LUDUS - a process for management of academic works in information and communication technologies with a focus on innovation generation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/2024.24381Keywords:
development process, people management, university, market, innovationAbstract
Objective: This study proposes and evaluates an innovative process for managing and developing academic works in the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) field. The main objective is to boost innovation generation and stimulate entrepreneurship among students. In practical terms, the study aims to build a process that shapes research towards the creation of minimum viable products (MVPs).
Relevance: There is a misalignment between the University and the productive sector, mainly due to significant differences in expectations regarding the application of research and development results. These challenges hinder innovation generation and, consequently, the technological development and industrialization of the country, ranking it 64th out of 126 economies, according to the Global Innovation Index.
Methodology: This research combines quantitative and qualitative methods. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify the advantages and limitations of different comparison criteria. The created process, called LUDUS, was rigorously applied to Undergraduate Capstone Projects (UCPs) over a year in the Department of Computing at the Federal University of Sergipe (DCOMP/UFS). Three quantitative performance metrics were defined to evaluate the adoption of LUDUS: (i) project abandonment rate, (ii) MVP generation rate, and (iii) startup creation rate.
Main Results: LUDUS enabled the construction of proofs of concept (PoC) or MVPs with a 70.5% success rate, contrasting with the non-existence of successful cases in the pre-LUDUS period. In the academic sphere, LUDUS contributed to an increase in the UCP completion rate from approximately 69% to 86%.
Contributions: A new process for development and people management was conceived, tested, and validated to help mitigate the identified problem.
Downloads
References
Banerjee, R., Tarazi, J., & Akre, V. (2019). Mobile App for Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis-An Interdisciplinary Student Project for promoting Active Learning in Managerial Accounting and IT. In 2018 Fifth HCT Information Technology Trends (ITT) (pp. 117-125). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CTIT.2018.8649496
Brant, D. (2018). Weak connection between academia and the market harms Brazil in innovation ranking. Folha de São Paulo, UOL. Accessed on: 07 Apr 2020. https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/seminariosfolha/2018/08/conexao-fraca-entre-academia-e-mercado-prejudica-brasil-em-ranking-de-inovacao.shtml
Butterfield, A., Ngondi, G. E., & Kerr, A. (Eds.). (2016). A dictionary of computer science. Oxford University Press
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565074
Clark, K. B., & Wheelwright, S. C. (1992). Structuring the development funnel. Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality, Cap, 5, 111-132. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/2840125
Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S. J., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2000). New problems, new solutions: making portfolio management more effective. Research-Technology Management, 43(2), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2000.11671338
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (Eds.). (2018). The global innovation index 2018: Energizing the world with innovation. WIPO.
Gomes, A. (2018). The kanban guide for scrum teams. Scrum.org.
Grando, N. (2018). Methods, techniques and tools for innovation: knowledge, use and effectiveness in Brazilian companies (Doctoral dissertation, University of São Paulo). https://doi.org/10.11606/D.12.2017.tde-01122017-155036
Kim, J., & Wilemon, D. (2002). Focusing the fuzzy front–end in new product development. R&d Management, 32(4), 269-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00259
Kolychev, V. D., & Prokhorov, I. V. (2015). Conception, technology and methods of development of university system of innovation projects commercialization based on effectuation. Asian Social Science, 11(8), 44. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n8p44
Marcelino-Jesus, E., Majid, Z., Alves, D., Sarraipa, J., & Jardim-Goncalves, R. (2018, June). Innovations Assessment Methodology to Promote Knowledge Transfer. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion (pp. 248-255). https://doi.org/10.1145/3218585.3218668
Minor, D., Brook, P., & Bernoff, J. (2017). Data from 3.5 million employees shows how innovation really works. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2017/10/data-from-3-5-million-employees-shows-how-innovation-really-works
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. Nursing research: Principles and methods Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
Prodanov, C. C., & De Freitas, E. C. (2013). Methodology of scientific work: methods and techniques of research and academic work-2nd Edition. Publisher Feevale.
Salerno, M. S., de Vasconcelos Gomes, L. A., Da Silva, D. O., Bagno, R. B., & Freitas, S. L. T. U. (2015). Innovation processes: Which process for which project?. Technovation, 35, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.012
Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2011). The scrum guide. Scrum Alliance, 21(1), 1-38.
Servoss, J., Chang, C., Olson, D., Ward, K. R., Mulholland, M. W., & Cohen, M. S. (2018). The Surgery Innovation and Entrepreneurship Development Program (SIEDP): an experiential learning program for surgery faculty to ideate and implement innovations in health care. Journal of surgical education, 75(4), 935-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.017
Silva, D. O. D., Bagno, R. B., & Salerno, M. S. (2014). Models for innovation management: literature review and analysis. Production, 24, 477-490. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132013005000059
Vicente, A. J. O., Tan, T. A. G., & Yu, A. R. O. (2018). Collaborative approach in software engineering education: An interdisciplinary case. Journal of Information Technology Education. Innovations in Practice, 17, 127. https://doi.org/10.28945/4062
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hugo Vinícius Dantas Barreto, Hendrik Teixeira Macedo, Gilton José Ferreira da Silva, Bruno Otávio Piedade Prado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Abstract 299
- pdf 317
- pdf (Português (Brasil)) 66
