Service level agreement directed to suppliers of materials and services of the petrochemical sector: a criteria analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v19i4.16847Keywords:
Service level agreement, Structural equation modelling, Supply Chain Management, Competitive criteria.Abstract
Objective: This research aims at suggesting a conceptual model for the formulation of service level agreement, directed at suppliers of materials and services of the petrochemical sector.
Methodology: This is a descriptive research whose analysis method was done through structural equation modelling, and the data came from a survey with 104 collaborators in the supply chain of the petrochemical sector in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Originality: Upon considering the reality of the Southern Petrochemical Centre, it is possible to understand this research’s findings to the elaboration of service levels according to competitive criteria that become fundamental for the management process and competitiveness strategy in the search for suppliers by selecting the criteria that must be analysed upon establishing a new partner.
Main results: All constructs suggested in this research had a 73% impact on the supply chain management construct with a service level agreement. The delivery, quality and service level construct presented the highest load obtained, followed by the quality and flexibility construct and finally the cost construct.
Theoretical contributions: The supply chains play an important role in the accomplishment of the company’s objectives. Its mission is to notice the competitive needs of products and services by becoming responsible for the delivery at the right time, costs, quality and other elements in the operations’ strategy. According to the suggested model, all structures that encompass the competitive criteria positively impacted the supply chain management and the service level agreement, expanding the academic debate in the development of competitive advantage.
Downloads
References
Abbasi, B., Hosseinifard, Z., Alamri, O., Thomas, D. & Minas, J.P. (2018). Finite time horizon fill rate analysis for multiple customer cases. Omega (United Kingdom) 76, 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2017.03.004.
Abiquim. (2018). Associação Brasileira de Indústria Química. O Desempenho da Indústria Química Brasileira em 2018. Avaiable at: www.abiquim.org.br. Accessed: dec 14, 2018.
Ballou, R.H. (2007). Business logistics/supply chain management: planning, organizing, and controlling the supply chain. Pearson Education India, 2007. Pearson Education, India.
BCIA, (2018). The performance of the Brazilian Chemical Industry. Brazilian Chemical Industry Association, Sao Paulo.
Bogataj, D., Bostjan, A. & Bogataj, M. (2016). Supply chain risk at simultaneous robust perturbations. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 181, 68–78.
Bowersox, D.J., Closs, D.J. & Cooper, M.B. (2002). Supply chain logistics management, McGraw-Hill.
Boyer, K.K. (1998). Longitudinal linkages between intended and realized operations strategies. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 18, 356–373. doi:10.1108/01443579810199739.
Boyer, K.K., Swink, M. & Rosenzweig, E.D. (2005). Describing the POMS Operations. Prod. Oper. Manag. 14, 442–449. doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00232.x.
Chen, C.-M.J. & Thomas, D.J. (2017). Inventory Allocation in the Presence of Service Level Agreements. Prod. Oper. Manag. 12, 3218–3221. doi:10.1111/poms.12814.
Chin, W.W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G.A. Marcoulides (ed.) Modern methods for business research. Mahwah, New Jersey Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. 295–336.
Chopra, S., Lovejoy, W. &Yano, C. (2004). Five Decades of Operations Management and the Prospects Ahead. Manage. Sci. 50, 8–14. doi:10.1287/mnsc.50.1.8.27056.
Chopra, S. & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation, Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Tsinghua University Press.
Eidelwein, F., Hoffmann, M., Piran, F., Neves, C. & Nunes, F. (2016). Systemic evaluation of maintenance management model in a brazilian petrochemical company. Espacios 37.
Eltantawy, R., Paulraj, A., Giunipero, L., Naslund, D. & Thute, A.A. (2015). Towards supply chain coordination and productivity in a three echelon supply chain: Action research study. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 35, 895–925.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50.
Forza, C. (2002). Survey research in operations management: a process-based perspective. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 22, 152–194. doi:10.1108/01443570210414310.
Gudergan, S.P., Ringle, C.M., Wende, S. & Will, A. (2008). Confirmatory tetrad analysis in PLS path modeling. J. Bus. Res. 61, 1238–1249. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.012.
Hair Jr., J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. & Tathan, R.L. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. New York - NY.
Hair Jr, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C. & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
Hair Jr, J.F., M., S., Hopkins, L. & Kuppelwieser, V.G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business researchitle. Eur. Bus. Rev. 26, 106–121.
Hassan, H.M. & Abdel-Aty, M.A. (2011). Analysis of drivers’ behavior under reduced visibility conditions using a Structural Equation Modeling approach. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 14, 614–625. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2011.07.002.
Junior, J.B.C, Vitorino Filho, V.A., Pires, S.L.I, Sacomano Neto, M. (2014). Coopetição como estratégia de auxílio na gestão de riscos em cadeias de suprimentos. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 13 (2), 39-52. doi: 10.5585/riae.v13i2.2030.
Krummenauer, R. & Nunes, F. (2017). Proposta de melhorias na manutenção autônoma do setor de utilidades de uma planta petroquímica. Produção em Foco 7, 338–359. doi:10.14521/p2237-5163.2017.0012.0008.
Lambert, D.M., Cooper, M.C.& Pagh, J.D. (1998). Supply chain management: implementation issues and research opportunities. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 9, 1–20. doi:10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0216.
Lau Antonio, K.W., Yam, R.C.M. & Tang, E. (2007). The impacts of product modularity on competitive capabilities and performance: An empirical study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 105, 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.02.002.
Ludwig, H., Keller, A., Dan, A., King, R.P. & Franck, R. (2002). Web Service Level Agreement (WSLA) Language Specification. IBM Corp. 1–110. doi:10.1109/WECWIS.2002.1021238.
