Plataforma digital para soluciones compartidas e innovaciones abiertas: propuesta de un modelo teórico estructurado
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/2024.24221Palabras clave:
innovación abierta, modelo de triple hélice, plataformas digitales, soluciones compartidas, método e-DelphiResumen
Objetivo: Este artículo tiene como objetivo presentar un modelo de plataforma digital colaborativa, estructurada para promover la mejora de las comunicaciones, la integración y la cooperación entre los agentes de la Triple Hélice (TH), en la construcción de soluciones compartidas y actividades de innovación abierta.
Proyecto / metodología / enfoque: El método e-Delphi aplicado en esta investigación está dirigido a identificar los niveles de consenso y disidencia entre los encuestados, cuando se les pregunta sobre la validación del modelo de plataforma propuesto.
Principales resultados: Los principales resultados muestran que el Índice de Validez de Contenido, el Coeficiente de Variación y el Rango Intercuartil fueron consistentes con el estándar recomendado (Okoli & Pawlowski, 2004; Polit & Beck, 2006; Alexandre & Coluci, 2011 y Miguel, 2012).
Limitaciones/implicaciones de la investigación:- La inserción de instrumentos facilitadores en los procesos endógenos de comunicación e integración puede contribuir a la efectividad del modelo TH. El modelo se propone en su forma teórica, como aporte académico, y los requisitos para su construcción se brindan en este documento.
Originalidad / valor: La relevancia de este artículo es corroborada por la aplicación sin precedentes del cálculo de tres indicadores estadísticos (CVI-CV-IR) en investigaciones con el método e-Delphi, y por la propuesta sin precedentes de un modelo de plataforma digital para compartir soluciones e innovaciones abiertas.
Contribuciones sociales / de gestión: Como aporte científico, la plataforma puede contribuir a mejorar la cooperación entre instituciones del modelo Triple Hélice, especialmente en actividades de soluciones compartidas e innovaciones abiertas. El modelo propuesto puede ser replicado, salvaguardando las adaptaciones necesarias a las diferentes realidades regionales.
Descargas
Citas
Alexandre, N.M. C.; Coluci, M. Z. O. (2011). Content validity in the construction and adaptation of measurement instruments. Collective Health and Science, v. 16, p. 3061-3068. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000800006
Ameyaw, E. E. et al. (2016). Application of Delphi method in construction engineering and management research: a quantitative perspective. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22(8), 991-1000. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.945953
Beatty, W. (2018). Four facts about all Statistics. In: Decision Support Using Nonparametric Statistics. Springer Briefs in Statistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68264-8_2
Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014) Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social
Change, v. 82, p. 42-51, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
Cantú, C., Corsaro, D. & Snehota, I., (2012). Roles of actors in combining resources into complex solutions. Journal of Business Research, 65(2), pp.139-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.05.013
Chesbrough, H. V. (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology Harvard Business Press.
Chesbrough, H. (2006) Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation. In: 10th Anniversary Summer Conference on Dynamics of Industry and Innovation: Organizations, Networks and Systems, Copenhagen, 27-29 June 2005, 1-12.
Cortez, R.M. & Johnston, W.J., (2017). The future of B2B marketing theory: A historical and prospective analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 66, pp.90-102. » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.07.017
Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Crupi, A., Del Sarto, N., Di Minin, A., Phaal, R. & Piccaluga, A. (2021), "Open innovation environments as knowledge sharing enablers: the case of strategic technology and innovative management consortium", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 1263-1286. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2020-0419
Cunha, J.; Benneworth, P. (2013). Universities’ contributions to social innovation: towards a theoretical framework. In: EURA Conference 2013. https://hdl.handle.net/1822/25957
Dameri, R.P., (2013). Searching for smart city definition: a comprehensive proposal. International Journal of computers & technology, 11(5), pp.2544-2551. https://doi.or/10.24297/ijct.v11i5.1142
D'Avila, J.C., Bilessimo, S.M.S., Esteves, P.C.L. & de Vargas, C.M., (2015). The Triple Helix as a factor of regional development: A case study in Brazil. ESPACIOS| Vol. 36 (Nº 11) Año 2015. (in Portuguese). https://www.revistaespacios.com/a15v36n11/15361117.html
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (Eds.). (2018). Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the world with innovation. Geneva and New Delhi: World Intellectual Property Organization, Confederation of Indian Industry.
