As Dificuldades na Adoção e Uso de Método Scrum em Empresas Brasileiras Utilizando Processos Plan-Driven: Estudo de Caso Múltiplo

Daniel Medeiros de Assis; Cláudio Luis Carvalho Larieira; Ivanir Costa

doi:10.5585/gep.v8i3.544

Autores

Daniel Medeiros de Assis IPT
Cláudio Luis Carvalho Larieira Fundação Getúlio Vargas
Ivanir Costa Uninove - Universidade Nove de Julho

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v8i3.544

Palavras-chave:

Métodos Ágeis, Scrum em Organizações, Processo Plan-Driven, Tailoring de Scrum.

Resumo

As empresas têm demonstrado interesse crescente na adoção de métodos ágeis em seus processos de desenvolvimento de software, visando obter os benefícios relacionados com aumento de produtividade, melhoria na qualidade de software e uma melhor forma de lidar com mudanças de requisitos, dentre outros. Contudo, já possuem processos consolidados, que entram em conflito com valores e práticas definidos pelos métodos ágeis, dificultando sua adoção. Este artigo apresenta os principais pontos de dificuldade na adoção do método ágil Scrum em empresas que usam processos plan-driven. Foi realizado um estudo de caso múltiplo, aplicado em três empresas brasileiras com estrutura organizacional e processos similares e que usam TI para suporte à seus negócios. Após a análise dos resultados, foram identificados os maiores pontos de dificuldade na adoção do Scrum em cada uma das empresas, que foram consolidados de forma a oferecer insumos para que as empresas fossem capazes de identificar pontos de ajuste necessários em seus processos para uma melhor adoção do Scrum.

Biografia do Autor

Daniel Medeiros de Assis, IPT

Mestre em Engenharia de Software pelo IPT

Referências

Abrahamsson, P.; Conboy, K., & Yang, X. (2009). ‘Lot’s done, more to do’: the Current State of Agile System Development Research. European Journal of Information Systems, 18(4), 281-284.

Bardin, L. (2004). Análise de Conteúdo. Edições 70, 229p.

Boehm, B. W. (1988). A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement. Computer Magazine, 21(5), 61-72.

Boehm, B. W., & Turner, R. (2003). Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed. Addison-Wesley/Pearson Education, 304p.

Cohn, M., & Ford, D. (2003). Introducing an Agile Process to an Organization. IEEE Computer Society, 36(6), 74-78.

Dingsoyr, T.; Nerur, S.; Balijepally, V.; Moe, N. B. (2012). A decade of Agile Methodologies: Towards explaining Agile Software Development. The Journal of Systems and Software, 85(6), 1213-1221.

Dinsmore, P., & Cabanis-Brewin, J. (2006). The AMA Handbook of Project Management. AMACOM, 512p.

Fowler, M., & Highsmith, J. (2001). The Agile Manifesto. Software Development Magazine, 9, 28-35.

Gren, L.; Torkar, R.; Feldt, R. (2014). Work Motivational Challenges Regarding the Interface Between Agile Teams and a Non-Agile Surrounding Organization: A case study. In: IEEE Computer Society, AGILE'14, pp.11-15. AGILE CONFERENCE, 2014 Proceedings... Florida, United States.

Highsmith, J. (2002). What is Agile Software Development? Crosstalk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 15(10), 4-9.

Hirsch, M. (2005). Moving from a Plan Driven Culture to Agile Development. In: ICSE '05 Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, p.38. ICSE '05 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Proceedings... St. Louis, United States.

Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1094p.

Lee, G., & Xia, W. (2010). Toward Agile: An Integrated Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Field Data on Software Development Agility. MIS Quaterly, 34(1), 87-114.

Nerur, S.; Mahapatra, R.; Mangalaraj, G. (2005). Challenges of Migrating to Agile Methodologies. Communications of the ACM, 48(5), 73-78.

Nikitina, N., & Kajko-Mattson, M. (2014). Guiding the Adoption of Software Development Methods. In: ACM Publications, ICCSP, 109-118. Proceedings of the ICSSP INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE AND SYSTEM PROCESS, Nanjing, China, 14.

Petersen, K., & Wohlin, C. (2010). The effect of moving from a plan-driven to an incremental software development approach with agile practices. Empirical Software Engineering, 15(6), 654-693.

Project Management Institute (PMI) (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) – Fifth Edition. Pennsylvania: PMI, 589p.

Royce, W. W. (1970). Managing the Development of Large Software Systems. In: IEEE WESCON 26, 1-9. Technical Papers of Western Electronic Show and Convention (WesCon), 1970 Proceedings... Los Angeles, United States.

Schwaber, K. (1995). SCRUM Development Process. In: Business Object Design and Implementation: OOPSLA '95 Workshop Proceedings, 167p. OOPSLA '95 Workshop on Business Object Design and Implementation, 1995 Proceedings... Austin, Texas, United States.

Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2013). The Scrum Guide. 16p. Available online at:<http://www.scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v1/scrum-guide-us.pdf>. Accessed on: 05 Feb 2017.

Senepathi, M., & Srinivasan, A. (2014). An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Agile Usage. In: ACM Publications, EASE, article n.10. EASE '14 18th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2014 Proceedings... London, United Kingdon.

Sutherland, J. (2001). Agile Can Scale: Inventing and Reinventing SCRUM in Five Companies. Cutter IT Journal, 14(12), 5-11.

Takeuchi, H., & Nonaka, I. (1986). The New New Product Development Game. Harward Business Review, 137-146.

Tolfo, C.; Wazlavick, R. S.; Ferreira, M. G. C.; Forcellini, F. A. (2011). Agile Methods and Organization Culture: Reflections about Cultural Levels. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 123(6), 423-441.

VersionOne (2014). 9Th Annual State of Agile Survey. 17p. Available online at: <http://info.versionone.com/state-of-agile-development-survey-ninth.html>. Accessed on: 05 Feb 2017: Author.

Waardenburg, G., & Vliet, H. (2013). When agile meets the enterprise. Information and Software Technology, 55(12), pp.2154-2171.

Yin, R. (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Applied Social Research Methods). SAGE Publications, Inc., 312p.