Model for characterizing the innovation process in design

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v9i1.15891

Keywords:

Innovation, Design, Process, Classification.

Abstract

Objective of the study: The value of design needs to be constantly reaffirmed due to its nature with eminently qualitative elements – unlike innovation, which has a quantitative origin. This article aims to explore the relationship between design and innovation and their common points.

Methodology/approach: The study has a qualitative character, with an exploratory and descriptive investigation, based on a surveying of the main terms and concepts about design an innovation, both printed and digital publications.

Originality/Relevance: From the main points of conceptual convergence, the text proposes an approximation between innovation and design based on a model consisting of the following criteria: application context; structure and organization of the company to generate innovation; dimensions that drive innovation; degree of novelty; and results generated.

Main results: With the proposed model for the characterization of the design innovation process, the research concluded that, although historically they appeared at different times, design and innovation are complementary disciplines with contiguous objectives.

Theoretical/methodological contributions: This work not only contributes to the discussion about a closer approximation between the two areas, indicating mutual benefits, but it also demonstrates that the proposed model can favor the understanding of the value of design.

Social/management contributions: The model described in this article can help innovation agents, companies and all stakeholders who aimed to restructure existing products or design new products based on innovation criteria.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alberthy Alysson Coelho Bernardo, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande

Graduado em Design de Produto pela Universidade Federal do Cariri (2016); Mestrando do Programa de Pós Graduação em Design pela Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (2019), na linha informação, comunicação e cultura, com foco na inovação dos artefatos.

Wellington Gomes de Medeiros, Universidade de Staffordshire

Possui PhD em Design pela Universidade de Staffordshire, Inglaterra (2007); Mestrado em Artes Visuais pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1998); e Graduação em Desenho Industrial pela Universidade Federal da Paraíba (1988). Atualmente é professor adjunto no Curso de Desenho Industrial da Universidade Federal de Campina Grande

References

Bürdek, B. E. (2006). História, teoria e prática do design de produtos. Blücher.

Cagan, J., & Vogel, C. M. (2002). Creating Breakthrough Products. Prentice Hall.

Cardoso, R. (2016). Design para um mundo complexo. 2. Ubu Editora.

Cautela, C., Deserti, A., Rizzo, F., &Zurlo, F. (2014). Design and Innovation: how many ways? Design Issues, 30, nº 1 Winter, 3-6.

Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press.

Chochinov, A. (2009). A good long tradition.Em Design Revolution: 100 products that are changing people's lives, por Emily Pilloton. Thames & Hudson, 6-9.

Cruickshank, L. (2010). The Innovation Dimension: Designing in a Broader Context.Design Issues, 26, nº 2 Spring, 17-26.

Fialkowski, V. P. &Kistmann, V. B. (2018). Gestão de Design e Inovação Incremental Guiada Pelo Significado.Estudos em Design, 26, nº 2, 28-53.

Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos – FINEP (2005). Manual de Oslo: diretrizes para coleta e interpretação de dados sobre inovação. 3ª. Tradução: Flávia Gouveia. DCOM/FINEP.

Forty, A. (2007). Objetos de desejo: design e sociedade desde 1750. CosacNaify.

Heskett, J. (2001). Industrial Design. 2ª. Thames & Hudson.

Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn. Boca Raton, FL.

Lambert, R. & Flood, R. (2017). Understanding design-intensive innovation: a literature review. Design Consul.

Margolin, V. (2014). A política do artificial: ensaios e estudos sobre design. Record.

Manzini, E. (2008). Design para a inovação social e sustentabilidade: comunidades criativas, organizações colaborativas e novas redes projetuais.Cadernos do Grupo Altos Estudos.

Manzini, E. &Vezzoli, C. (2016). O Desenvolvimento de Produtos Sustentáveis. Tradução: Astrid de Carvalho. 1. Ed. 4. Reimpr. Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.

Mortati, M. (2015). A Framework for Design Innovation: Present and Future Discussions. Design Issues, 31, nº 4 Autumn, 4-16.

Muratovski, G. (2016). Research for Designers: a guide to methods ands practice.1º. SAGE PublicationsLtd.

Norman, D. A. (2008). Design Emocional: porque adoramos ou detestamos os objetos do dia-a-dia. Rocco.

Norman, D. A. (2006). O design do dia-a-dia. Tradução: Ana Deiró. Rocco.

Ostrower, F. (1990). Acasos e percepção artística.Campus.

Papanek, V. (2005). Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change.Chicago Review Press.

Petroski, H. (2007). Evolução das Coisas Úteis: clipes, garfos, latas, zíperes e outros objetos do nosso cotidiano. Tradução: Carlos Irineu W. da Costa. Jorge Zahar.

Pilloton, E. (2009). Design Revolution: 100 products that are chanching people's lives. Thames& Hudson.

Pinheiro, I. R. & Merino, E. A. D. (2015). Os 4 vetores da inovação: Um quadro de referência para a gestão estratégica do design.Estudos em Design, 23, nº 2, 75-101.

Pinheiro, I. R., Merino, E. A. D., & Gontijo, L. A. (2015). Sobre a definição de inovação em design: o uso da análise de redes para explorar conceitos complexos.Revista Brasileira de Design da Informação, 12, nº 3, 357-375.

Pozatti, M., Bernardes, M. M. S., &Linden, J. C. S.V. (2016). Avaliação de Soluções Geradas a Partir de Métodos de Design Voltados Para a Inovação. Design &Tecnologia, 6, nº 12, 31-43).

Rampino, L. (2011). The Innovation Pyramid: A Categorization of the Innovation Phenomenon in the Product-design Field. International Journal of Design, 5, nº 1, 3-16.

Riccini, R. (2001). Innovation as a Field of Historical Knowledge for Industrial Design. Design Issues, 17, nº 4, Autumn, 24-31.

Santos, A. B. A., Fazion, C. B., &Meroe, G. P. S. (2011). Inovação: um estudo sobre a evolução do do conceito de Schumpeter. Caderno de Administração da FEA PUC/SP, 5, nº 1.

Schumpeter, J. (1988). A teoria do desenvolvimento econômico. Nova Cultural.

Sturken, M.; Cartwright, L. (2004). Practices of looking. Oxford University Press.

Tidd, J. (2005). Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. 3ª. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Verganti, R. (2008). Design, meanings and radical innovation: A meta-model and a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, nº 5, 436-456.

Verganti, R. & Norman, D. A. (2014). Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research vs. Technology and Meaning Change. Design Issues, 30, nº 1, Winter , 78-96.

Walker, S. (2014). Terra dos resíduos: sustentabilidade e design com dignidade. In Design, Resíduo&Dignidade. Olhares, 15-27.

World Design Organization (2018). Definition of Industrial Design. 03 de junho de 2018. https://wdo.org/about/definition/.

Downloads

Published

26.04.2021

How to Cite

Bernardo, A. A. C., & Medeiros, W. G. de. (2021). Model for characterizing the innovation process in design. International Journal of Innovation, 9(1), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v9i1.15891

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): Jan./Apr.

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Innovation

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal.

The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s).

The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s).

The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html

Authors  are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.