Eberhart, M.E. & Pascuci, L., (2014). The decision-making process and its implications for university, business and government cooperation: a case study. University Management Magazine in Latin America-GUAL, 7(2), pp.221-242. https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/gual/article/view/31428
Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university-industry-governmental relations. Res. Pol., 29 (2) (2000), pp. 109-123
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: the Triple Helix of university- industry-government relations. Soc. Sci. Inf., 42 (3) (2003), pp. 293-337
Etzkowitz, H. J., Dzisah, M. Ranga, C. Zhou (2007). The Triple Helix model of innovation. university – industry – government interaction. Asia Pac. Tech Monitor, 24 (1) (2007), pp. 14-23
Etzkowitz, H., (2017). Innovation Lodestar: The entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge firmament. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, pp.122-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.026
Etzkowitz, H., (2016). The entrepreneurial university: vision and metrics. Industry and Higher Education, 30(2), pp.83-97. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.5367/ihe.2016.0303
Etzkowitz, H. & Ranga, M., (2010). A Triple Helix system for knowledge-based regional development: from “spheres” to “spaces”. In VIII Triple Helix Conference (pp. 1-29).
Etzkowitz, H. & Zhou, C., (2017). The triple helix: University–industry–government innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge. http://mguntur.id/files/ebook/ebook_1605608206_cf742d707b4e0bf22bf3.pdf
Fedotova, O., Teixeira, L. & Alvelos, H., (2012). E-participation in Portugal: evaluation of government electronic platforms. Procedia Technology, 5, pp.152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.017
Ferreira, C., & Lemos, D. da C. (2022). Networks to promote collaboration on the front end of innovation: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Innovation - IJI, São Paulo, 10(2), 267- 290. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i2.21525
Flostrand, A., (2017). Finding the future: Crowdsourcing versus the Delphi technique. Business Horizons, 60(2), pp.229-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.11.007
Grillitsch, M. & Sotarauta, M., (2018). Regional growth paths: From structure to agency and back. Papers in Innovation Studies, 1, pp.1-23. http://wp.circle.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/201801_grillitsch_et_al.pdf
Hasson, F. & Keeney, S. (2011). “Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 78 No. 9, pp. 1695-1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005
International Telecommunications Union – ITU-T. (2015), Focus group on smart sustainable cities. Available at: www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/ssc/Pages/default.aspx
Kaniak, V.; Takahashi, R. W. (2018). Success and failure in implementing the triple helix model in the world: a meta-synthesis. In: South American administration Congress. Sucre. Anais ... Bolivia. (in Portuguese).
https://admpg2018.com.br/anais/2018/arquivos/05052018_190505_5aee2acda528e.pdf
Kapetaniou, C. & Lee, S.H., (2017). A framework for assessing the performance of universities: The case of Cyprus. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, pp.169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.015
Kindt, A.‐M., Geissler, M., & Bühling, K. (2022). Be my (little) partner?!—Universities' role in regional innovation systems when large firms are rare. Journal of Regional Science, 62, 1274 1295. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12596
Klafke, R.V., Pilatti, L.A., Ditkun, S., Diuba & Xavier, J.P.F., (2014). Innovation on the agenda: Challenges for effective integration in the management of the agents that make up the triple helix. ESPACIOS| Vol. 35 (Nº 12) Año 2014. (in Portuguese).
https://www.revistaespacios.com/a14v35n12/14351220.html
Kobza, N. & Mutlucan, C., (2016). Entrepreneurship leading a change in Europe: a perspective of young professionals. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(29), pp.289-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.081
Landeta, J., Barrutia, J. & Lertxundi, A., (2011). Hybrid Delphi: A methodology to facilitate contribution from experts in professional contexts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), pp.1629-1641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.009
Lee, Y.H. & Kim, Y., (2016). Analyzing interaction in R&D networks using the Triple Helix method: Evidence from industrial R&D programs in Korean government. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, pp.93-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.017
Leydesdorff, L. & Zawdie, G., (2010). The triple helix perspective of innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(7), pp.789-804. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2010.511142
Leydesdorff and Ivanova, (2016). “Open innovation” and “triple helix” models
of innovation: can synergy in innovation systems be measured? Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity (2016) 2:11. DOI https://doi.or/10.1186/s40852-016-0039-7
Linstone, H.A. & Turoff, M. (1975), The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA. » https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162510002155
Lund, B. (2020). "Review of the Delphi method in library and information science research", Journal of Documentation, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-09-2019-0178
Maier, M.; Chowdhury, M.; Rimal, B. P. e Van, D. P. (2016). The tactile internet: vision, recent progress, and open challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, v. 54, n. 5, p. 138-145. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=7470948
Manzini, E. (2014). Making things happen: Social innovation and design. Design issues, 30(1), 57-66. » http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00248
Martin, B. R. (2012). The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research Policy, v. 41, n. 7, p. 1219-1239, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.012
Meza, M.L.F.G. & Bastos, A., (2018). The role of the university in the Paraná innovation system from 2005 to 2015: the case of UTFPR. PerCursos, 19(40), pp.317-347. (in Portuguese). https://doi.org/10.5965/1984724619402018317
Miguel, P.A.C (Organizador). (2012). Research Methodology in Production Engineering and Operations Management, 2. ed. Elsevier Editora. São Paulo, SP.
