Contributions to Knowledge-Based Development through commons theory, using data as a common good

Maria Angélica Jung Marques; Jamile Sabatini Marques; Blanca C. Garcia; Tatiana Tucunduva Philippi Cortese

doi:10.5585/geas.v10i1.18231

Autores

Maria Angélica Jung Marques Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9710-2518
Jamile Sabatini Marques Instituto de Estudos Avançados da USP Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3734-4459
Blanca C. Garcia El Colegio de la Frontera Norte - COLEF https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0611-6560
Tatiana Tucunduva Philippi Cortese Universidade Nove de Julho Instituto de Estudos Avançados da USP https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2915-5084

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/geas.v10i1.18231

Palavras-chave:

Desenvolvimento baseado em conhecimento, Teoria dos bens comuns, Bens comuns urbanos, Bens comuns de conhecimento, Cidades inteligentes.

Resumo

Objetivo: Desenvolvimento Baseado em Conhecimento (KBD) é um campo científico multidisciplinar baseado no processo endógeno de criação de valor de compartilhamento de conhecimento. A Teoria Comum de Ostrom, por sua vez, explica como uma comunidade consegue compartilhar um recurso comum limitado sujeito a conflitos sociais. Este artigo revisa a literatura disponível em ambos os campos e pretende responder à questão de pesquisa sobre se e como a Teoria dos Commons pode contribuir para melhor compreensão do campo de KBD.

Metodologia: Análise qualitativa buscando semelhanças sobre as teorias, bem como estudos empíricos que pudessem trazer diferentes lentes para auxiliar na análise e identificar as contribuições da Teoria dos Commons para o campo do KBD.

Originalidade: A recente análise de artigos publicados em periódicos de alto impacto revela a falta de conexão entre commons e KBD.

Contribuições para a gestão: O KBD reúne grupos de pessoas que compartilham recursos tangíveis e intangíveis. A Teoria dos Commons de Ostrom, por outro lado, explica como uma comunidade de pessoas consegue compartilhar um recurso comum limitado sujeito a conflitos sociais. Este artigo aproxima os dois campos de conhecimento, buscando contribuir para o desenvolvimento do campo do KBD.

Resultados: Para os autores, a pesquisa mostra que os dados abertos como novos bens comuns são importantes para melhorar o desenvolvimento econômico do conhecimento como matéria-prima para o desenvolvimento de softwares e aplicativos que contribuem para o desenvolvimento das cidades, gerando empreendedorismo e contribuindo para o ecossistema de inovação.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Maria Angélica Jung Marques, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC

Doutora. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento - EGC

Jamile Sabatini Marques, Instituto de Estudos Avançados da USP Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC

Pós-Doutora. Centro de Síntese USP Cidades Globais do Instituto de Estudos Avançados da USP, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento - EGC

Blanca C. Garcia, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte - COLEF

Doutora. Professora Associada El Colegio de la Frontera Norte - COLEF

Tatiana Tucunduva Philippi Cortese, Universidade Nove de Julho Instituto de Estudos Avançados da USP

Pós-Doutora. Programa de Pós-graduação em Cidades Inteligentes e Sustentáveis - PPGCIS da Uninove, Centro de Síntese USP Cidades Globais do Instituto de Estudos Avançados da USP

Referências

Allen, D. W. E. & Potts, J. (2016). How innovation commons contribute to discovering and developing new technologies. International Journal of the Commons, 10, 2–20.

Batra, S. (2007). Knowledge Enterprises, Knowledge Economies, Knowledge Divide and Knowledge Societies: A Conceptual Framework. giftjourn@ l, 3(1), 13-20.

Batra, S. (2012). Development perspectives of knowledge management, Review of Knowledge Management, 2(1), 17-23.

Beckwith, R., Sherry, J., Prendergast, D. (2019). Data Flow in the Smart City: Open Data Versus the Commons. In: M. de Lange & M. de Waal (Eds.), The Hackable City. Springer, Singapore. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2694-3_11>.

Carrillo, F. (2014). What ‘knowledge-based’ stands for? A position paper. Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 5(4), 402–421.

Carrillo, F. (2015). Knowledge-based development as a new economic culture. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 1 (2), 15.

Carrillo, F. J. (2002). Capital Systems: Implications for a global knowledge agenda. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6, 379-399.

Carrillo, F. J. (2004). Capital Cities: A taxonomy of capital accounts for knowledge cities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8, 28-46.

