The role of climate change conspiracy in consumers’ pro-environmental behaviors

Jeff Thieme; Marla Royne Stafford; Joshua Coleman

doi:10.5585/remark.v23i3.25550

Autores/as

Jeff Thieme Michigan State University (MSU) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5883-6770
Marla Royne Stafford University of Georgia (UGA) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5978-9331
Joshua Coleman University of Memphis (UM) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7602-598X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v23i3.25550

Palabras clave:

English

Resumen

Objective of the study: This study seeks to investigate psychological processes driving consumers to engage in home energy efficiency investment behaviors and the potentially inhibiting role climate change conspiracy beliefs play in those processes.

Methodology/approach: Our conceptual model offers a set of hypotheses that we test through structural equation modeling.

Main results: Our model offers strong support for the values-beliefs-norms (VBN) model and the inhibiting role of climate change conspiracy beliefs in consumer energy investment behaviors.

Theoretical/methodological contributions: Our research utilizes value-belief-norm (VBN) theory to test our hypotheses. Additionally, we utilized conspiracy theory and specifically, conspiracy ideation, to demonstrate the role conspiracy beliefs play in decisions to engage in energy investment behaviors.

Relevance/originality: Conspiracy theory and climate change are two important topics affecting society. This is the first research that investigates both of these topics within the framework of VBN theory. Hence, our results have significant theoretical, management and social implications.

Management or social implications: Results suggest that those investigating decisions to adopt environmental products or engage in pro-environmental behaviors should consider the inhibiting role of conspiracies and using the VBN model as a key foundation. Moreover, these results indicate that how managers promote pro-environmental behaviors to customers and society must consider conspiracy ideation in developing their marketing strategies.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Jeff Thieme, Michigan State University (MSU)

Ph.D

Marla Royne Stafford, University of Georgia (UGA)

Ph.D

Joshua Coleman, University of Memphis (UM)

Ph.D.

Citas

Amburgey, J. W., & Thoman, D. B. (2012). Dimensionality of the New Ecological Paradigm:Issues of Factor Structure and Measurement. Environment and Behavior, 44(2), 235-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511402064

Attari, S. Z., DeKay, M. L., Davidson, C. I., & Bruine de Bruin, W. (2010). Public Perceptions of Energy Consumption and Savings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(37), 16054-16059. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001509107

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models [journal article]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02723327

Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item Versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs [Article]. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 44(2), 175-184. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30162466

Biddlestone, M., Azevedo, F., & van der Linden, S. (2022). Climate of conspiracy: A meta-analysis of the consequences of belief in conspiracy theories about climate change. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, 101390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101390

Boluda-Verdu, I., Senent-Valero, M., Casas-Escolano, M., Matijasevich, A., & Pastor-Valero, M. (2022). Fear for the future: Eco-anxiety and health implications, a systematic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84, 101904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101904

Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin.

Chan, H.-W., Tam, K.-P., & Hong, Y.-y. (2023). Does belief in climate change conspiracy theories predict everyday life pro-environmental behaviors? Testing the longitudinal relationship in China and the U.S. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 87, 101980. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101980

Claudy, M. C., Garcia, R., & O’Driscoll, A. (2015). Consumer Resistance to Innovation—A Behavioral Reasoning Perspective [journal article]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(4), 528-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0399-0

Claudy, M. C., Peterson, M., & O’Driscoll, A. (2013). Understanding the Attitude-Behavior Gap for Renewable Energy Systems Using Behavioral Reasoning Theory [Article]. Journal of Macromarketing, 33(4), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146713481605

Collins, C. M., & Chambers, S. M. (2005). Psychological and Situational Influences on Commuter-Transport-Mode Choice. Environment and Behavior, 37(5), 640-661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504265440

do Paço, A. M. F., & Reis, R. (2012). Factors Affecting Skepticism Toward Green Advertising [Article]. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367410410

Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2015). Challenging Climate Change: The Denial Countermovement. In R. E. Dunlap & R. J. Brulle (Eds.), Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives (pp. 300-332). Oxford University Press.

Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “New Environmental Paradigm”. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875

Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1984). Commitment to the Dominant Social Paradigm and Concern for Environmental Quality. Social Science Quarterly, 65(4), 1013-1028.

Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes: Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. Taylor and Francis Group, LLC. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838020

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.

Gansser, O. A., & Reich, C. S. (2023). Influence of the new ecological paradigm (NEP) and environmental concerns on pro-environmental behavioral intention based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 134629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134629

Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (2008). The Short List: The Most Effective Actions U.S. Households Can Take to Curb Climate Change. Environment Magazine, 50(5), 12-24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.50.5.12-25

George R. Milne, Shalini Bahl, & Rohm, A. (2008). Toward a Framework for Assessing Covert Marketing Practices. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 27(1), 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.27.1.57

Han, H., Olya, H. G. T., Kim, J., & Kim, W. (2018). Model of sustainable behavior: Assessing cognitive, emotional and normative influence in the cruise context. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 789-800. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2031

Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., & Fielding, K. S. (2018). Relationships among conspiratorial beliefs, conservatism and climate scepticism across nations. Nature Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0157-2

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. C. U. Press.

