Engajamento e desengajamento online: um estudo quantitativo com estudantes do ensino superior: un estudio cuantitativo con estudiantes de educación superior

Valesca Brasil Irala; Fernanda da Cunha  Ortega

doi:10.5585/eccos.n69.24623

Autores/as

Valesca Brasil Irala Universidade Federal do Pampa – Unipampa https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6190-8440
Fernanda da Cunha Ortega Universidade Federal do Pampa – Unipampa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3361-029X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/eccos.n69.24623

Palabras clave:

educación superior, acceso a la educación superior, investigación cuantitativa

Resumen

Esta investigación cuantitativa se centra en los conceptos de involucramiento y desinvolucramiento de los estudiantes en el modelo en línea, a partir de una estructura conceptual denominada “modelo doble”. El objetivo central de la investigación es comprender los procesos de involucramiento y desinvolucramiento en línea de los estudiantes de pregrado. Sin embargo, el aporte de la investigación no se restringe a esta modalidad, ya que el instrumento ya validado se puede aplicar y validar a otros escenarios. El cuestionario, que se aplicó a 1373 estudiantes de pregrado, consta de 50 ítems y cubre las siguientes dimensiones de involucramiento y desinvolucramiento: conductual, cognitivo, emocional, agentivo y social. La validación de contenido del instrumento se realizó con siete jueces expertos, además del análisis estadístico mediante análisis factorial confirmatorio y confiabilidad compuesta. Las dimensiones de involucramiento que se destacaron fueron la cognitiva y conductual, mientras que entre las puntuaciones de desinvolucramiento, la más destacada fue la emocional. En cuanto al cruce de algunas variables, se observó que los adultos mayores eran los más comprometidos y los jóvenes los más desenganchados. Por otro lado, no hubo diferencia en los niveles de involucramiento según el género. El estudio destaca la importancia de una mayor inversión en el desarrollo del involucramiento agentivo, ya que esto puede contribuir a potenciar un mayor protagonismo de los estudiantes.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Valesca Brasil Irala, Universidade Federal do Pampa – Unipampa

Docente do Mestrado Acadêmico em Ensino da UNIPAMPA (Universidade Federal do Pampa). Doutora em Letras e Pós-doutora em Ciencias de la Educación. Líder do Grupo de Pesquisa GAMA (Grupo sobre Aprendizagens, Metodologias e Avaliação).

Fernanda da Cunha Ortega , Universidade Federal do Pampa – Unipampa

Administradora na Universidade Federal do Pampa. Mestre em Ensino pela Universidade Federal do Pampa (UNIPAMPA).

Citas

BOND, Melissa; BEDENLIER, Svenja. Facilitating Student Engagement Through Educational Technology: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, v. 2019, n. 1, p. 11, set. 2019. Disponível em: https://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/jime.528. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2021.

BOND, Melissa et al. Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, v. 17, n. 1, p. 2–30, jan. 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8. Acesso em: 19 mai. 2024.

BORDBAR, Maryam. Autonomy-Supportive Faculty, Students' Self-System Processes, Positive Academic Emotions, and Agentic Engagement: Adding Emotions to Self-System Model of Motivational Development. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 12, p. 1-9, set. 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727794. Acesso em: 25 jan. 2022.

BORSA, Juliane; DAMÁSIO, Bruno; BANDEIRA, Denise. Adaptação e validação de instrumentos psicológicos entre culturas: algumas considerações. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), v. 22, n. 53, p. 423–432, dez. 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2012000300014. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2021.

BROWN, Timothy. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Publications, 2006.

CHEN, Pu-Shih; LAMBERT, Amber; GUIDRY, Kevin. Engaging online learners: The impact of web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, v. 54, p. 1222– 1232, maio. 2010. Disponível em: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008. Acesso em: 24 jan. 2022.

CHIPCHASE, Lucy et al. Conceptualising and Measuring Student Disengagement in Higher Education: A Synthesis of the Literature. International Journal of Higher Education, v. 6, n. 2, p. 31-42, mar. 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n2p31. Acesso em: 21 ago. 2021.

CHIU, Thomas. Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, v. 54., n.1, p.1– 17, fev. 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998. Acesso em: 08 fev. 2022.

COATES, Hamish. Student Engagement in Campus-Based and Online Education. New York: Routledge, 2006.

COATES, Hamish. A model of online and general campus‐based student engagement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 32, n. 2, p. 121–141, abr. 2007. Disponível em: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ766453. Acesso em: 06 ago. 2021.

COELHO, Jorge; SOUZA, Gustavo; ALBUQUERQUE, Josmário. Desenvolvimento de questionários e aplicação na pesquisa em Informática na Educação. In: JAQUES, Patrícia Augustin; SIQUEIRA; Sean; BITTENCOURT, Ig; PIMENTEL, Mariano (Org.). Metodologia de Pesquisa Científica em Informática na Educação: Abordagem Quantitativa. Porto Alegre: SBC, 2020. Disponível em: https://metodologia.ceie-br.org/livro-2/. Acesso em: 07 set. 2021.

COHEN, Rinat et al. Teachers’ Conditional Regard and Students’ Need Satisfaction and Agentic Engagement: A Multilevel Motivation Mediation Model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, v. 49, p. 790–803, abr. 2020. Disponível em: 10.1007/s10964-019-01114-y. Acesso em: 25 jan. 2022.