Carrillo, F. J., & Batra, S. (2012). Understanding and measurement: perspectives on the evolution of knowledge-based development. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 3(1), 1-16.

Carrillo, F. J., & Flores, R. E. (2012). Measuring: Knowledge-based development metrics, evolution and perspectives. In T. Yigitcanlar, K. Metaxiotis, & F. J. Carrillo (Eds.), Building prosperous knowledge cities: Policies, plans and metrics (pp. 309–326). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Carrillo, F., Metaxiotis, K., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2010). Urban, regional, national and global knowledge capital. (G. Editorial, Ed.) Journal of Knowledge Management, 14, 631-634.

Cohen, B., Almirall, E, and Chesbrough, H. (2016). The City as a Lab: Open Innovation Meets the Collaborative Economy. California Management Review, 59(1), 5–13.

Cruz, M. (2019). O comum urbano em debate: dos comuns na cidade à cidade como comum? Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos Reg., 21(3), 487–504.

Errichiello, L., & Marasco, A. (2014). Open service innovation in smart cities: A framework for exploring innovation networks in the development of new city services. Advanced Engineering Forum, 11, 115–124.

Ergazakis, K., Metaxiotis, K., & Psarras, J. (2006). Knowledge cities: The answer to the needs of knowledge-based development. VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 36, 67-84.

Fachinelli, A. C., Carrillo, F. J., & D’Arisbo, A. (2014). Capital system, creative economy and knowledge city transformation: Insights from Bento Gonçalves, Brazil. Expert Systems with Applications, 5614-5624.

Ferreira, S., & Neto, M. (2005). Knowledge Management and Social Learning: Exploring the Cognitive Dimension of Development. Knowlegde Management for Development, 1(3), 4-17. Retrieved from: http://www.km4dev.org/journal: http://www.km4dev.org/journal.

Foster, S. (2013). Collective Action and the Urban Commons. Notre Dame Law Review, 87, 57. Retrieved from: <http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol87/iss1/2>.

Frischmann, B., Madison, M., & Strandburg, K. (2014). Introduction & Chapter 1. In M. J. Brett M. Frischmann, Governing Knowledge Commons. Oxford University Press. 1- 43.

Gonzalez, M., Alvarado, J., & Martinez, S. (2005). A compilation of resources on knowledge cities and knowledge-based development. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8, 107-127.

Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Harvard University Press.

Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. The city reader, 6(1), 23-40.

Harvey, D. (2011). The Future of the Commons. Radical History Review, 109, 101-107. Retrieved February 19, 2018, from https://read.dukeupress.edu/radical-history-review/article/2011/109/101/75136/The-Future-of-the-Commons

Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. New York. Retrieved February 2018, from: <http://abahlali.org/files/Harvey_Rebel_cities.pdf>. Verso Books: London and New York, 2012, pp. xviii + 187.

Hess, C. (2008). Mapping the New Commons. 12th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons. Cheltenham, England.: Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract.

Hess, C. & Ostrom, E. (2007). A Framework for Analyzing the Knowledge Commons. In E. Ostrom, Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice (pp. 41-81), MIT Press.

Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258-268.

Jasanoff, S. (2004). Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society. In States of Knowledge: Science, Power and Political Culture. Routledge, 25–98.

Kaunekis, D. (2014). Researching Complex Governance Arrangements: Elinor Ostrom's Legacy for Research Methods and the Analysis of Institutional Design, Policy Matters,19, 69-78.

Knight, R. (1995). Knowledge-based development: policy and planning implications for cities. Urban Studies, 32, 225-260.

Lara, A., Da Costa, E., Furlani, T. Z., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2016). Smartness that matters: towards a comprehensive and human-centred characterisation of smart cities. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2, 8.

Laszlo, K. C., & Laszlo, A. (2007). Fostering a Sustainable Learning Society through Knowledge Based Development. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. Syst. Res., 24(5), 493-503.

Lefebvre, H. (2008). O direito à cidade. 5a. Edição. Centauro Editora.

Lee, M., Almirall, E.& Wareham, J. (2016). Open Data and Civic Apps: First-Generation Failures, Second-Generation Improvements, Communications of the ACM, 59(1), 82-89.

Madison, M., Frischmann, B., & Strandburg, K. (2010). Constructing Commons in the Cultural Environment. Cornell Law Review, 95, 657-709.

