Percepção da qualidade dos serviços de transporte de São Paulo:
uma análise de sentimento da satisfação dos cidadãos em relação aos terminais de ônibus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/2024.23392Palavras-chave:
Cidades Inteligentes e Sustentáveis, Teoria dos Stakeholders, Mobilidade Urbana, Análise de sentimentos, Qualidade do Transporte UrbanoResumo
Objetivo: Explorar a satisfação dos cidadãos sobre todos os terminais rodoviários (TRs) da cidade de São Paulo, Brasil.
Método: Este estudo realizou análise de sentimentos da percepção dos cidadãos de 32 TRs de São Paulo, composta por 8.371 comentários de usuários no Google Maps.
Originalidade/Relevância: Este estudo destaca o papel da análise de sentimentos como uma ferramenta ideal para a análise de stakeholders no contexto urbano.
Resultados: Primeiro, a análise de sentimentos é uma fonte valiosa para a gestão urbana orientada aos stakeholders. Segundo, a análise de sentimento fornece informações detalhadas sobre a satisfação do cidadão, fornecendo dicas valiosas para os gestores urbanos melhorarem a qualidade do serviço público. Terceiro, as Cidades Inteligentes e Sustentáveis podem fornecer quantidades múltiplas e massivas de dados que todos os tipos de stakeholders urbanos podem usar na tomada de decisão, o que fornece subsídios para realizar a análise de sentimentos. Quarto, a análise de sentimentos é útil para gestores de TRs melhorarem os serviços de TRs com base nos sentimentos do usuário. Finalmente, estudos futuros devem explorar o método classificação de sentimentos na análise de sentimentos dos aspectos críticos desdobrados neste estudo, bem como para explorar a responsividade dos serviços públicos municipais.
Contribuições metodológicas: Este estudo demonstrou que a análise de sentimentos pode ser um método para escrutinar as opiniões e percepções de stakeholders sobre os serviços governamentais municipais
Contribuições aos profissionais: Planejadores urbanos, formuladores de políticas de transporte e gestores urbanos podem usar a análise de sentimentos para promover uma gestão orientada aos stakeholders, que por sua vez promove a democracia e o desempenho urbano.
Downloads
Referências
Ahad, M. A., Paiva, S., Tripathi, G., & Feroz, N. (2020). Enabling technologies and sustainable smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61, 102301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102301
Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2016). Emerging economies, emerging challenges: Mobilising and capturing value from big data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, 167-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.022
Arvidsson, N., & Pazirandeh, A. (2017). An ex ante evaluation of mobile depots in cities: A sustainability perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(8), 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1294717.
Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002
Beck, D., & Conti, D. M. (2021). The Role of Urban Innovativeness, Smart Governance, and Smart Development in the Urban Smartness. Humanidades & Inovação, 8(49), 141-151.
Beck, D., & Storopoli, J. (2021). Cities through the lens of Stakeholder Theory: A literature review. Cities, 118, 103377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103377.
Beck, D., & Ferasso, M. (2023a). How can Stakeholder Capitalism contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals? A Cross-network Literature Analysis. Ecological Economics, 204, 107673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107673
Beck, D. F., & Ferasso, M. (2023b). Bridging 'Stakeholder Value Creation' and 'Urban Sustainability': The need for better integrating the Environmental Dimension. Sustainable Cities and Society, 104316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104316
Beck, D., Ferasso, M., Storopoli, J., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2023). Achieving the sustainable development goals through stakeholder value creation: Building up smart sustainable cities and communities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 399, 136501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136501
Beck, D. (2023). The EESSGG proposition for stakeholder-oriented urban management performance: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Environmental Management & Sustainability, 12(1), e23099. https://doi.org/10.5585/geas.v12i1.23099
Beck, D., Storopoli, J., Cunha, J. C., Vigoda-Gadot, E. (in press). Strategic Resource Management in Private, Public, and Mixed-Owned Organisations in Cities: The Power of Strategic Urban Networks. International Journal of Services, Economics and Management.
Beck, D., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (in press). Stakeholder-orientation in the Governance of Israeli Cities and Local Communities: A Qualitative Meta-Analysis. Israel Affairs.
Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2017). Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 183-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016
Borrego, Á., & Navarra, M. C. (2021). What users say about public libraries: an analysis of Google Maps reviews. Online Information Review, 45(1), 84-98. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-09-2019-0291
Bryson, J. M., Patton, M. Q., & Bowman, R. A. (2011). Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.07.001Get.
Caquard, S. (2014). Cartography II: Collective cartographies in the social media era. Progress in Human Geography, 38(1), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513514005
Carvalho, R. S., Levy, W., Bezerra, A. J. R., & Matos, C. A. (2021). Studies on Smart Cities and the Place of Democracy. Quaestio Iuris, 14(4), 1001-1038. https://doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2021.62782
Cavalheiro, E. R. M., Quaresma, C. C., & Conti, D. M. (2021). The use of smart traffic light in sustainable urban mobility: a systematic literature review. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional, 17(1), 274-289.
Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. (2018). Customer agility and responsiveness through big data analytics for public value creation: A case study of Houston 311 on-demand services. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 336-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.002
Clarke, A., & Margetts, H. (2014). Governments and citizens getting to know each other? Open, closed, and big data in public management reform. Policy & Internet, 6(4), 393-417. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI377
Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012). A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 512-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004
Corsi, A., Pagani, R., e Cruz, T. B. R., de Souza, F. F., & Kovaleski, J. L. (2022). Smart sustainable cities: characterization and impacts for sustainable development goals. Journal of Environmental Management & Sustainability, 11(1), 20750. https://doi.org/10.5585/geas.v11i1.20750
De Vries, E., Schoonvelde, M., & Schumacher, G. (2018). No longer lost in translation: Evidence that Google Translate works for comparative bag-of-words text applications. Political Analysis, 26(4), 417-430. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.26
Fellows, I. (2018). wordcloud: Word Clouds. R package version 2.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wordcloud
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freire, F. S., de Oliveira, L. G., Junior, A. N., da Silva, N. O., & Crispim, F. (2022). Cidade Inteligente: diagnóstico dos aspectos econômicos e da força produtiva do Distrito Federal. Journal of Environmental Management & Sustainability, 11(1), 20383. https://doi.org/10.5585/geas.v11i1.20383
Guo, Y., Chen, J., & Liu, Z. (2022). Government responsiveness and public acceptance of big-data technology in urban governance: Evidence from China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cities, 122, 103536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103536
Harrison, J. S., Freeman, R. E., & Abreu, M. C. S. D. (2015). Stakeholder Theory as an ethical approach to effective management: Applying the theory to multiple contexts. Review of Business Management, 17(55), 858–869. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v17i55.2647.
Hvitfeldt, E., & Silge, J. (2022). textdata: Download and Load Various Text Datasets. R package version 0.4.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=textdata
Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004, August). Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 168-177), Seattle, Washington, USA, Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1014052.1014073
Ibrahim, M., El-Zaart, A., & Adams, C. (2017). Stakeholders Engagement in Smart Sustainable Cities: A Proposed Model. International conference on computer and applications (ICCA). United Arab Emirates: Doha. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMAPP.2017.8079773.
Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., & Le Pira, M. (2018). Framing stakeholder involvement in sustainable port planning. Transactions on Maritime Science, 7(2), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.7225/toms.v07.n02.003.
Ji, J., & Gao, X. (2010). Analysis of people's satisfaction with public transportation in Beijing. Habitat International, 34(4), 464-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.12.003
Kaity, M., & Balakrishnan, V. (2020). Sentiment lexicons and non-English languages: a survey. Knowledge and Information Systems, 62, 4445-4480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-020-01497-6
Kedron, P., Li, W., Fotheringham, S., & Goodchild, M. (2021a). Reproducibility and replicability: opportunities and challenges for geospatial research. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 35(3), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2020.1802032
Kedron, P., Frazier, A. E., Trgovac, A. B., Nelson, T., & Fotheringham, A. S. (2021b). Reproducibility and replicability in geographical analysis. Geographical Analysis, 53(1), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12221
Khan, A. M., & Loan, F. A. (2022). Exploring the reviews of Google Maps to assess the user opinions about public libraries. Library Management, 43(8-9), 601-615. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-05-2022-0053
Khreis, H., Warsow, K. M., Verlinghieri, E., Guzman, A., Pellecuer, L., Ferreira, A., … Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2016). The health impacts of traffic-related exposures in urban areas: understanding real effects, underlying driving forces and co-producing future directions. Journal of Transport and Health, 3(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.07.002.