International Energy Agency. (2022). Buildings. https://www.iea.org/reports/buildings

Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M. (2008). The Organisation of Denial: Conservative Think Tanks and Environmental Scepticism. Environmental Politics, 17(3), 349-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802055576

Jansson, J. (2011). Consumer eco-innovation adoption: assessing attitudinal factors and perceived product characteristics. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(3), 192-210. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.690

Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014). The Social Consequences of Conspiracism: Exposure to Conspiracy Theories Decreases intentions to Engage in Politics and to Reduce one's Carbon Footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12018

Kennedy, M., & Basu, B. (2013). A Study on the Implementation of Renewable Heating Technologies in the Domestic Sector in Ireland with Implications on Consumers' Decision-Making [Article]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 44, 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.018

Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S., Kotcher, J., Carman, J., Neyens, L., . . . Goldberg, M. (2021). Climate Change in the American Mind, September 2021. Y. P. o. C. C. Communication.

Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106-131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018

Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013). The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science. PLOS ONE, 8(10), 1-11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075637

Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E. (2013). NASA Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457686

Liu, P., Teng, M., & Han, C. (2020). How does environmental knowledge translate into pro-environmental behaviors?: The mediating role of environmental attitudes and behavioral intentions. Science of the total environment, 728, 138126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138126

Marzouk, O. A., & Mahrous, A. A. (2020). Sustainable Consumption Behavior of Energy and Water-Efficient Products in a Resource-Constrained Environment. Journal of Global Marketing, 33(5), 335-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2019.1709005

Matthes, J., & Wonneberger, A. (2014). The Skeptical Green Consumer Revisited: Testing the Relationship Between Green Consumerism and Skepticism Toward Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.834804

McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2000). Challenging Global Warming as a Social Problem: An Analysis of the Conservative Movement's Counter-Claims. Social Problems, 47(4), 499-522. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097132

McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2010). Anti-Reflexivity: The American Conservative Movement's Success in Undermining Climate Science and Policy. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2-3), 100-133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409356001

Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & III, W. W. B. (1972). The Limits to Growth; A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. Universe Books.

Michaels, D. (2008). Doubt Is Their Product. Oxford University Press.

Onat, N. C., Egilmez, G., & Tatari, O. (2014). Towards greening the U.S. residential building stock: A system dynamics approach. Building and Environment, 78, 68-80. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.030

Oreg, S., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2006). Predicting Proenvironmental Behavior Cross-Nationally: Values, the Theory of Planned Behavior, and Value-Belief-Norm Theory. Environment and Behavior, 38(4), 462-483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505286012

Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of Doubt. Bloomsbury Press.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Prothero, A., Dobscha, S., Freund, J., Kilbourne, W. E., Luchs, M. G., Ozanne, L. K., & Thøgersen, J. (2011). Sustainable Consumption: Opportunities for Consumer Research and Public Policy [Article]. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.30.1.31

Rausch, T. M., & Kopplin, C. S. (2021). Bridge the gap: Consumers’ purchase intention and behavior regarding sustainable clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123882

Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bengtsson, M. (2018). Consumer motivations for sustainable consumption: The interaction of gain, normative and hedonic motivations on electric vehicle adoption. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1272-1283. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2074

Rossiter, J. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing [Article]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(4), 305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(02)00097-6

Rossiter, J. R. (2016). How to use C-OAR-SE to design optimal standard measures [Article]. European Journal of Marketing, 50(11), 1924-1941. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2016-0546

Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative Influences on Altruism1. In B. Leonard (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. Volume 10, pp. 221-279). Academic Press. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5

Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors Influencing the Acceptability of Energy Policies: A Test of VBN Theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 415-425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003

Stern, P. C. (2000). New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175

Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism. Research in Human Ecology, 6(2), 81-97.

Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 202-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x

Uscinski, J., Enders, A., Klofstad, C., Seelig, M., Drochon, H., Premaratne, K., & Murthi, M. (2022). Have beliefs in conspiracy theories increased over time? PLOS ONE, 17(7), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270429

Uscinski, J. E. (2019). Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them [Book]. Oxford University Press.

Van der Linden, S. (2015). The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance. Personality and Individual Differences, 87(December), 171-173. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045

Venugopal, A., & Shukla, D. (2019). Identifying consumers' engagement with renewable energy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2185

Whitmarsh, L., Player, L., Jiongco, A., James, M., Williams, M., Marks, E., & Kennedy-Williams, P. (2022). Climate anxiety: What predicts it and how is it related to climate action?. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 83, 101866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101866

Wyss, A. M., Knoch, D., & Berger, S. (2022). When and how pro-environmental attitudes turn into behavior: The role of costs, benefits, and self-control. Journal of environmental psychology, 79, 101748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101748