Marques, M.A.J., Sabatini-Marques, J., Garcia, B.C., & Cortese, T.T.P. (2020). Contribution to Knowledge-based Development from the Commons Theory. In: T. Goydke & G. Koch (Eds.) Economy for the Common Good: A Common Standard for a Pluralist World? Tredition, Germany.

Moreira, S.; Fuster, M. (2020). Food Networks As Urban Commons: Case Study of a Portuguese “Prosumers” Group. Ecological Economics, 177, n. June 2019, 106777. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106777>.

Muñoz-Erickson, T.A, Miller, C.A, & Miller, T.R. (2017). How cities think: knowledge co-production for urban sustainability and resilience. Forests 8(6), 203.

Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times (pp. 282–291).

Niaros, V. (2016). Introducing a taxonomy of the “smart city”: Towards a commons-oriented approach? tripleC: Communication, capitalism & critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 14, 51–61.

Nightingale, A. (2011). Beyond design principles: Subjectivity, emotion, and the (Non)rational commons. Society and Natural Resources, 24, 119-132.

Ng, H. (2020). Recognising the edible urban commons: Cultivating latent capacities for transformative governance in Singapore. Urban Studies, 57, 1417–1433.

Norström, A. et al. (2020). Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability, 3(3), 182–190.

O'Reilly, T. (2011). Government as a Platform. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 6(1), 13-40.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. (I. University, Ed.) Cambridge University Press.

Ostrom, E., & Hess, C. (2007). A Framework for Analyzing the Knowledge Commons. In C. H. Ostrom (Ed.), Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. MIT Press.

Ostrom, E. (2009). Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. Prize lecture, pp. 408-444.

Phelps, Edmund (2013). Mass Flourishing: How Grassroots Innovation Created Jobs, Challenge, and Change. Princeton University Press.

Repette, P., Sabatini-Marques, J., Yigitcanlar, T., Sell, D., & Costa, E. (2021) The Evolution of City-as-a-Platform: Smart Urban Development Governance with Collective Knowledge-Based Platform Urbanism. Land, 10(33). https://doi.org/10.3390/ land10010033

Sabatini-Marques, J. (2020). Dados usados para o bem comum desenvolvem ecossistemas de inovação. Available in: https://itforum.com.br/coluna/dados-usados-para-o-bem-comum-desenvolvem-ecossistemas-de-inovacao/, Accessed on: 19th January 2021.

Sardeshpande, M., Rupprecht, C., & Russo, A. (2021). Edible urban commons for resilient neighbourhoods in light of the pandemic. Cities, 109, 103031. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103031

Schmelzkopf, K. (1995). Urban community gardens as contested space. Geographical review, Vol. 85, 364-381.

Schumpeter, J. (1911). The Theory of Economic Development. Oxford University.

Schuttenberg, H. Z. & Guth, H. K. (2015). Seeking our shared wisdom: A framework for understanding knowledge coproduction and coproductive capacities. Ecology and Society, 20(1): 15. Retrieved from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07038-200115>.

Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283>.

Yigitcanlar, T. (2010). Making space and place for the knowledge economy: knowledge‐based development of Australian cities. European Planning Studies, 18, 1769-1786.

Yigitcanlar, T. (2011). Knowledge-based urban development redefined: from theory to practice knowledge-based development of cities. In T. Yigitcanlar (Ed.), Summit Proceedings of the 4th Knowledge Cities World Summit (pp. 389-399). Bento Gonçalves, Brazil: The World Capital Institute and Ibero-American Community for Knowledge Systems.

Yigitcanlar, T., & Bulu, M. (2015). Dubaization of Istanbul: Insights from the knowledge-based urban development journey of an emerging local economy. Environment & Planning A, 47, 89-107. doi:10.1068/a130209p.

Yigitcanlar, T., O’Connor, K., & Westerman, C. (2008). The making of knowledge cities: Melbourne's knowledge-based urban development experience. Cities, 25, 63-72.

Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Buys. L., Ioppollo, G., Sabatini -Marques, J., & Costa, E., (2018). Understanding ‘smart cities’: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework. Cities, 81, 145–160.

Zhuang, T.; Qian, Q.K.; Visscher, H.J.; Elsinga, M.G.; & Wu, W. (2019). The role of stakeholders and their participation network in decision-making of urban renewal in China: The case of Chongqing. Cities 92, 47–58.