Decision entity-ness: taking agency seriously in organizational decision-making studies

Eduardo Guedes Villar; Karina de Déa Roglio

doi:10.5585/riae.v21i1.18815

Authors

Eduardo Guedes Villar Regional University of Blumenau - FURB https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5005-4099
Karina de Déa Roglio Federal University of Paraná - UFPR http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5256-8330

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v21i1.18815

Keywords:

Decision, Action, Agency, Transaction, Relational sociology.

Abstract

Objective of the study: In this essay, we problematize the onto-epistemological assumptions of organizational decision-making theories, focusing on the concepts of action and decision.

Approach: Based on the epistemological perspective of transaction, we propose an understanding of decision as a relational element of action and in action, constructing an explanation supported on the relational ontological understanding of reality.

Originality/relevance: We introduce the concept of decision entity-ness, based on relational sociology from the perspective of transaction and the idea of relational agency.

Main results: The concept of decision entity-ness allowed us to theoretically combine the processual and performative dimensions of organizational decision-making.

Theoretical contribution: As a contribution, we developed an original theoretical-explanatory framework that emphasizes decision, understanding it as an element that distinguishes organizations from other social systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Eduardo Guedes Villar, Regional University of Blumenau - FURB

PhD.

Regional University of Blumenau - FURB

Karina de Déa Roglio, Federal University of Paraná - UFPR

PhD.

Federal University of Paraná - UFPR

References

Abbott, A. (1995) Things of Boundaries. Social Research, 62(4), 857–82. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40971127

Abend, G. (2018). Outline of a sociology of decisionism. The British Journal of Sociology, 69(2), 237-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12320

Ahrne, G., Brunsson, N., & Seidl, D. (2016). Resurrecting organization by going beyond organizations. European Management Journal, 34 (2), 93-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.003

Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of Decision – explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Harper Collins Publishers.

Allison, G. T., & Zelikow, P. (1999). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis (extended version). New York: Longman Publishing.

Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.59330882

Archer, M. S. (2000). Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Archer M. S. (2003). Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Balogun, J., Pye, A., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2008). Cognitively skilled organizational decision making: making sense of deciding. In Hodgkinson, G. P., & Starbuck, W. H. (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making. Oxford University Press, USA.

Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801-831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/345321

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin, UK.

Brunsson, N. (1982). The irrationality of action and action rationality: decisions, ideologies and organizational actions. Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 29-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1982.tb00058.x

Brunsson, N. (2007). The consequences of decision-making. New York: Oxford University Press.

Burkitt, I. (2016). Relational agency: Relational sociology, agency and interaction. European Journal of Social Theory, 19(3), 322-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431015591426

Burkitt, I. (2018). Relational Agency. In F. Dépelteau (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology (pp. 523-538). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cabantous, L., & Gond, J. P. (2011). Rational decision making as performative praxis: explaining rationality's éternel retour. Organization Science, 22(3), 573-586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0534

Cabantous, L., Gond, J. P., & Johnson-Cramer, M. (2010). Decision theory as practice: Crafting rationality in organizations. Organization Studies, 31(11), 1531-1566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610380804

Cabantous, L., & Sergi, V. (2018). Seeing the potentialities at the intersection: A reflection on performativity and processuality mindsets. M@n@gement, 21(4), 1229-1243. https://www.cairn.info/revue-management-2018-4-page-1229.htm

Calabretta, G., Gemser, G., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2016). The Interplay between Intuition and Rationality in Strategic Decision Making: A Paradox Perspective. Organization Studies, 38(3-4), 365-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616655483

Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(S1), 196-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x

Callon, M., & Law, J. (1995). Agency and the hybrid collectif. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 94 (2), 481-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822382720-006

Chia, R. (1994). The concept of decision: A deconstructive analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 31(6), 781-806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00639.x

Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2.

Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (1), p. 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2392088

Dawson, P. (2014). Reflections: on time, temporality and change in organizations. Journal of Change Management, 14(3), 285-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2014.886870

Denis, J. L., Dompierre, G., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. (2011). Escalating indecision: Between reification and strategic ambiguity. Organization Science, 22(1), 225-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0501

Dépelteau, F. (2013). What Is the Direction of the ‘Relational Turn’?. In: C. Powell & F. Dépelteau (Ed.). Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues, Palgrave Macmillan: New York, 163-185.

Dépelteau, F. (2015). Relational sociology, pragmatism, transactions and social fields. International Review of Sociology, 25(1), 45-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.997966

Dépelteau, F. (Ed.), (2018a) The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 686 pp.

Dépelteau, F. (2018b). Relational Thinking in Sociology: Relevance, Concurrence and Dissonance. In F. Dépelteau (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology (pp. 3–33). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dépelteau, F. (2018c). The Promises of the Relational Turn in Sociology. In F. Dépelteau (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology (pp. I - XXI). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dépelteau, F. (2018d). From the concept of ‘trans-action’ to a process-relational sociology. In Dépelteau, F. (Ed.). (2018). The Palgrave handbook of relational sociology London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 499-519).

Dewey, J., & A. Bentley (1949) Knowing and the Known. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Donati, P. (2011). Relational sociology: a new paradigm for the social sciences. London: Routledge.

Elias, N. (1978). What Is Sociology? New York: Columbia University Press.

Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/231209

Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency?. American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/231294

Ericson, M. (2010). Towards a sensed decision-making approach: From déjà vu to vu jàdé. Management Decision, 48(1), 132 – 155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011014490

Gavetti, G., Levinthal, D., & Ocasio, W. (2007). Perspective—Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie school’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organization Science, 18(3), 523-536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0277

Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hendry, J. (2000). Strategic decision making, discourse, and strategy as social practice. Journal of Management Studies, 37(7), 955-978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00212

Krarup, T. M., & Blok, A. (2011). Unfolding the social: quasi-actants, virtual theory, and the new empiricism of Bruno Latour. The Sociological Review, 59(1), 42-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01991.x

Langley, A., Mintzberg, H., Pitcher, P., Posada, E., & Saint-Macary, J. (1995). Opening Up Decision Making: the view from the black stool. Organization Science, 6(3), 260-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.3.260

Laroche, H. (1995). From decision to action in organizations: Decision-making as a social representation. Organization Science, 6(1), 62-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.1.62

Laroche, H. (2014). La décision comme production d'ordre dans les organisations. Connexions, 1, 11-18. https://www.cairn.info/journal-connexions-2014-1-page-11.htm

Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

Latour, B. (2012). “What’s the story?”: Organizing as a mode of existence. In Passoth, J., Peuker, B., & M. Schillmeier. (Eds.). Agency without Actors? New Approaches to Collective Action. London: Routledge, pp. 163-177.

Lorino, P. (2018). Pragmatism and organization studies. Oxford University Press. 347 pp.

Lorino, P. (2020). Trans-Action: A Processual and Relational Approach to Organizations. In Morgner, C. John Dewey and the Notion of Trans-action (pp. 83-109). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Maitlis, S., & Ozcelik, H. (2004). Toxic decision processes: A study of emotion and organizational decision making. Organization Science, 15(4), 375-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0070

March J. G. (1988). Decisions and organizations. Oxford: Brackwell.

March, J. G. (1994). Primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York: Free Press.

March, J. G. (1997). Understanding how decisions happen in organizations. In: Shapira, Z. (Ed.). Organizational decision making. Cambridge University Press, pp. 9-32.

Merkus, S., De Heer, J., & Veenswijk, M. (2014). Decision-making as performative struggle: Strategic political-executive practices influencing the actualization of an infrastructural development. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 3(2), 224-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-12-2012-0058

Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Theoret, A. (1976). The structure of ‘unstructured’ decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21 (2), 246-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2392045

Mintzberg, H. & Waters, J. (1990). Studying deciding: An exchange of views between Mintzberg and Waters, Pettigrew, and Butler. Organization Studies, 11(1), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069001100101

Morgner, C. (2020). Reinventing Social Relations and Processes: John Dewey and Trans-Actions. In Morgner, C. John Dewey and the Notion of Trans-action. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 1-30.

Nayak, A., & Chia, R. (2011). Thinking becoming and emergence: process philosophy and organization studies. In: Tsoukas, H.; & Chia, R (Ed.). Philosophy and Organization Theory (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, v. 32). London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 281 – 309.

Nutt, P. (2011). Making Decision-Making Research Matter: some issues and remedies. Management Research Review, 34 (1), 5-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171111096441

Passoth, J., Peuker, B., & Schillmeier, M. (Eds.). (2012). Introduction. In Passoth, J., Peuker, B., & M. Schillmeier. (Eds.). Agency without Actors? New Approaches to Collective Action. London: Routledge, pp. 1-11.

Pham, Q.N. (2013). Enduring bonds: politics and life outside freedom as autonomy. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 38(1), 29–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375412465676

Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. R., & McPhee, R. D. (1985). Group decision‐making as a structurational process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71(1), 74-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638509383719

Rammert, W. (2012). Distributed agency and advanced technology: or how to analyze constellations of collective inter-agency. In Passoth, J., Peuker, B., & M. Schillmeier. (Eds.). Agency without Actors? New Approaches to Collective Action. London: Routledge, pp. 89-112.

Rorty R. (1999). Philosophy and Social Hope. Penguin Books. 288 pp.

Rudolf, F. (2012). Questioning the human/non-human distinction. In Passoth, J., Peuker, B., & M. Schillmeier. (Eds.). Agency without Actors? New Approaches to Collective Action. London: Routledge, pp. 54-66.

Sayes, E. (2014). Actor–Network Theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency?. Social Studies of Science, 44(1), 134-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713511867

Simon, H. A. (1965). Administrative behavior . New York: Free Press.

Tsoukas, H. (2010) Strategic decision making and knowledge: a Heideggerian Approach. In: Nutt, P. C. & Wilson, D. C. Handbook of Decision Making. United Kingdom: Wiley, 2010.

Tsoukas, H. (2017). Don't simplify, complexify: from disjunctive to conjunctive theorizing in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 54 (2), 132-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12219

Vandenberghe, F. The Relation as Magical Operator: Overcoming the Divide Between Relational and Processual Sociology. In F. Dépelteau (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology (pp. 35-57). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Villar, E. G.; Rese, N.; Roglio, K. D. (2020). (Trans)Formative Trajectories of Decisions: An Analysis from The Translation Perspective. BASE - Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos, 17 (3), 361-391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4013/base.2020.173.01

Vo, L. C., & Kelemen, M. (2014). John Dewey (1859–1952). In Helin, J., Hernes, T., Hjorth, D., & Holt, R. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies. Oxford University Press.

Weick, K. E. (1969) The social psychology of organizing., Reading, MA: Addison‐Wesley.

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (v. 3). Sage.

Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obsfeldt, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking, Organization Science, 16 (4), 409-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133

White, H. C. (1992). Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.