Adoption of ISO 56002 and ISO 14006 standards for technology transfer of sustainable innovations: an exploratory study about the designer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/iptec.v10i2.22027Keywords:
ISO 56002, ISO 14006, Innovation management, Technology transfer, Ecodesign.Abstract
The work aims to contextualize the standardized management systems of ISO 56002 for innovation management and ISO 14006 in the scope of ecodesign for environmental management, propose a framework for sustainable innovations, and analyze the profile of the designer professional for technology transfer. A literature review was carried out using the Methodi Ordinatio, which allowed the theoretical foundation on the subject to be based. Based on the comprehensive analysis of research focused on sustainable development and innovation, the interaction between the themes was evidenced, and their relationship through environmental regulations, performance and competitiveness. The work highlighted the use of knowledge to incorporate different methodologies and management tools with a common approach, globally accepted by ISO standards, in order to increase the level of productivity, maintaining a level of competition among organizations. And finally, it brought the characteristics that ISO standards collaborate for a designer professional to be able to transfer sustainable innovations.
Downloads
References
Barboza, B. M. L., Kovaleski, J. L., De Genaro Chiroli, D. M.; Souza, F. (2019) Práticas de Inovação e Desenvolvimento Sustentável: uma revisão sistemática. Revista Debates Sobre Innovación, (3), 1-14.
Baumann, H., Boons, F., & Bragd, A. (2002). Mapping The Green Product Development Field. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, 409–425.
Brones, F., & de Carvalho, M. M. (2015). From 50 to 1: integrating literature toward a systemic ecodesign model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96(SI), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.036
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86 (6):84–92.
Cerezo-Narváez, A., García-Jurado, D., González-Cruz, M. C., Pastor-Fernández, A., Otero-Mateo, M., & Ballesteros-Pérez, P. (2019). Standardizing innovation management: An opportunity for SMEs in the aerospace industry. Processes, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7050282
Chan, H. K., Yee, R. W. Y., Dai, J., & Lim, M. K. (2016). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.12.006
Cherrafi, A., Elfezazi, S., Chiarini, A., Mokhlis, A., & Benhida, K. (2016). The integration of lean manufacturing, Six Sigma and sustainability: A literature review and future research directions for developing a specific model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 828–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.101
Corsi, A., Pagani, R. N., Kovaleski, J. L., & Luiz da Silva, V. (2020). Technology transfer for sustainable development: Social impacts depicted and some other answers to a few questions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118522
Corsi, A., Barboza, B. M. L., Pagani, R. N., De Genaro Chiroli, D. M., & Kovaleski, J. L. (2021). Technology transfer oriented to sustainable development: Barriers and opportunities. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 20(02), 2150015.
Dangelico, R. M. (2016). Green Product Innovation: Where we are and Where we are Going. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(8), 560–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1886
De Giorgi, C., Dal Palù, D., & Allione, C. (2015). Development and results of a cross border network project, aimed at the engineering of eco-compatible products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.078
Dziallas, M., & Blind, K. (2019). Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis. Technovation, 80–81, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005
Elkington, J., (1997). Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century. Capstone, Oxford, UK. ISBN: 1-900961-27-X
El-Kassar, A. N., & Singh, S. K. (2019). Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.016
Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C., & Ratten, V. (2018). Environmental-related patent technology transfer effectiveness. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 14(3), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/wjemsd-10-2017-0079
García‐Quevedo, J., Kesidou, E., & Martínez‐Ros, E. (2020). Driving sectoral sustainability via the diffusion of organizational eco‐innovations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1437-1447.
Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J.A. and Urbano, D. (2015), “Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: an exploratory study of the United Kingdom”, Research Policy, 44(3), 748-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.008
Hallstedt, S. I. (2017). Sustainability criteria and sustainability compliance index for decision support in product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.068
Hamdoun, M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., & Ben Othman, H. (2018). Knowledge transfer and organizational innovation: Impacts of quality and environmental management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 759–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.031
Harrington, H. J., Voehl, F. (2019). The Innovation Systems Cycle. Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429324727
Hernández, R. J., Cooper, R., Tether, B., & Murphy, E. (2018). Design, the Language of Innovation: A Review of the Design Studies Literature. She Ji, 4(3), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2018.06.001
ISO 14001. (2015). Environmental management systems — Requirements with guidance for use. Accessed: https://www.iso.org/standard/60857.html
ISO 56002. (2019). Innovation Management System. Accessed: https://www.iso.org/standard/68221.html.
