Inovação em políticas públicas: um estudo bibliométrico para novas pesquisas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v9i3.19676Palavras-chave:
Inovação, Políticas públicas, Ambiente de inovação, Gestão da inovação, Bibliometria.Resumo
Objetivo: Realizar um mapeamento de estudos sobre inovação e políticas públicas, apresentando um panorama da discussão científica sobre o tema para sugerir propostas de estudos futuros.
Desenho / metodologia / abordagem: Estudo bibliométrico, por meio de análise fatorial exploratória, com o objetivo de identificar o caminho que o fenômeno percorre. Para isso, utilizamos as técnicas de citação, cocitação e pareamento bibliográfico.
Originalidade: Dada a importância econômica, social e tecnológica da inovação, as políticas públicas aparecem como motores do desenvolvimento da inovação, reforçando assim a necessidade de identificar caminhos inexplorados por meio do mapeamento de estudos sobre o tema para identificar caminhos inexplorados.
Resultados: Identificamos as bases sobre as quais o tema estudado foi desenvolvido. Assim, três fatores foram observados: Desenvolvimento Econômico, Ecossistemas de Inovação e Participação do Estado. Na análise de pareamento, identificamos quatro fatores, a saber: Empreendedorismo, Mudanças nas Políticas Públicas, Redes e Clusters e Fonte de Conhecimento. Olhando para o futuro, algumas tendências de estudos foram apresentadas, destacando uma nova agenda de pesquisa.
Contribuições teórico-metodológicas: Foram apresentadas algumas tendências de estudos sobre inovação e políticas públicas, garantindo uma nova agenda de pesquisa.
Contribuições para gestão: Esta pesquisa permite que gestores e tomadores de decisão compreendam os aspectos que envolvem o tema, para que possam desenvolver ações estratégicas de inovação com o apoio de políticas públicas.
Downloads
Referências
Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). The resource‐based theory: dissemination and main trends. Strategic management journal, 27(7), 621-636. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.532
Acs, Z. J., & Amorós, J. E. (2008). Introducción: El proceso de creación de empresas. Estudios de economía, 35(2), 121-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52862008000200001
Amponsah, C. T., & Adams, S. (2017). Open innovation: Systematisation of knowledge exploration and exploitation for commercialisation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(03), 1750027. https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391961750027X
Arora, A., & Cohen, W. M. (2015). Public support for technical advance: the role of firm size. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(4), 791-802. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtv028
Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic learning implications of by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295952
Benavides, L. M. C., Tamayo Arias, J. A., Arango Serna, M. D., Branch Bedoya, J. W., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 20(11), 3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291
Boushey, G. (2012). Punctuated equilibrium theory and the diffusion of innovations. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00437.x
Cancino, C. A., Merigó, J. M., & Coronado, F. C. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of leading universities in innovation research. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(3), 106-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.03.006
Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research policy, 26(4-5), 475-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
Culnan, M. J., O'Reilly III, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1990). Intellectual structure of research in organizational behavior, 1972–1984: A cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac20142022
Dini, M., & Stumpo, G. (2011). Políticas para la innovación en las pequeñas y medianas empresas en América Latina [Documentos de Proyectos, Nº 403]. Economic Comission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Cepal, 167.
Emodi, N. V., Murthy, G. P., Emodi, C. C., & Emodi, A. S. A. (2017). Factors influencing innovation and industrial performance in Chinese manufacturing industry. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14(06), 1750040. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877017500407
Fagerberg, J. (1994). Technology and international differences in growth rates. Journal of economic Literature, 32(3), 1147-1175.
Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research policy, 41(7), 1132-1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.008
Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies—The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research policy, 38(2), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.006
Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2020). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389
Figueiredo, P. N. (2016). Evolution of the short-fiber technological trajectory in Brazil's pulp and paper industry: The role of firm-level innovative capability-building and indigenous institutions. Forest Policy and Economics, 64, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.12.008
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology, policy, and economic performance: lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
Freeman, C. (1994). The economics of technical change. Cambridge journal of economics, 18(5), 463-514.
Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of economics, 19(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309
Gomez, J., & Vargas, P. (2009). The effect of financial constraints, absorptive capacity and complementarities on the adoption of multiple process technologies. Research Policy, 38(1), 106-119. https://doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.013
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate data analysis, 7th Pearson new international ed. Harlow: Pearson.
Heikkila, T., Pierce, J. J., Gallaher, S., Kagan, J., Crow, D. A., & Weible, C. M. (2014). Understanding a period of policy change: The case of hydraulic fracturing disclosure policy in Colorado. Review of Policy Research, 31(2), 65-87. https://doi:10.1111/ropr.12058
Holyoke, T. T., Henig, J. R., Brown, H., & Lacireno-Paquet, N. (2009). Policy dynamics and the evolution of state charter school laws. Policy Sciences, 42(1), 33-55. https://doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9077-3
Kasabov, E., & Delbridge, R. (2008). Innovation, embeddedness and policy: evidence from life sciences in three UK regions. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20(2), 185-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537320801931671
Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American documentation, 14(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
Kingdon, J. W., & Stano, E. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, 45, 165-169. Boston: Little, Brown.
Komlósi, É., Szerb, L., Ács, Z. J., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Quality-related regional differences in entrepreneurship based on the GEDI methodology: The case of Hungary. Acta Oeconomica, 65(3), 455-477. https://doi.org/10.1556 / 032.65.2015.3.6
Laranja, M., Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2008). Policies for science, technology and innovation: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting. Research policy, 37(5), 823-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.006
Lecluyse, L., Knockaert, M., & Spithoven, A. (2019). The contribution of science parks: A literature review and future research agenda. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 559-595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-09712-x
Lew, Y. K., Khan, Z., & Cozzio, S. (2018). Gravitating toward the quadruple helix: international connections for the enhancement of a regional innovation system in Northeast Italy. R&D Management, 48(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12227
Li, J., Xia, J., & Zajac, E. J. (2017). On the duality of political and economic stakeholder influence on firm innovation performance: Theory and evidence from Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1), 193-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2697
Lichtenberg, F. R., & Siegel, D. (1991). The impact of R&D investment on productivity–New evidence using linked R&D–LRD data. Economic inquiry, 29(2), 203-229. https://doi.org/10.3386/w2901
Lin, T. Y., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2010). Exploring the Knowledge Network of Strategic Alliance Research: A Co-citation Analysis. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 8(2).
Lucas Jr, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of monetary economics, 22(1), 3-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). National innovation systems—analytical concept and development tool. Industry and innovation, 14(1), 95-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710601130863
Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research policy, 31(2), 247-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00139-1
Martin, B. R. (2012). The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research policy, 41(7), 1219-1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.012
Mas-Tur, A., & Soriano, D. R. (2014). The level of innovation among young innovative companies: the impacts of knowledge-intensive services use, firm characteristics and the entrepreneur attributes. Service Business, 8(1), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-013-0186-x
Mazzucato, M. (2015). Innovation systems: from fixing market failures to creating markets. Revista do Serviço Público, 66(4), 627-640.
McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American society for information science, 41(6), 433-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365089016005007
Mendonça, H. L., & Fonseca, M. V. D. A. (2018). Working towards a framework based on mission-oriented practices for assessing renewable energy innovation policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 709-719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.064
Minniti, M. (2008). The role of government policy on entrepreneurial activity: productive, unproductive, or destructive?. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice, 32(5), 779-790. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00255.x
Mintrom, M. (2013). Policy entrepreneurs and controversial science: Governing human embryonic stem cell research. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(3), 442-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.761514
Moilanen, M., Østbye, S., & Woll, K. (2014). Non-R&D SMEs: external knowledge, absorptive capacity and product innovation. Small Business Economics, 43(2), 447-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9545-9
Pathak, S., Xavier-Oliveira, E., & Laplume, A. O. (2013). Influence of intellectual property, foreign investment, and technological adoption on technology entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2090-2101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.035
Prasad, S., & Tata, J. (2005). Publication patterns concerning the role of teams/groups in the information systems literature from 1990 to 1999. Information & Management, 42(8), 1137-1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.003
Podsakoff, P. M.; Mackenzie, S. B.; Bachrach, D. G.; Podsakoff, N. P. (2005). The Influence of Management Journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, v. 26, n. 5, pp. 473-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.454
Ramos‐Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic management journal, 25(10), 981-1004. https://doi.org/10.2307/20142173
Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of political economy, 94(5), 1002-1037. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71-S102. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3210
Schmitz, H., & Altenburg, T. (2016). Innovation paths in Europe and Asia: Divergence or convergence?. Science and Public Policy, 43(4), 454-463. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv053
Schubert, C. (2015). What Do We Mean When We Say That Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Policy) Increase “Welfare”?. Journal of Economic Issues, 49(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2015.1013859
Serra, F. A. R., Ferreira, M. P., Guerrazzi, L. A. D. C., & Scaciotta, V. V. (2018). Doing bibliometric reviews for the Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management. Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management, 17(03), 01-16. https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v17i3.2713
Sherwood, A. L., & Covin, J. G. (2008). Knowledge acquisition in university–industry alliances: An empirical investigation from a learning theory perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(2), 162-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00292.x
Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
Thurik, A. R., Stam, E., & Audretsch, D. B. (2013). The rise of the entrepreneurial economy and the future of dynamic capitalism. Technovation, 33(8-9), 302-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.07.003
Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2010). Understanding the innovation impacts of public procurement. European planning studies, 18(1), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903343567
Visser, E. J., & Atzema, O. (2008). With or without clusters: Facilitating innovation through a differentiated and combined network approach. European Planning Studies, 16(9), 1169-1188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802401573
Vogel, R., & Güttel, W. H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 426-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12000
Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American political science review, 63(3), 880-899. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954434
Weisz, J. (2006). Mecanismos de apoio à inovação tecnológica. Brasília: SENAI/DN.
Willoughby, K. W. (2020). Endogenous innovation, outward-bound international patenting and national economic development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(3), 844-869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9705-1
Wonglimpiyarat, J. (2017). Tax and S&T Policies for Research Commercialization: Perspectives of Southeast Asian Countries. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14(04), 1750017. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877017500171
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Innovation – IJI
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do texto na da revista;
O(s) autor(es) garantem que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, idéias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder a ajustes textuais e de adequação às normas da publicação.
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) em http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
