Physical therapy for the premature newborn in neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review

Authors

  • Bruna Silva Oliveira
  • Karla Morganna Pereira Pinto de Mendonça Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN. Natal, RN
  • Diana Amélia de Freitas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/conssaude.v14n4.5254

Keywords:

Intensive care, Newborn, Prematurity, Risk factors, Physical therapy specialty.

Abstract

Introduction: Preterm infants are more vulnerable to adverse outcomes resulting from their own immaturity and hospitalization. Thus, it is important to investigate the clinical implications and benefits of physical therapy in this population. Objective: To develop a systematic review to investigate the clinical implications and potential benefits of physical therapy in premature newborns hospitalized in the intensive care unit. Methods: Lilacs, Pubmed and Scopus databases were consulted. Two independent reviewers performed the selection of eligible studies and risk of bias assessment. Results: Four studies were included in the review. Physical therapy was considered safe, and it was possible to observe reducing pain, improvement in sleep quality, weight gain and autonomic nervous system function. Conclusion: Physical Therapy may contribute to the development and comfort of premature newborns without harms. Nevertheless, this review was limited by the existing data and by the small number of studies assessed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Karla Morganna Pereira Pinto de Mendonça, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN. Natal, RN

Doutorado e Mestrado em Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde . Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, UFRN, Brasil.

Published

2016-04-27

How to Cite

1.
Oliveira BS, Mendonça KMPP de, Freitas DA de. Physical therapy for the premature newborn in neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review. Cons. Saúde [Internet]. 2016 Apr. 27 [cited 2024 Jul. 4];14(4):647-54. Available from: https://periodicos.uninove.br/saude/article/view/5254

Issue

Section

Literature reviews