Development and motor control of individuals institutionalized in shelters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/conssaude.v18n2.11020Keywords:
Child development, Motor dexterity, Institutionalization, MovementAbstract
Introduction: Changes in motor control are the first that may appear, compromising individual development and the learning of motor skills. Objective: Verifying and comparing development and motor control of children and teenagers institutionalized in shelters with those who live in a family environment. Methods: It has been evaluated 54 children and teenagers divided into Shelter Group (SG) and Control Group (CG). The evaluation of psychomotor development has been done by Psychomotor Battery; motor control, by the computational task Fitts Reciprocal Aiming Task v.1.0 (Horizontal). Results: Lower SG scores have been found in motor development analysis; however, both groups have been presented “good” profiles. In addition, it has been found a considerable increase in the movement from ID2 to ID4a with maintenance from ID4a to ID4b, and from ID4b to ID6. Conclusion: SG individuals presented appropriate psychomotor development according to their age with deficit in the motor control and longer movement time in relation to the CG, showing bigger difficulty in the speed.
Downloads
References
Corval R, Belsky J, Baptista J, Oliveira P, Mesquita A, Soares I. Inhibited attachment disordered behavior in institutionalized preschool children: links with early and current relational experiences. Attach Hum Dev. 2017; 19(6):598-612.
Os abrigos para crianças e adolescentes e o direito à convivência familiar e comunitária [Internet]. 2005. Acessado em 2018 nov 30. Disponível em: http://ipea.gov.br/agencia/images/stories/PDFs/politicas_sociais/ENSAIO3_Enid11.pdf
Roeber BJ, Tober CL, Bolt DM, Pollak SD. Gross motor development in children adopted from orphanage settings. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012; 4(6):527-31.
Adolph KE, Franchak JM. The development of motor behavior. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2017; 8:1-2.
Defilipo EC, Frônio JS, Teixeira MT, Leite IC, Bastos RR, Vieira MT, Ribeiro LC. Opportunities in the home environment for motor development. Rev Saude Publica. 2012; 46(4):633-41.
Santos CMS, Rodrigues MM, Fernani DCGL, Freire APCF, Monteiro CBM, Prado MTA. Aprendizagem motora em crianças e adolescentes institucionalizados em abrigo. Fisioter Mov. 2017;30:725-32.
Neto FR, Amaro KS, Prestes DB, Arab C. O esquema corporal de crianças com dificuldade de aprendizagem. Psicol Esc Educ. 2011[citado 2018 nov 3]; 15(1):15-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-85572011000100002
Gallahue, DL. Educação Física desenvolvimentista. Cinergis, 1(1), 20007-17.
Vieira, L F, Santos, VC, Vieira, J LL, Oliveira, AAB. Análise da aprendizagem perceptivo-motora de crianças de 7 e 8 anos da rede de ensino público de Maringá – PR. Rev Educ Fis. 2004;15(2):39-48.
Page ZE, Barrington S, Edwards J, Barnett LM. Do active video games benefitthe motor skill development of non-typically developing children and adolescents. A systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(12):1087-100.
Davies TC, AlManji A, Stott NS. A cross-sectional study examining computer task completion by adolescents with cerebral palsy across the Manual Ability Classification System levels. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014; 56(12):1180-6.
Fernani DCGL, Prado MTA, Silva, TD, Massetti, T, Abreu LC, Magalhães FH, Dawes H, Monteiro CBM. Evaluation of speed-accuracy trade-off in a computer task in individuals with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional study. BMC Neurol. 2017; 27:17(1):143.
Ternes AM, Fielding J, Corben L.A, White OB, Bradshaw JL, Hocking DR, Karistianis GN. Movement planning and online control in multiple sclerosis: assessment using a Fitts law reciprocal aiming task. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2014;27(3):139-47.
Fonseca V. Manual de observação psicomotora: significação psicológica dos fatores. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1995.
Okazaki VHA. Discrete Aming TAsk (v.2.0). Software de análise da tarefa de Fitts para o paradigma da relação inversa velocidade precisão [Internet]. 2007. [acesso em 2018 nov. 30]. Disponível em: http://okazaki.webs.com
Ferreira TL, Martinez AB, Ciasca SM. Avaliação psicomotora de escolares do 1º ano do ensino fundamental. Rev Psicopedagogia. 2010;27(83): 223-35.
Levin AR, Zeanah CH Jr, Fox NA, Nelson CA. Motor outcomes in children exposed to early psychosocial deprivation. J Pediatr. 2014;164(1):123-129.
Chaves CMP, Lima FET, Mendonça LBA, Custódio IL, Matias EO. Avaliação do crescimento e desenvolvimento de crianças institucionalizadas. Rev Bras Enferm. 2013; 66(5):668-74.
Leite LC, Bonjovani LC, Marins MG, Marangoni VP. Avaliação da tonicidade no desenvolvimento psicomotor em escolares. Anais do 15º Congresso Nacional de Iniciação Científica – CONIC-SEMESP; 2015; 3; São Paulo, Brasil.
Pereira LA, Calsa GC. A Importância da psicomotricidade e do processo de tomada de consciência para prevenção de dificuldades de aprendizagem na educação infantil. Rev Eletrônica de psicologia e epistemologia genéticas. 2014;6(2):93-114.
Silva, DMM, Ribeiro DC, Rezende GP, Silva TD, Monteiro CBM, Trevizan IL, Wajnsztejn ABC, Massetti T. Speed-precision assessment in difficulty level function in Asperger’sdisorder. ABCS Health Sciences. 2016:41-1.
Miller HL, Caçola PM, Sherrod GM, Patterson RM, Bugnariu NL. Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder, Developmental Coordination
Disorder, and typical development differ in characteristics of dynamic
postural control: A preliminary study. Gait Posture. 2019 Jan; 67:9-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.08.038.
Sweeney KL, Ryan M, Schneider H, Ferenc L, Denckla MB, Mahone, EM.Developmental Trajectory of Motor Deficits in Preschool Children with ADHD. Dev Neuropsychol. 2018;43(5):419-429.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 ConScientiae Saúde
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
