Influence strategy in the JBS and Odebrecht groups
scope of action and strategic objectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/2024.24896Keywords:
influence strategy, non-market strategy, JBS, Odebrecht, lobbyingAbstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to identify and categorize influence strategy objectives pursued by JBS and Odebrecht in order to gain a competitive advantage in their relationship with the State.
Theoretical framework: Beyond the theoretical perspective of the non-market strategy, and based on economic sociology, the concept of influence strategy was used to analyze social, political, and economic relations between the State and corporations.
Method: We employed a ‘structure analysis’ for the identified events, based on over 35 hours of video recordings with 27 executives from the aforementioned companies.
Results: We identified 23 cases of influence strategies, in which private actors used complex actions in Company-State relations in search of gains from sources of competitive advantages.
Conclusion: Three common strategic goals were identified: i) contract winning; ii) regulation/exemption; iii) influence on the public bureaucracy at the municipal, state, and federal levels.
Downloads
References
Aidt, T., Dutta, J., & Sena, V. (2008). Governance regimes, corruption and growth: Theory and evidence. Journal of comparative economics, 36(2), 195-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2007.11.004
Bansal, P., & Hoffman, A. J. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment. Oxford University Press.
Baron, D. P. (2016). Strategy beyond markets: A step back and a look forward. In Strategy beyond markets (Vol. 34, pp. 1-54). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220160000034002
Baron, D. P. (1999). Integrated market and nonmarket strategies in client and interest group politics. Business and Politics, 1(1), 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1515/bap.1999.1.1.7
Baron, D. P. (1995a). Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California management review, 37(2), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165788
Baron, D. P. (1995b). The nonmarket strategy system. MIT Sloan Management Review, 37(1), 73.
Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (2017). Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som: um manual prático. Editora Vozes Limitada.
Baumgartner, F. R. (1996). Public interest groups in France and the United States. Governance, 9(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1996.tb00231.x
Bell, E., & Leonard, P. (2018). Digital organizational storytelling on YouTube: Constructing plausibility through network protocols of amateurism, affinity, and authenticity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492616660765
Berry, J. M. (1989). The Interest Group Society. Boston: Scott, Foresman. Little Brown Series in Political Science.
Bucheli, M., & DeBerge, T. (2023). Multinational enterprises’ nonmarket strategies: Insights from History. International Business
Review, 102198.
Coelho, C. C., & Barros, A. (2021). Padrinhos e caciques: o lado sombrio da atividade política corporativa na captura do Estado. RECADM, 20(1), 15-42. https://doi.org/10.21529/RECADM.2021001
de Lima, M. D. X., Prazeres, R. V. D., Araújo, J. G. D., & Lagioia, U. C. T. (2016). Um estudo sobre as doações realizadas pelas companhias de capital aberto aos partidos políticos nas eleições brasileiras em 2014. Revista Ambiente Contábil, 8(2), 249-262.
Doh, J. P., Lawton, T. C., & Rajwani, T. (2012). Advancing nonmarket strategy research: Institutional perspectives in a changing world. Academy of management perspectives, 26(3), 22-39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0041
Dutt, P., & Traca, D. (2010). Corruption and bilateral trade flows: extortion or evasion?. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 843-860. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00034
Eden, C. (2004). Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(3), 673-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00431-4
Faria, A., Abdalla, M. M., & Guedes, A. L. (2021). Can we co-construct a field of management/administration engaged with the majority?. Organizações & Sociedade, 28, 549-581. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-92302021v28n9804EN
Faria, A., & Abdalla, M. M. (2014). O que é (estratégia de) não mercado? Organizações & Sociedade, 21, 315-333. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-92302014000200007
Ferreira, R. F. C. (2018). Estratégia de influência: o ganho de vantagens competitivas de empresas em suas relações com o Estado. [Doctoral dissertation]. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. http://hdl.handle.net/1843/38871
Ferreira, R. F. C., Vilela, B. de A., Muniz, R. M. & Gonçalves, C. A. (2020). Estratégia de Influência: Proposição de um conceito teórico para compreensão das relações entre empresas e Estado. XXIII SEMEAD, São Paulo.