Okoli, C. & Pawlowski, S.D., (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & management, 42(1), pp.15-29. » https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/976864/1/OkoliPawlowski2004DelphiPostprint.pdf
Pearce, J., Albritton, S., Grant, G., Steed, G., & Zelenika, I. (2012). A new model for enabling innovation in appropriate technology for sustainable development. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 8(2), 42-53.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908095
Pigola, A., Costa, P. R., Mazieri, M. R., & Scafuto, I. C. (2022). Inovação colaborativa: uma perspectiva tecnológica. International Journal of Innovation -IJI, São Paulo, 10(2), 204-211. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i2.22256
Pigola, A., Costa, P. R., Mazieri, M. R., & Scafuto, I. C. (2022, July). The transfer of technology from the organizational viewpoint. International Journal of Innovation -IJI, São Paulo, 10(Special issue), 379-383. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i3.22435
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C.T., (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 29(5), pp.489-497. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/nur.20147
Praharaj, S., Han, J.H. & Hawken, S., (2017). Innovative civic engagement and digital urban infrastructure: lessons from 100 smart cities mission in India. Procedia engineering, 180, pp.1423-1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.305
Reguant, M. & Torrado, M., (2016). El método Delphi. REIRE. Revista d’Innovación i Recerca en Educación, 9(1), pp.87-102. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0830-7854
Sæbø, Ø., Flak, L.S. & Sein, M.K., (2011). Understanding the dynamics in e-Participation initiatives: Looking through the genre and stakeholder lenses. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), pp.416-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.10.005
Sarpong, D., AbdRazak, A., Alexander, E. and Meissner, D., (2017). Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, pp.142-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.032
Schmidt, D.M., Böttcher, L., Wilberg, J., Kammerl, D. and Lindemann, U., (2016). Modeling Transfer of Knowledge in an Online Platform of a Cluster. Procedia CIRP, 50, pp.348-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.036
Scuotto, V., Ferraris, A. & Bresciani, S., (2016). Internet of Things: Applications and challenges in smart cities: a case study of IBM smart city projects. Business Process Management Journal, 22(2), pp.357-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-05-2015-0074
Strand et al., (2017). Strand, I. Ivanova, L. Leydesdorff. Decomposing the triple-helix synergy into the regional innovation systems of Norway: firm data and patent networks. Qual. Quantity, 51 (2017), pp. 963-988
Strasser, A. (2017). Delphi method variants in information systems research: Taxonomy development and application. Available in: http://www.ejbrm.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=467
Vanhaverbeke, W. (2006). “The interorganizational context of open innovation,” Open
innovation: Researching a new paradigm, pp. 205-19. Available in:
Vilarinho, T. et al. (2018). Experimenting a Digital Collaborative Platform for Supporting Social Innovation in Multiple Settings. In:
Hodoň, M., Eichler, G., Erfurth, C., Fahrnberger, G. (eds) Innovations for Community Services. I4CS 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 863. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93408-2_11
Verlinde, S. & Macharis, C., (2016). Innovation in urban freight transport: The triple Helix model. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, pp.1250-1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.196
Wimmer, M.A., Furdik, K., Bicking, M., Mach, M., Sabol, T., Butka, P. (2012). Open Collaboration in Policy Development: Concept and Architecture to Integrate Scenario Development and Formal Policy Modelling. In: Charalabidis, Y., Koussouris, S. (eds) Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27219-6_11
Xu, H., Zeng, R., Fang, S., Yue, Z., & Han, Z. (2017). Measurement Methods and Application Research of Triple Helix Model in Collaborative Innovation Management. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods In Libraries, 4(2), 463-482. Retrieved from http://www.qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/261
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Antônio Honorato de Oliveira
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
