Integração entre teoria dos stakeholders e visão baseada em recursos: trajetória percorrida pela literatura de administração

Fernanda Rodrigues de Siqueira; Carlos André da Silva Müller

doi:10.5585/riae.v21i1.20110

Authors

Fernanda Rodrigues de Siqueira Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Rondônia - IFRO. Universidade Federal de Rondônia - UNIR http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6922-5553
Carlos André da Silva Müller Universidade Federal de Rondônia - UNIR http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3707-6693

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v21i1.20110

Keywords:

Systematic review, Resource Based View, Stakeholder Theory.

Abstract

Objective of the study: This paper analyzes how the literature has addressed the integration between Stakeholder Theory and the Resource Based View studies.

Methodology / approach: A integrative review was carried out in the Scopus and ISI Web of Science databases. The articles were evaluated for their methodological quality and synthesis effort through the two theories combination.

Originality / relevance: The paper showed that there is a stakeholders internalization level of the organizational resources literature, that comes from the most external to the most internal level.

Main results: The analysis showed that there are three groups that assign different roles to stakeholders: (a) advisors for the development of resources / capacity; (b) precursors for obtaining new resources / capabilities; and (c) as a strategic resource for the organization.

Theoretical / methodological contributions: Advances in new conceptions about the role of stakeholders in organizations, from exogenous vision - putting pressure on the organization - to endogenous ones, which consider their demands as a resource/capacity. Regardless of how they are viewed, their relationship in organizational processes has contributed substantially to the field of strategic management.

Social / management contributions: Provides new insights for managers interested in observing stakeholders as a source of competitive advantage, being able to subsidize their portfolios of relationship optimization with stakeholders, according to each groups identified.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Fernanda Rodrigues de Siqueira, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Rondônia - IFRO. Universidade Federal de Rondônia - UNIR

Departamento de Apoio ao Ensino do Instituto Federal de Rondônia (IFRO). Mestranda do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração da Universidade Federal de Rondônia (PPGA / UNIR).

Carlos André da Silva Müller, Universidade Federal de Rondônia - UNIR

Doutor em Economia Aplicada. Professor e Pesquisador do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração da Universidade Federal de Rondônia (PPGA / UNIR)

References

Andries, P., & Stephan, U. (2019). Environmental innovation and firm performance: how firm size and motives matter. Sustainability, 11(13), 3585. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133585

Argadoña, A. (1998). The stakeholder theory and the common good. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1093-1102. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006075517423

Asher, C. C., Mahoney, J. M., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). Towards a Property Rights Foundation for a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm. Journal of Management and Governance, 9(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-005-1570-2

Ashrafi, M., Magnan, G. M., Adams, M., & Walker, T. R. (2020). Understanding the conceptual evolutionary path and theoretical underpinnings of corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability. Sustainability, 12(3), 760. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030760

Awan, U., Kraslawski, A., & Huiskonen, J. (2017). Understanding the relationship between stakeholder pressure and sustainability performance in manufacturing firms in Pakistan. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 768-777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.178

Baah, C., Opoku-Agyeman, D., Acquah, I. S. K., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., Failbil, D., & Abdoulaye, F. A. M. (2021). Examining the correlations between stakeholder pressures, green production practices, firm reputation, environmental and financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing SMEs. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 100-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.015

Bamel, U., & Bamel, N. (2018). Organizational resources, KM process capability and strategic flexibility: a dynamic resource-capability perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(7), 1555-1572. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0460

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Barney, J. B. (2018). Why Resource-based Theory’s Model of Profit Appropriation Must Incorporate a Stakeholder Perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 39(13), 3305-3325. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2949

Benlemlih, M., Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2016). Environmental and Social Disclosures and Firm Risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 613-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3285-5

Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488-506. https://doi.org/10.5465/256972

Botelho, L. L. R., Cunha, C. C. de A., & Macedo, M. (2011). O método da revisão integrativa nos estudos organizacionais. Gestão e Sociedade, 5(11), 121-136. https://doi.org/10.21171/ges.v5i11.1220

Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

Costa, A. B., & Zoltowski, A. P. C. (2014). Como escrever um artigo de revisão sistemática. In Koller, S. H., Couto, M. C. P. de., & Hohendorff, J. Von. (Eds), Manual de produção científica (pp. 53-67). Porto Alegre: Penso.

