The Consensus of Strategic Consensus: A Study of the State of the Art about the Theme

Authors

  • Marcelo Curth Feevale e UniRitter
  • Renata Araujo Bernardon Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - Puc - RS
  • Guilherme Trez Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos - UNISINOS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/ijsm.v17i1.2465

Keywords:

Consensus, Strategy, Decision-Making.

Abstract

This paper aims to present the state of the art regarding the strategic consensus, emphasizing the approaches and the nature of the research methods used, the results obtained and the future agenda for this theme studies. Analyzing beyond the last four decades of publications, it was understood that relating the strategic consensus only with the performance and strategic levels can be seen as something limited, suggesting the need to bring to the researching field new aspects and backgrounds as innovation, the methods for generating new ideas, the occurrence beyond the Top Management Team level (TMT), among others. Moreover, concludes that the predominant approach the strategic consensus is a process and the methodology used is based on quantitative techniques. As a suggestion for future studies, this study indicates the investigation of situations in which the strategic consensus is not positive.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marcelo Curth, Feevale e UniRitter

Professor e pesquisador dos temas comportamento do consumidor e marketing de relacionamento.

Renata Araujo Bernardon, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - Puc - RS

Diretora do Centro de Educação Continuada da PUCRS - EDUCON, professora em nível de graduação e pós graduação de disciplinas relacionadas ao tema de Gestão de Empresas Familiares, além de atuar como conselheira independente em conselhos de administração.

Guilherme Trez, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos - UNISINOS

Professor dos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Administração e em Gestão e Negócios da Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS). Tem experiência de pesquisa e consultoria em empresas de diversos setores.

Downloads

Published

07.11.2018

How to Cite

Curth, M., Bernardon, R. A., & Trez, G. (2018). The Consensus of Strategic Consensus: A Study of the State of the Art about the Theme. Revista Ibero-Americana De Estratégia, 17(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.5585/ijsm.v17i1.2465

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2018): January/March

Section

Articles

License

The author (s) authorize the publication of the manuscript in the journal;

The author (s) guarantee that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not being evaluated in another journal (s);

The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s);

Editors reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt to the publication's rules.

Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License - 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.

Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase impact and citation of the published work (see “The Effect of Open Access” at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).

Authors can use ORCID for identification. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work appropriately assigned.