Bibliometric analysis into a decade of academic research on innovation, value creation, and sustainability (2013-2023)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/2024.26353

Keywords:

bibliometric analysis, innovation, value creation, sustainability

Abstract

Objective of the Study: The aim of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of academic publications to evaluate the growth, impact, and trends in research related to innovation, value, and sustainability between 2013 and 2023.

Methodology/Approach: The study utilizes a bibliometric approach, analysing data from SCOPUS and Web of Science databases to track scientific output, citation trends, authorship patterns, institutional affiliations, and country contributions within the specified research domain and time frame.

Originality/Relevance: This study provides an analysis of the interconnected themes of innovation, value creation, and sustainability within academic literature. The relevance of this research lies in understanding the evolving scholarly landscape and identifying key contributors and trends in these critical areas.

Main Results: The analysis reveals a consistent growth in scientific output, with an increase in publications in 2022 and a peak in 2023, indicating a burgeoning research interest. Citation trends demonstrate variations, highlighting the dynamic nature of research and increasing scholarly engagement in these themes over time.

Theoretical/Methodological Contributions: The findings contribute to the theoretical understanding of innovation, value creation, and sustainability by mapping out key themes, trends, and research dynamics. The study also showcases the interdisciplinary nature of these fields and the collaborative efforts shaping academic discourse.

Social/Management Contributions: The study's insights have managerial implications, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and highlighting influential institutions and countries in advancing research agendas. Understanding citation patterns and thematic evolution can inform strategic decision-making and foster meaningful contributions to societal and environmental challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marcelo Neves Gonçalves, University of Mackenzie / São Paulo, SP

Holder of a Master's degree in Business Administration from the University of Mackenzie and a Bachelor's degree in Business Administration from the University of São Paulo (FEA-USP). With 40 years of professional experience in executive roles in major corporations, I possess 13 years of experience in academic management of undergraduate and postgraduate (MBA) courses in the areas of Administration, Accounting, and Economics. I have structured Course Pedagogical Projects, participated in various evaluation processes, course authorization, and recognition, as well as institutional recognition with the MEC. My career has primarily focused on Finance, Strategy, and Marketing. My main research interests relate to Financial Performance, ESG Practices, the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Marketing Strategies, Digital Accessibility, and Social Inclusion. Currently, I am pursuing a Doctorate in Business Administration from the University of Mackenzie, specializing in Strategic Finance.

Basso, L. F. C., University of Mackenzie / São Paulo, SP

He holds a degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Aeronautics Institute of Technology (1974), specialization in Economic Theory from the University of São Paulo (1978), master's degree in Economics from the New School for Social Research (1981), Ph.D. in Economics from the New School for Social Research (1984), and postdoctoral studies at Bielefeld University (1993). He is currently a full professor at Mackenzie University, receiving financial support from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development. He serves as a project reviewer for the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, as well as for Ritsumeikan University, the Mackenzie Presbyterian University, the Association of National Postgraduate Centers, and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel. His expertise lies in the field of Economics, with a focus on Economic Theory, particularly in topics related to exchange rates, monetary economics, and currency value.

References

Aksoy, L., Buoye, A. J., Fors, M., Keiningham, T. L., & Rosengren, S. (2022). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) metrics do not serve services customers: a missing link between sustainability metrics and customer perceptions of social innovation. Journal of Service Management, 33(4–5), 565 – 577. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-11-2021-0428

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2017.08.007

Beck, D., & Ferasso, M. (2023). How can Stakeholder Capitalism contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals? A Cross-network Literature Analysis. Ecological Economics, 204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107673

Bernal-Torres, C. A., Torres-Guevara, L. E., Aldana-Bernal, J. C., Nicolás-Rojas, Y. W., & Pando-Ezcurra, T. T. (2023). The Moderating Role of Innovation in the Relationship Between Business Sustainability and Organizational Performance in Companies of an

Emerging Economy. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231217870

Bhattacharya, A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2023). Integrating ESG Pillars for Business Model Innovation in the Biopharmaceutical Industry. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 17(1), 127 – 150. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v17i1.12

Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85–86.