Cui, Y., & Jiao, H. (2011). Dynamic capabilities, strategic stakeholder alliances and sustainable competitive advantage: evidence from China. Corporate Governance, 11(4), 386-398. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701111159235

De Bakker, F., & Nijhof, A. (2002). Responsible chain management: a capability assessment framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.319

Delgado-Ceballos, J., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Ortiz-De-Mandojana, N., & Rueda-Manzanares, A. (2012). The effect of internal barriers on the connection between stakeholder integration and proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 281-293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1039-y

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887

Ehrgott, M., Reimann, F., Kaufmann, L., & Carter, C. R. (2013). Environmental development of emerging economy suppliers: antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12015

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J.A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E

Feldman M. S., & Pentland B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620

Feng, L., Zhao, W., Li, H., & Song, Y. (2018). The effect of environmental orientation on green innovation: do political ties matter? Sustainability, 10(12), 4674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124674

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston, United States: Pitman.

Freeman, R. E., Dmytriyev, S. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2021). Stakeholder Theory and the Resource-Based View of the Firm. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321993576

Freeman, R. E., & McVea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.263511

Freeman, R. E, Phillips, R., & Sisodia, R. (2018). Tensions in Stakeholder Theory. Business & Society, 59(2), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318773750

Gallego‐Álvarez, I., Manuel Prado‐Lorenzo, J., & García‐Sánchez, I. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and innovation: a resource‐based theory. Management Decision, 49(10), 1709-1727. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111183843

Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110

Ghassim, B., & Bogers, M. (2019). Linking stakeholder engagement to profitability through sustainability-oriented innovation: a quantitative study of the minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 905-919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.226

Gianni, M., Gotzamani, K., & Tsiotras, G. (2017). Multiple perspectives on integrated management systems and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1297-1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.061

Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<203::AID-SMJ102>3.0.CO;2-K

Hami, N., Muhamad, M. R., & Ebrahim, Z. (2016). The impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on sustainability. Jurnal Teknologi, 78(1), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.3090

Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Srategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997-1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332

Hu Y., Chen S., Shao Y., & Gao S. (2018). CSR and firm value: evidence from China. Sustainability, 10(12), 4597. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124597

Huang, W., Chen, S., & Nguyen, L. T. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and organizational resilience to Covid-19 crisis: an empirical study of chinese firms. Sustainability, 12(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218970

Islam, T., Islam, R., Pitafi, A. H., Xiaobei, L., Rehmani, M., Irfan, M., & Mubarak, M. S. (2021). The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty: The mediating role of corporate reputation, customer satisfaction, and trust. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.019

Ismail, A. M., & Latiff, I. H. M. (2019). Board Diversity and Corporate Sustainability practices: evidence on environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(3), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v10n3p31

Jiao, J., Liu, C., & Xu, Y. (2020). Effects of stakeholder pressure, managerial perceptions, and resource availability on sustainable operations adoption. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3246-3260. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2569

Jones, T. M., Harrison, J. S., & Felps, W. (2018). How Applying Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Can Provide Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 43(3), 371-391. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0111

Jussila, I., Kotonen, U., & Tuominen, P. (2007). Customer‐owned firms and the concept of regional responsibility: qualitative evidence from finnish co‐operatives. Social Responsibility Journal, 3(3), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471110710835563

Kim, S., & Lee, S. (2012) Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental logistics practices. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 23(2), 238-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574091211265378

Klopper, R., Lubbe, S., & Rugbeer, H. (2007). The matrix method of literature review. Alternation, 14(1), 262-276. https://doi.org/10.10520/AJA10231757_377

Kull, A. J., Mena, J. A., & Korschun, D. (2016). A resource-based view of stakeholder marketing. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5553-5560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.063

Li, N., Puumalainen, K., & Toppinen, A. (2014). Managerial perceptions of corporate social and financial performance in the global forest industry. International Forestry Review, 16(3), 319-338. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554814812572476

Li, S., Jayaraman, V, Paulraj, A., & Shang, K. (2015). Proactive environmental strategies and performance: role of green supply chain processes and green product design in the Chinese high-tech industry. International Journal of Production Research, 54(7), 2136-2151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1111532

Lin, H., Zeng, S. X., Ma, H. Y., Qi, G. Y., & Tam, V. W. Y. (2014). Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.046