Malhotra, N.K. (2008). Marketing research: An applied orientation. Pearson Education: India.
Menor, L.J., Roth, A. V. & Mason, C.H. (2001). Agility in Retail Banking: A Numerical Taxonomy of Strategic Service Groups. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 3, 273–292. doi:10.1287/msom.3.4.273.9969.
Muller, C., Fernandez, P., Diaz, O.M., Gutierrez, A.M., Resinas, M. & Cortes, A.R. (2017). Specifying Compensations with WS-Agreement. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 15, 1335–1341. doi:10.1109/TLA.2017.7959515.
Neto, J.P.B., Fensterseifer, J.E. & Formoso, C.T. (2003). Os Critérios Competitivos da Produção : um Estudo Exploratório na Construção de Edificações. RAC - Rev. Adm. Contemp. 7, 67–85. doi:10.1590/S1415-65552003000100004.
Owoloko, E.A., Iaeng, M. & Ezekiel, I.D. (2017). Determining the Optimal Policies for Product Supply Chain Management System II, 3–7.
Peng, D.X. & Lai, F. (2012). Using partial least squares in operations management research: A practical guideline and summary of past research. J. Oper. Manag. 30, 467–480. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2012.06.002.
Pereira-Moliner, J., Claver-Corts, E., Molina-Azorn, J.F. & Tar, J.J. (2012). Quality management, environmental management and firm performance: Direct and mediating effects in the hotel industry. J. Clean. Prod. 37, 82–92. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.010.
Pinto, J.R.C., Nunes, F.L. & Viero, C.F. (2015). Productivity gains and cost savings generated by the assessment process automation in a footwear company: A case study. Espacios 36.
Porter, M.E., (2008). On competition. Harvard Business Press.
Ringle, C.. da S. & Bido, D. D. (2014). Modelagem de equações estruturais com utilização do SmartPLS. Rev. Bras. Mark. 13, 56–73.
Ritson, N.H., Wilson, M.M.J. & Cohen, D.A. (2017). Managing engineering contractors in the UK petrochemicals industry. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 24, 1067–1080. doi:10.1108/ECAM-08-2015-0127
Rosenzweig, E. & Roth, A. (2004). Towards a theory of Competitive Progression: Evidence from High-Tech Manufacturing. Prod. Oper. 13, 354–368. doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2004.tb00223.x.
Sellitto, M.A., Nunes, F.L. & Vallladares, D.R.F. (2018). Factors That Contribute To the Use of Modularisation in the Automotive Industry: a Survey in Brazil. South African J. Ind. Eng. 29, 33–44. doi:10.7166/29-4-1946.
Sellitto, M.A., Pereira, G.M., Borchardt, M., Da Silva, R.I. & Viegas, C.V. (2015). A SCOR-based model for supply chain performance measurement: Application in the footwear industry. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53, 4917–4926. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1005251.
Sheehan, K.B. (2006). E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review. J. Comput. Commun. 6. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00117.x.
Singh, G., Tripathi, A., Srivastava, A. & Iyer, M. (2015). Integrated supply Chain outsourcing - Expanding the role of third party logistics in the upstream industry. Soc. Pet. Eng. - SPE Oil Gas India Conf. Exhib.
Slack, N., Chambers, S. & Johnston, R. (2010). Operations management. Pearson Education Limited.
Teece, D.J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plann. 43, 172–194. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
Teixeira, R., Lacerda, D.P., Antunes, J. & Veit, D. (2014). Estratégia de Produção: 20 artigos clássicos para aumentar a competitividade da empresa. Bookman, Porto Alegre.
Vitorino Filho, V.A., Moori, R.G. (2018). O efeito moderador das capabilidades da manufatura na relação entre gestão estratégica da cadeia de suprimentos e desempenho de negócios. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 17 (4), 71-89. doi: 10.5585/ ijsm.v17i4.2634.
Volk, E., Müller, M., Jacob, A., Racz, P. & Waldburger, M. (2009). Increasing capacity exploitation in food supply chains using grid concepts. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics 5745 LNCS, 88–101. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03864-8_7.
Voorhees, C.M., Brady, M.K., Calantone, R. & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 44, 119–134. doi:10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4.
Wang, J. & Wu, L. (2016). The impact of emotions on the intention of sustainable consumption choices : evidence from a big city in an emerging country. J. Clean. Prod. 126, 325–336. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.119.
Wang, Z., Zhang, M., Sun, H. & Zhu, G. (2016). Effects of standardization and innovation on mass customization: An empirical investigation. Technovation 48–49, 79–86. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2016.01.003.
Wheeldon, J. & Faubert, J. (2009). Framing experience: concept maps, mind maps and data collection in qualitative research. Int. J. Qual. Methods 68–83.
Williams, B., Onsman, A. & Brown, T. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A fivestep guide for novices. Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care (JEPHC), 8 (3), 2010.
Wong, K.K. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using SmartPLS. Mark. Bull. 32.
Zammori, F., Braglia, M. & Frosolini, M. (2009). A standard agreement for vendor managed inventory. Strateg. Outsourcing An Int. J. 2, 165–186. doi:10.1108/17538290910973376.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management (IJSM)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author (s) authorize the publication of the manuscript in the journal;
The author (s) guarantee that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not being evaluated in another journal (s);
The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s);
Editors reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt to the publication's rules.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License - 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase impact and citation of the published work (see “The Effect of Open Access” at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).
Authors can use ORCID for identification. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work appropriately assigned.