Finger, M. D. O. (2019). A atuação Política das Empresas: Um Estudo de Caso Brasileiro [Doctoral dissertation]. Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal). http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/19433
Fligstein, N. (2018). The architecture of markets. In The Architecture of Markets. Princeton University Press.
Fligstein, N. (2001). Mercado como política: uma abordagem político-cultural das instituições de mercado. Contemporaneidade e Educação, 6(9), 26-55.
Fligstein, N. (1996). Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions. American sociological review, 656-673. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/9780470755679
Fligstein, N., & Dauter, L. (2007). The sociology of markets. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 33, 105-128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131736
Freitas, J. S. (2014). Eventos críticos para a formação de centros tecnológicos de origem acadêmica. [Doctoral dissertation]. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-9NSL2D
Galiazzi, M. C., & Sousa, R. S. (2019). A dialética na categorização da análise textual discursiva: o movimento recursivo entre palavra e conceito. Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa, 7(13), 01-22. https://doi.org/10.33361/RPQ.2019.v.7.n.13.227
Hall, P. A. (2008). Systematic process analysis: When and how to use it. European political science, 7(3), 304-317. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210130
Heise, D. R. (1989). Modeling event structures. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 14(2-3), 139-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1989.9990048
Heise, D. R., & Durig, A. (1997). A frame for organizational actions and macroactions. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 22(2), 95-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1997.9990197
Henisz, W. J., & Zelner, B. A. (2012). Strategy and competition in the market and nonmarket arenas. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0052
Hodgkinson, G. P., & Healey, M. P. (2008). Cognition in organizations. Annual review of psychology, 59(1), 387-417. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093612
Houston, D. A. (2007). Can corruption ever improve and economy. Cato J., 27, 325.
Ismayil, Y., & Tunçalp, D. (2023). Research in new ventures' nonmarket strategies: contributions and opportunities. Management Review Quarterly, 1-46.
Junior, G. A. (2020). Impactos da operação “lava jato” no estado democrático de direito e a necessária aprovação da lei de abuso de autoridade como garantia de direitos fundamentais. International Journal of Digital Law, 1(2), 15-18.
https://doi.org/10.47975/IJDL.20.andreassajr
King, B. G., & Jasper, J. M. (2022). Strategic interactions and arenas: A sociological perspective on strategy. Strategic Organization, 20(4), 810-820. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270221134285
Lawton, T. C., & Rajwani, T. S. (Eds.). (2015). The Routledge companion to non-market strategy. Routledge.
Lazzarini, S. G. (2007). Mudar tudo para não mudar nada: análise da dinâmica de redes de proprietários no Brasil como "mundos pequenos". RAE eletrônica, 6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-56482007000100007
Lazzarini, S. G. (2011). Capitalismo de laços: os donos do Brasil e suas conexões. Elsevier.
Lazzarini, S. G. (2015). Strategizing by the government: Can industrial policy create firm‐level competitive advantage?. Strategic Management Journal, 36(1), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2204
Loch, M., & Günther, H. F. (2015). Estratégias de não mercado: uma revisão integrativa. Revista de Administração FACES Journal, 14(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.21714/1984-6975FACES2015V14N1ART1985
Lowenberg, J. S. (1993). Interpretive research methodology: Broadening the dialogue. Advances in Nursing Science, 16(2), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-199312000-00006
Mahoney, J. (2000). Strategies of causal inference in small-N analysis. Sociological methods & research, 28(4), 387-424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124100028004001
Mahoney, J., Kimball, E., & Koivu, K. L. (2009). The logic of historical explanation in the social sciences. Comparative Political Studies, 42(1), 114-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008325433
Massot, P. (2021). The state of the study of the market in political economy: China’s rise shines light on conceptual shortcomings. Competition & change, 25(5), 534-560. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529420965523
Maurer, A. (2020). Handbook of Economic Sociology for the 21st century. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-61619-9
McChesney, F. S. (1997). Money for nothing: politicians, rent extraction, and political extortion. Harvard University Press.