Broadstock, D. C., Matousek, R., Meyer, M., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility impact firms’ innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 119, 99 – 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.014

Cadamuro Morgante, F., Gholamzadehmir, M., Sdino, L., & Rosasco, P. (2023). How to invest in the “Market of Sustainability”: evaluating the impacts of a real estate investment across ESG criteria [Investire nel “Mercato sostenibile”: Valutare gli impatti di un investimento immobiliare attraverso i criteri ESG]. Valori e Valutazioni, 33, 65–84. https://doi.org/10.48264/VVSIEV-20233306

Cardoni, A., Kiseleva, E., & Taticchi, P. (2020). In Search of Sustainable Value: A Structured Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(2), 615. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020615

Chong, T., & Loh, L. (2023). Innovating ESG Integration as Sustainable Strategy: ESG Transparency and Firm Valuation in the Palm Oil Sector. Sustainability, 15(22), 15943. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215943

Chouaibi, S., & Chouaibi, J. (2021). Social and ethical practices and firm value: the moderating effect of green innovation: evidence from international ESG data. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 37(3), 442–465. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-12-2020-0203

Derks, M., Berkers, F., & Tukker, A. (2022). Toward Accelerating Sustainability Transitions through Collaborative Sustainable Business Modeling: A Conceptual Approach. Sustainability, 14(7), 3803. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073803

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Eccles, R. G., Lee, L. E., & Stroehle, J. C. (2020). The Social Origins of ESG: An Analysis of Innovest and KLD. Organization and Environment, 33(4), 575–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619888994

Espinosa-Méndez, C., Maquieira, C. P., & Arias, J. T. (2023). The Impact of ESG Performance on the Value of Family Firms: The Moderating Role of Financial Constraints and Agency Problems. Sustainability, 15(7), 6176. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076176

E-Vahdati, S., & Binesh, F. (2022). The impact of CEO’s attributes on R&D intensity and ESG practices. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 51(3), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2021.1944459

Ezuma, R. E. M. R., & Matthew, N. K. (2022). The perspectives of stakeholders on the effectiveness of green financing schemes in Malaysia. Green Finance, 4(4), 450–473. https://doi.org/10.3934/gf.2022.2022022

Foti, V. T., & Timpanaro, G. (2021). Relationships, sustainability and agri-food purchasing behaviour in farmer markets in Italy. British Food Journal, 123(13), 428–453. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2021-0358

Hara, T., Tsuru, S., & Yasui, S. (2022). A Mathematical Model of Value Co-Creation Dynamics Using a Leverage Mechanism. Sustainability, 14(11), 6531. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116531

Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17(2), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2003.10025194

Hood, W. W., & Wilson, C. S. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. In Budapest Scientometrics (Vol. 52, Issue 2). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Huang, C. C., Chan, Y. K., & Hsieh, M. Y. (2022). The Determinants of ESG for Community LOHASism Sustainable Development Strategy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811429

Ismail, A. M., Adnan, Z. H. M., Fahmi, F. M., Darus, F., & Clark, C. (2019). Board capabilities and the mediating roles of absorptive capacity on environmental social and governance (ESG) practices. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(3), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v10n3p11

Jin, X., & Lei, X. (2023). A Study on the Mechanism of ESG’s Impact on Corporate Value under the Concept of Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 15(11), 8442. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118442

Jung, M., & Kim, Y.-L. (2022). The Interaction Effect of ESG and Innovation on Firm Value. Korean Journal of Financial Studies, 51(4), 471 – 498. https://doi.org/10.26845/KJFS.2022.08.51.4.471

Jung, Y. L., & Yoo, H. S. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance activities and firm performance: Global evidence and the moderating effect of market competition. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(6), 2830–2839. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2518

Khalil, M. A., Khalil, R., & Khalil, M. K. (2022). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) - augmented investments in innovation and firms’ value: a fixed-effects panel regression of Asian economies. China Finance Review International. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-05-2022-0067

Khalil, M. A., & Nimmanunta, K. (2021). Conventional versus green investments: advancing innovation for better financial and environmental prospects. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1952822

Kurznack, L., Schoenmaker, D., & Schramade, W. (2021). A model of long-term value creation. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1920231

Kuzma, E., Padilha, L. S., Sehnem, S., Julkovski, D. J., & Roman, D. J. (2020). The relationship between innovation and sustainability: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 120745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120745

Le Bas, C. (2017). Sustainable innovation and frugal innovation: Exploring the relationships between Innovation and sustainability. Revue d’économie Industrielle, 159, 113–137. https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.6617

