It was not forgotten, the legislator is right! Procedural fine inapplicability in case of unjustified absence on mediation hearings

Authors

  • Renato Horta Rezende

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/prismaj.v16n1.7177

Keywords:

Mediation. Fine Non-Applicability. Dignity of Justice.

Abstract

The Civil Code Proceedings recognized the multiport system of conflict resolution, encouraging consensual disputes dictum and imposing mandatory, as a rule, conciliation or mediation hearings. The unjustified absence of either party to the conciliation hearing shall be deemed to be an offense against the dignity of justice, which shall be punished with a 2% fine on the economic advantage or case value, but in this article it is asked whether the unjustified absence of the mediation would lead to the same penalty. Two hypotheses were investigated, first one related to the legal impossibility of imposing a fine due to lack of legislative foreknowledge, and second, impossibility of the same sanction, due to nature, characteristics and objectives of the mediation. Using a hypothetical-deductive method, the hypotheses were developed through a bibliographical review and legislative analysis, having as theoretical framework the current Proceedings, culminating with confirmation of both hypotheses. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Renato Horta Rezende

Mestre em Direito pelo Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito da Universidade Fumec (2016); graduado em Direito pela Fundação Universidade de Itaúna (2004); Advogado inscrito na Seccional Minas Gerais (2005); Professor de Legislação Ambiental, Legislação Acidentária e Previdenciária, Organizações e Normas Técnicas, Direito Minerário, Direito do Trabalho, Legislação profissional e ética no CEB-CECON (2007-2011); Professor de Direito Civil no CFDs da APMMG (2014); árbitro inscrito no CONFEJAB (2015).

Published

2017-11-30

How to Cite

REZENDE, Renato Horta. It was not forgotten, the legislator is right! Procedural fine inapplicability in case of unjustified absence on mediation hearings. Prisma Juridico, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 1, p. 51–73, 2017. DOI: 10.5585/prismaj.v16n1.7177. Disponível em: https://periodicos.uninove.br/prisma/article/view/7177. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.