ISO 14006 (2020). Environmental management systems -Guidelines for incorporating ecodesign. Acessed: https://www.iso.org/standard/72644.html
ISO (2020). Accessed: https://www.iso.org/about-us.html
Jiang, P., Fu, X., Van Fan, Y., Klemeš, J. J., Chen, P., Ma, S., & Zhang, W. (2020). Spatial-Temporal Potential Exposure Risk Analytics and Urban Sustainability Impacts related to COVID-19 Mitigation: A Perspective from Car Mobility Behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123673
Johnson, M. P. (2015). Sustainability Management and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Managers’ Awareness and Implementation of Innovative Tools. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(5), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1343
Khan, P. A., Johl, S. K., & Johl, S. K. (2021). Does adoption of ISO 56002‐2019 and green innovation reporting enhance the firm sustainable development goal performance? An emerging paradigm. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 2922-2936.
Loorbach, D., & Wijsman, K. (2013). Business transition management: exploring a new role for business in sustainability transitions. Journal of cleaner production, 45, 20-28.
Martínez-Costa, M., Jimenez-Jimenez, D., Castro-del-Rosario, Y. P. (2019). The performance implications of the UNE 166.000 standardised innovation management system. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2018-0028
Manders, B., de Vries, H. J., & Blind, K. (2016). ISO 9001 and product innovation: A literature review and research framework. Technovation, 48–49, 41–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.11.004
Martens, M. L., & Carvalho, M. M. (2017). Key factors of sustainability in project management context: A survey exploring the project managers’ perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1084–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.004
Mir, M, Casadesús, M., Petnji, L. H. (2016). The impact of standardized innovation management systems on innovation capability and business performance: An empirical study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 41, 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.06.002
Moura, E., Bruno Rocha e Cruz, T., & De Genaro Chiroli, D. M. (2020). A framework proposal to integrate humanitarian logistics practices, disaster management and disaster mutual assistance: A Brazilian case. Safety Science, 132(August), 104965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104965
Navajas, A., Uriarte, L., & Gandia, L. M. (2017). Application of Eco-Design and Life Cycle Assessment Standards for Environmental Impact Reduction of an Industrial Product. Sustainability, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101724
Nidumolu, R, Prahalad C., Rangaswami M. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review ,87: 56–64.
OECD/Eurostat (2018), Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
Pagani, R.N., Kovaleski, J.L., Resende, L.M., (2015). Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication, Scientometrics. 105(3), 2109-2135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1744-x
Porter, M. E. and van der Linde, C., 1995a. Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate, Harvard Business Review, 73 (5), 120–134.
Ramanathan, R., He, Q., Black, A., Ghobadian, A., & Gallear, D. (2017). Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.116
Roos, G. (2016). Design-Based Innovation for Manufacturing Firm Success in High-Cost Operating Environments. She Ji, 2(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2016.03.001
Santolaria, M., Oliver-Sol, J., Gasol, C. M., Morales-Pinzón, T., & Rieradevall, J. (2011). Eco-design in innovation driven companies: Perception, predictions and the main drivers of integration. the Spanish example. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(12), 1315–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.009
Schöggl, J. P., Baumgartner, R. J., & Hofer, D. (2017). Improving sustainability performance in early phases of product design: A checklist for sustainable product development tested in the automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1602–1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.195
Soare, I., Rusu, M., & Militaru, C. (2019). Model for self-assessment of an organization’s ability to achieve sustained success. INCAS Bulletin, 11(3), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2019.11.3.20
van Vuuren, D. P., Kok, M., Lucas, P. L., Prins, A. G., Alkemade, R., van den Berg, M., ... & Stehfest, E. (2015). Pathways to achieve a set of ambitious global sustainability objectives by 2050: explorations using the IMAGE integrated assessment model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 98, 303-323.
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Acessed: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Inovação, Projetos e Tecnologias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do texto na da revista;
O(s) autor(es) garantem que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, idéias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder a ajustes textuais e de adequação às normas da publicação.
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) em http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