Liu, H., & Zhang, Z. (2023). The impact of managerial myopia on environmental, social and governance (ESG) engagement: Evidence from Chinese firms. Energy Economics, 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106705

Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24529203

Maier, D., Maier, A., Așchilean, I., Anastasiu, L., & Gavriș, O. (2020). The Relationship between Innovation and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review of the Literature. Sustainability, 12(10), 4083. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104083

Majid, S., Zhang, X., Khaskheli, M. B., Hong, F., King, P. J. H., & Shamsi, I. H. (2023). Eco-Efficiency, Environmental and Sustainable Innovation in Recycling Energy and Their Effect on Business Performance: Evidence from European SMEs. Sustainability, 15(12), 9465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129465

Manninen, K., Laukkanen, M., & Huiskonen, J. (2024). Framework for sustainable value creation: a synthesis of fragmented sustainable business model literature. Management Research Review, 47(1), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2022-0177

Manocha, P., & Srai, J. S. (2020). Exploring environmental supply chain innovation in m&a. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(23), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310105

Moreno-Monsalve, N., Delgado-Ortiz, M., Rueda-Varón, M., & Fajardo-Moreno, W. S. (2022). Sustainable Development and Value Creation, an Approach from the Perspective of Project Management. Sustainability, 15(1), 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010472

Norris, S. (2023). A Matter of Framing: Analyzing Value Communication in Sustainable Business Models. Organization & Environment, 36(4), 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266231178795

Ozdemir, O., Binesh, F., & Erkmen, E. (2022). The effect of target’s CSR performance on M&A deal premiums: a case for service firms. Review of Managerial Science, 16(4), 1001–1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00471-y

Öztürk, O., Kocaman, R., & Kanbach, D. K. (2024). How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00738-0

Park, E., Kim, Y., Lee, A., Kim, J., & Kong, H. (2023). Study on the Global Sustainability of the Korean Construction Industry Based on the GRI Standards. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054231

Ping, W., Yue, M., Qi, Z., & Hao, S. (2023). ESG-Driven Corporate Value Creation under the Paradigm of Ecological Civilization: Evidence from the Shareholder, Industrial Chain and Consumer Channels. Social Sciences in China, 44(1), 129–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2023.2192090

Price, D. D. S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630270505

Sandberg, H., Alnoor, A., & Tiberius, V. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance ratings and financial performance: Evidence from the European food industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2471–2489. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3259

The Global Compact United Nations. (2004). Who Cares Wins: Connecting Financial Markets to a Changing World. In International Finance Corporation. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/280911488968799581/pdf/113237-WP-WhoCaresWins-2004.pdf

Treptow, I. C., Kneipp, J. M., Gomes, C. M., Kruglianskas, I., Favarin, R. R., & Fernandez-Jardón, C. M. (2022). Business Model Innovation for Sustainable Value Creation in Construction Companies. Sustainability, 14(16), 10101. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610101

Tsatsaronis, M., Syriopoulos, T., Gavalas, D., Boura, G., Trakadas, P., & Gkorila, M. (2022). 1 The impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on corporate financial performance: an empirical study on shipping. Maritime Policy & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2022.2116658

Zhang, F., Qin, X., & Liu, L. (2020). The Interaction Effect between ESG and Green Innovation and Its Impact on Firm Value from the Perspective of Information Disclosure. Sustainability, 12(5), 1866. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051866

Zhou, S., Rashid, Md. H. U., Mohd. Zobair, S. A., Sobhani, F. A., & Siddik, A. B. (2023). Does ESG Impact Firms’ Sustainability Performance? The Mediating Effect of Innovation Performance. Sustainability, 15(6), 5586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065586

Zioło, M., Bąk, I., & Spoz, A. (2023). Theoretical framework of sustainable value creation by companies. What do we know so far? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(5), 2344–2361. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2489

Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human eoclogy (Addison-Wesley Press., Ed.; 1st ed., Vol. 1). Addison-Wesley Press.

Downloads

Published

31.05.2024

How to Cite

Neves Gonçalves, M., & Cruz Basso, L. F. (2024). Bibliometric analysis into a decade of academic research on innovation, value creation, and sustainability (2013-2023). International Journal of Innovation, 12(2), e26353. https://doi.org/10.5585/2024.26353

Issue

v. 12 n. 2 (2024): Mayo/Aug.

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Autores

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal.

The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s).

The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s).

The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html

Authors  are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.