Lee, K., & Yu, C. (2018). Assessment of airport service quality: A complementary approach to measure perceived service quality based on Google reviews. Journal of Air Transport Management, 71, 28-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2018.05.004
Li, L., Mao, Y., Wang, Y., & Ma, Z. (2022). How has airport service quality changed in the context of COVID-19: A data-driven crowdsourcing approach based on sentiment analysis. Journal of Air Transport Management, 105, 102298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102298
Liu, B. (2020). Sentiment Analysis: Mining Opinions, Sentiments, and Emotions (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108639286
Maas, A., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011, June). Learning word vectors for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: Human language technologies (pp. 142–150), Portland, Oregon, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/P11-1015.pdf
Macke, J., Casagrande, R. M., Sarate, J. A. R., & Silva, K. A. (2018). Smart city and quality of life: Citizens’ perception in a Brazilian case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 717-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.078
Macke, J., Sarate, J. A. R., & Moschen, S. A. (2019). Smart sustainable cities evaluation and sense of community. Journal of Cleaner Production, 239, 118103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118103
Mathayomchan, B., & Taecharungroj, V. (2020). “How was your meal?” Examining customer experience using Google maps reviews. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 90, 102641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102641
Mendes, M. C. P., de Castro Fontes, M. S. G., & Magagnin, R. C. (2021). Experiências participativas no planejamento e gestão urbana: uma revisão sistemática. Journal of Environmental Management & Sustainability, 10(1), 19346. https://doi.org/10.5585/geas.v10i1.19346
Michelam, L. D., Cortese, T. T. P., Yigitcanlar, T., & Vils, L. (2020). O desenvolvimento urbano baseado no conhecimento como estratégia para promoção de cidades inteligentes e sustentáveis. Journal of Environmental Management & Sustainability, 9(1), 18740. https://doi.org/10.5585/geas.v9i1.18740
Miller, P., de Barros, A. G., Kattan, L., & Wirasinghe, S. C. (2016). Public transportation and sustainability: A review. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(3), 1076-1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0705-0
Mishra, S., Kushwaha, A., Aggrawal, D., & Gupta, A. (2019). Comparative emission study by real-time congestion monitoring for stable pollution policy on temporal and meso-spatial regions in Delhi. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 465-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.122
Mohan, D., Tiwari, G., Goel, R., & Lahkar, P. (2017). Evaluation of odd–even day traffic restriction experiments in Delhi, India. Transportation Research Record, 2627(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.3141/2627-02
Müller, K., & Wickham, H. (2021). tibble: Simple Data Frames. R package version 3.1.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tibble
Netto, N. A., & Ramos, H. R. (2017). Estudo da Mobilidade Urbana no contexto brasileiro. Journal of Environmental Management & Sustainability, 6(2), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.5585/geas.v6i2.847
Park, J. Y., Mistur, E., Kim, D., Mo, Y., & Hoefer, R. (2022). Toward human-centric urban infrastructure: Text mining for social media data to identify the public perception of COVID-19 policy in transportation hubs. Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103524
Phun, V. K., Kato, H., & Chalermpong, S. (2019). Paratransit as a connective mode for mass transit systems in Asian developing cities: Case of Bangkok in the era of ride-hailing services. Transport Policy, 75, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.01.002
Purwana, Y. M., Goro, G. L., Fitri, S. N., Setiawan, B., & Arbianto, R. (2022). Assessment of Seismic Loss in Surakarta School Buildings. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(5), 1772-1787. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.100506
R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna,
Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
São Paulo Transporte (SPTrans). (2022). Terminais | SPTrans. Retrieved from: https://www.sptrans.com.br/terminais
Silge J., & Robinson, D. (2016). tidytext: Text mining and analysis using tidy data principles in R. Journal of Open Source Software, 1(3), 37, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00037
Storopoli, J., Rufín, C., Quirino, G., & Ramos, H. (2019). Themes and methods in sustainability research. Journal of Environmental Management & Sustainability, 8(3), 410-430. https://doi.org/10.5585/GEAS.V8I3.15731
Tantalo, C., & Priem, R. L. (2014). Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 314–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2337
Tao, W. (2013). Interdisciplinary urban GIS for smart cities: advancements and opportunities. Geo-spatial Information Science, 16(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2013.774108
Thomas, P., & Palfrey, C. (1996). Evaluation: stakeholder‐focused criteria. Social Policy & Administration, 30(2), 125-142.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.1996.tb00432.x
Wickham, H. (2007). Reshaping data with the reshape package. Journal of Statistical Software, 21(12), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v021.i12
Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Wickham, H. (2019). stringr: Simple, Consistent Wrappers for Common String Operations. R package version 1.4.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stringr
Wickham, H, & Bryan, J. (2019). readxl: Read Excel Files. R package version 1.3.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readxl
Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L. & Müller, K. (2022). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 1.0.8. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Autores
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