McWilliams, A., Rupp, D. E., Siegel, D. S., Stahl, G. K., & Waldman, D. A. (Eds.). (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility: Psychological and organizational perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Mennell, S. (1998). Norbert Elias: an introduction. University College Dublin Press.
Méon, P. G., & Sekkat, K. (2005). Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth?. Public choice, 122(1), 69-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-3988-0
Méon, P. G., & Weill, L. (2010). Is corruption an efficient grease?. World development, 38(3), 244-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.004
Moraes, R. (1999). Análise de conteúdo. Revista Educação, 7-32.
Norburn, D. (1997). PEST analysis. Blackwell encyclopedia of strategic management. Oxford Blackwell.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press.
Olson, M. (1989). Collective action. In The invisible hand (pp. 61-69). Palgrave Macmillan.
Passos, A. P. P. D., Meneghini, E. M. P., Gama, M. A. B., & Lana, J. (2021). Tem no Magalu: Estratégias Sociais, Políticas e de Mercado Durante a COVID-19. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 25. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2021200233.por
Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. The Journal of Law and Economics, 19(2), 211-240. https://www.jstor.org/stable/725163
Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755679.ch4
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of notions. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73-93.
Przeworski, A. (2011). Money, politics, and democracy. [Trabalho apresentado no Departamento de Ciência Política da USP]. Universidade de São Paulo.
Salisbury, R. H. (1975). Interest groups. Handbook of political science, 4, 171-228. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2083192
Sarte, P. D. G. (2000). Informality and rent-seeking bureaucracies in a model of long-run growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 46(1), 173-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(00)00020-9
Silva, A. O. D., & Abdalla, M. M. (2020). Desenvolvimento? Para quem? Relações estratégicas entre empresa e sociedade: o lado obscuro da privatização da Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (CSN). REAd. Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 26, 49-80. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-2311.276.95590
Skocpol, T. (2008). Bringing the state back in: Retrospect and prospect the 2007 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 31(2), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00204.x
Smelser, N. J., & Swedberg, R. (2005). The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835584
Stigler, G. J. (2021). The theory of economic regulation. In The Political Economy (pp. 67-81). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315495811
Sun, P., Doh, J. P., Rajwani, T., & Siegel, D. (2021). Navigating cross-border institutional complexity: A review and assessment of multinational nonmarket strategy research. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(9), 1818-1853.
Swedberg, R. (2021). The Classic Tradition in Economic Sociology. In Handbook of Economic Sociology for the 21st Century (pp. 3-17). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61619-9_1
Truman, D. B. (2003). The governmental process: Political interests and public opinion. The Democracy Sourcebook. MIT Press. https://lccn.loc.gov/78150772
Vaal, A. D., & Ebben, W. (2011). Institutions and the relation between corruption and economic growth. Review of Development Economics, 15(1), 108-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2010.00596.x
Whittington, R. (1992). Putting Giddens into action: social systems and managerial agency. Journal of management studies, 29(6), 693-712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00685.x
Winkler, D. M., & Krzeminska, A. (2024). How Context Matters in Non‐market Strategies: Exploring Variations in Corporate Social Responsibility‐Political Activity Relationships. Journal of Management Studies.
Yi, J., Hong, J., Chung Hsu, W., & Wang, C. (2017). The role of state ownership and institutions in the innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: Evidence from China. Technovation, 62, 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.04.002
Yin, R. K. (2015). Estudo de Caso: Planejamento e métodos. Bookman Editora
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rui Fernando Correia Ferreira, Felipe Fróes Couto, Lívia Almada Neves, Bruno de Almeida Vilela
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.