The right to live versus refuse to vital treatment

Authors

  • Zilda Mara Consalter Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
  • Pedro Jaremczuk UEPG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/prismaj.v9i1.2168

Keywords:

Direito à vida, Tratamento vital, Colisão de direitos fundamentais, Dignidade humana.

Abstract

It is analyzed through this study, the conflict that exists between the right to life with other right or fundamental principle: the right to refuse to vital treatment based on religious freedom, human dignity and autonomy of the will of the patient. Perform a study more specific about the refusal of vital treatment in confrontation with life, with the presentation of possible solutions to the problem. Refusal of medical treatment or surgical interventions, although much discussed in the doctrine, must be respected unless it conflicts with their lives, hermeneutically regarded as a greater good. In this context, there is also no scientific progress can be achieved with the destruction of life and human dignity Key words: Human dignity. Human rights collision. Right to live. Vital treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Zilda Mara Consalter, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa

Mestre em Direito Negocial pela UEL. Professora assistente do Departamento de Direito das Relações Sociais do Curso de Direito da Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa. Advogada.

Pedro Jaremczuk, UEPG

Graduado em Direito pela UEPG. Servidor Público.

Published

2010-08-27

How to Cite

CONSALTER, Zilda Mara; JAREMCZUK, Pedro. The right to live versus refuse to vital treatment. Prisma Juridico, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 35–53, 2010. DOI: 10.5585/prismaj.v9i1.2168. Disponível em: https://periodicos.uninove.br/prisma/article/view/2168. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.