Loi, T. H. (2016). Stakeholder management: a case of its related capability and performance. Management Decision, 54(1), 148-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-06-2015-0244

Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Sarkis, J., Latan, H., Roubaud, D., Godinho Filho, M., & Queiroz, M. (2020). Fostering low-carbon production and logistics systems: framework and empirical evidence. International Journal of Production Research, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1834639

Lourenço, I. C., Branco, M. C., Curto, J. D., & Eugénio, T. (2012). How Does the Market Value Corporate Sustainability Performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 417-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1102-8

Macaulay, C. D., Richard, O. C., Peng, M. W., & Hasenhuttl, M. (2018). Alliance network centrality, board composition, and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 997-1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3566-7

Marcus, A. A., & Anderson, M. H. (2006). A General Dynamic Capability: Does it Propagate Business and Social Competencies in the Retail Food Industry? Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 19-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00581.x

Maritan, C. A., & Lee, G. K. (2017). Bringing a Resource and Capability Lens to Resource Allocation. Journal of Management, 43(8), 2609-2619, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317727585

Martínez, J. B., Fernández, M. L., & Fernández, P. M. R. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: evolution through institucional and stakeholder perspectives. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 25(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2015.11.002

McGahan, A. M. (2021). Integrating insights from the Resource-Based View of the firm into the New Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320987282

Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Ozanne, L. (2010). The Interactive Effect of Internal and External Factors on a Proactive Environmental Strategy and its Influence on a Firm’s Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 279-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0264-0

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247

Mylan, J. (2016). The business of “behaviour change”: analysing the consumer-oriented corporate sustainability journey of low-temperature laundry. Organization & Environment, 30(4), 283-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026616677169

Pablo, A. L., Reay, T., Dewald, J. R., & Casebeer, A. L. (2007). Identifying, enabling and managing dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Journal of Management Studies, 44(5), 687-708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00675.x

Padhi, S. S., Pati, R. K., & Rajeev, A. (2018). Framework for selecting sustainable supply chain processes and industries using an integrated approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 969-984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.306

Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: the state of the art. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403-445. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.495581

Penz, E., & Polsa, P. (2018). How do companies reduce their carbon footprint and how do they communicate these measures to stakeholders? Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1125-1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.263

Pieroni, M. P. P., McAloone, T. C., & Pigosso, D. C. A. (2019). Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: a review of approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 198-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research Methods for Business Students (7ª. ed.). Essex, England: Pearson.

Schmidt, C. G., Foerstl, K., & Schaltenbrand, B. (2017). The supply chain position paradox: green practices and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12113

Sodhi, M. S. (2015). Conceptualizing Social Responsibility in Operations Via Stakeholder Resource-Based View. Production and Operations Management, 24(9), 1375-1389. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12393

Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463-490. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.820

Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-553. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

Tetrault Sirsly, C.-A., & Lvina, E. (2019). From Doing Good to Looking Even Better. Business & Society, 58(6), 1234-1266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315627996

Thanh, T. T., Ha, L. T., Dung, H. P., Thang, D. N., & Ngoc, T. A. (2020). Determinants of marketing innovation among SMEs in Vietnam: a resource-based and stakeholder perspective. Innovative Marketing, 16(4), 74-90. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.16(4).2020.07

Ünal, E., Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D., & Manzini, R. (2019). Value Creation in Circular Business Models: The case of a US small medium enterprise in the building sector. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.034

Van Weele, A. J., & Van Raaij, E. M. (2014). The Future of Purchasing and Supply Management Research: about relevance and rigor. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12042

Wahba, H. (2008). Does the market value corporate environmental responsibility? An empirical examination. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.153

Wu, M. (2012). Managing stakeholders: an integrative perspective on the source of competitive advantage. Asian Social Science, 8(10), 160-172. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n10p160

Winter, S. G. (2000). The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 981-996. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266%28200010/11%2921%3A10/11%3C981%3A%3AAID-SMJ125%3E3.0.CO%3B2-4

Zhou, H., Wang, Q., & Zhao, X. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and innovation: a comparative study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(5), 863-882. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-09-2019-0493

Zollo, M., Bettinazzi, E. L. M., Neumann, K., & Snoeren, P. (2016). Toward a comprehensive model of organizational evolution: dynamic capabilities for innovation and adaptation of the enterprise model. Global Strategy Journal, 6(3), 225-244. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1122