Dynamic capabilities and complementarity in complex IT projects in Brazil: Dataprev's experience

Valter Moreno, Rodrigo Ferreira, Fernando Filardi


Objective of the study: Large IT projects are admittedly complex, expensive, and risky, and not always produce the desired business results. In this study, we draw on the Resource-Based View and the theory of dynamic capabilities to elucidate the dynamics that allow a company to extract value continuously from an investment in a large corporate system.

Methodology / approach: To accomplish this, we developed a case study on the implementation and post-implementation of an ERP system by Dataprev, a large Brazilian public company.

Originality / Relevance: Our study provides empirical evidence of the interplay among complementary IT and organizational resources and capabilities, and dynamic capabilities in a large ERP implementation project and subsequent events in a Brazilian public company. There is still a paucity of research on these three issues, especially in the context of emerging economies.

Main results: Our analysis of the primary and secondary qualitative data we collected showed that, over time, the company's dynamic capabilities worked to improve the complementarity of IT and organizational resources and capabilities. This allowed Dataprev to develop new synergistic resources and capabilities and thereby, increase its performance and competitiveness continuously.

Theoretical / methodological contributions: We describe these resources and capabilities, as well as the dynamics of their interactions, and discuss its theoretical and practical implications.


Resource-Based View (RBV); Complementarity; Dynamic capabilities; Information technology investments; Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP).

Full Text:



ABES (2019). Brazilian Software Market: Scenario and Trends. Available at: http://central.abessoftware.com.br/Content/UploadedFiles/Arquivos/Dados%202011/ABES-EstudoMercadoBrasileirodeSoftware2019.pdf.

Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Ravindran, S. (2006). Value implications of investments in information technology. Management Science, 52(9), 1359–1376.

Arvidsson, V., Holmström, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2014). Information systems use as strategy practice: A multi-dimensional view of strategic information system implementation and use. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(1), 45–61.

Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Managers in Business Strategy and Economic Performance. Organization Science, 20, 410-421.

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the Resource-Based View. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643-650.

Chadwick, C., & Dabu, A. (2009). Human Resources, Human Resource Management, and the Competitive Advantage of Firms: Toward a More Comprehensive Model of Causal Linkages. Organization Science, 20(1), 253-272.

Chang, H.-H., & Chou, H.-W. (2011). Drivers and effects of enterprise resource planning post-implementation learning. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(2), 251–259.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1105-1121.

Friese, S. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis with ATLAS.ti (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Huesch, M. D. (2013). Are there always synergies between productive resources and resource deploymentimplementation capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, 34(11), 1288–1313.

Karimi, J., Somers, T. M., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2007). The Role of Information Systems Resources in ERP Capability Building and Business Process Outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(2), 221–260.

Kohlbacher, F. (2006). The Use of Qualitative Content Analysis in Case Study Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/75/153.

Kouki, R., Poulin, D., & Pellerin, R. (2010). The Impact of Contextual Factors on ERP Assimilation: Exploratory Findings from a Developed and a Developing Country. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 13(1), 28–55.

Kurtz, D. J., Santos, J. L., & Steil, A. V. (2013). Knowledge absorption capacity and

Dynamic Capabilities in the Context Turbulent environments: a literature review. IV meeting of information management.

Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., e Barney, J. B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19, 487-505.

Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385.

Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information Technology And Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model Of IT Business Value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283–322.

Nevo, S., & Wade, M. R. (2010). The Formation and Value of IT-enabled Resources: Antecedents and Consequences of Synergistic Relationships. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 163–183.

Pappa, D., & Stergioulas, L. K. (2008). The emerging role of corporate information systems: An example from the area of business process-oriented learning. Int. Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 3(2). Available at: http://www.business-and-management.org/paper.php?id=29.

Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239–273.

Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Portugal Vasconcelos Ferreira, M. A. S., Reis, N. R., Ribeiro Serra, F. A., & Kramer Costa, B. (2014). Understanding the Footprint of the RBV in International Business Studies: the Last Twenty Years of Research. Brazilian Business Review, 11(4), 53–83.

Schryen, G. (2013). Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there. European Journal of Information Systems, 22, 139–169.

Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership and administration. (Harper & Row, Ed.). New York.

Staehr, L. (2010). Understanding the role of managerial agency in achieving business benefits from ERP systems. Information Systems Journal, 20(3), 213–238.

Stanciu, V., & Tinca, A. (2013). ERP solutions between success and failure. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 12(4), 626.

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, And Suggestions For Future Research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107–142.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.

Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding Dynamic Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 991–995.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v19i3.14288


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management (IJSM)
Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia (RIAE)
e-ISSN: 2176-0756

Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management (IJSM) © 2021 All rights reserved.

Is this work licensed with a License
Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional