abdul-rahman, H., Syakirin, N., & Abdul-nasir, J. (2016). Green hospital design : integrating quality function deployment and end-user demands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 903–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.101

Wu, Z., Zhai, S., Hong, J., Zhang, Y., & Shi, K. (2018). Building sustainable supply chains for organizations based on QFD: A case study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122834

Yang, C., Huang, R., & Ke, W. (2012). Applying QFD to build green manufacturing system. Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations, 23(2-3), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2011.591632

Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., & Kazimieras, E. (2017). Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3728–3740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.095

Younesi, M., & Roghanian, E. (2015). A framework for sustainable product design : a hybrid fuzzy approach based on Quality Function Deployment for Environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.028

Zhang, L., Zhan, Y., Liu, Z. F., Zhang, H. C., & Li, B. B. (2011). Development and analysis of design for environment oriented design parameters. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 1723-1733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.012

Zhang, Z., & Awasthi, A. (2014). Modelling customer and technical requirements for sustainable supply chain planning. International Journal of Production Research, 52(17), 5131–5154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.899717