DENG, Ruiqi; BENCKENDORFF, Pierre; GANNAWAY, Deanne. Learner engagement in MOOCs: Scale development and validation. British Journal of Educational Technology, v. 0, n. 0, p. 1–18, maio. 2019. Disponível em: 10.1111/bjet.12810. Acesso em: 15 set. 2021.

DIXSON, Marcia. Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE). Online Learning Journal, v. 19, n. 4, set. 2015. Disponível em: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1079585. pdf. Acesso em: 18 set. 2021.

FREDRICKS, Jennifer; BLUMENFELD, Phyllis; PARIS, Alison. School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, v. 74, n. 1, p. 59–109, 2004. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059. Acesso em: 06 ago. 2021.

FULFORD, Amanda. Refusal and disowning knowledge: re-thinking disengagement in higher education. Ethics and Education, v. 12, n. 1, p. 105–115, jan. 2017. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17449642.2016.1271578. Acesso em: 17 ago. 2021.

HAIR, Joseph et al. Análise multivariada de dados. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2009.

HU, Min; LI, Hao. Student Engagement in Online Learning: A Review. In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY (ISET), 2017, Hong Kong. Anais…Hong Kong: IEEE, 2017. Disponível em: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8005384. Acesso em: 19 set. 2021.

JANG, Hyungshim; KIM, Eun Joo; REEVE, Johnmarshall. Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, v. 43, p. 27–38, jun. 2016. Disponível em: 10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2016.01.002. Acesso em: 01 jul. 2021.

JIANG, Anne; ZHANG, Lawrence. University Teachers' Teaching Style and Their Students' Agentic Engagement in EFL Learning in China: A Self-Determination Theory and Achievement Goal Theory Integrated Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 12, p.1–11, jun. 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704269. Acesso em: 25 jan. 2022.

KAMPFF, Adriana. Engagement estudantil e percursos formativos no ensino superior. In: ZABALA, Miguel; MENTGETS, Manuir; VITÓRIA, Maria Inês. (Org.). Engagement na educação superior: conceitos, significados e contribuições para a universidade contemporânea. Porto Alegre: ediPUCRS, 2018. p. 85–98. Disponível em: https://repositorio.pucrs.br/dspace/bitstream/10923/20918/2/Engagement_Estudantil_e_Percursos_Formativos_no_Ensino_Superior.pdf. Acesso em: 23 set. 2021.

KRAUSE, Kerri‐Lee; COATES, Hamish. Students’ engagement in first‐year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 33, n. 5, p. 493–505, set. 2008. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02602930701698892. Acesso em: 21 ago. 2021.

MARTINS, Letícia Martins De; RIBEIRO, José Luis Duarte. Proposta de um modelo de avaliação do nível de engajamento do estudante da modalidade a distância. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas), [s. l.], v. 24, n. 1, p. 8–25, 2019.

MEYER, Katrina A. Student Engagement in Online Learning: What Works and Why. ASHE Higher Education Report, [s. l.], v. 40, n. 6, p. 1–114, 2014.

NASIR, Mohd Azrin et al. Modifying the student course engagement questionnaire use with online courses. Journal of educators online, v. 17, n. 1, p. 1-11, jan. 2020. Disponível em: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1241583. Acesso em: 29 jul. 2021.

REDMOND, Petrea et al. An Online Engagement Framework for Higher Education. Online Learning Journal, v. 22, n. 1, p.183–204, mar. 2018. 10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175. Acesso em: 19 ago. 2021.

REEVE, Johnmarshall; TSENG, Ching-Mei. Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, v. 36, n. 4, p. 257-267, out. 2011. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002. Acesso em: 12 ago. 2021.

REEVE, Johnmarshall. How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 105, n.3, p. 579-595, mar. 2013. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690. Acesso em: 25 jan. 2022.

RIGO, Rosa Maria. Engagement acadêmico: contributos das tecnologias digitais para um processo [trans]formativo nas relações de engajamento na Educação Superior. 2020. 186 f. Tese (Doutorado em Educação) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2020. Disponível em: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9200. Acesso em: 31 jan. 2022.

SILVA, Juliana Ollé Mendes Da et al. Engajamento entre Estudantes do Ensino Superior nas Ciências da Saúde (Validação do Questionário Ultrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-S) com Estudantes do Ensino Superior nas Ciências da Saúde). Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, [s. l.], v. 42, n. 2, p. 15–25, 2018.

SINHA, Suparna et al. Collaborative group engagement in a computer-supported inquiry learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, v. 10, n. 3, p. 273–307, set. 2015. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11412-015-9218-y. Acesso em: 24 jan. 2022.

SKINNER, Ellen et al. Engagement and Disaffection in the Classroom: Part of a Larger Motivational Dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 110, n. 4, p. 765–781, abr. 2008. Disponível em: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-16034-004. Acesso em: 27 jan. 2022.

SKINNER, Ellen; KINDERMANN, Thomas; FURRER, Carrie. A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, v. 69, n.3, p. 493–525, jun. 2009. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0013164408323233. Acesso em: 25 jan. 2022.

STEENBERGHS, Nina et al. Peer Effects on Engagement and Disengagement: Differential Contributions From Friends, Popular Peers, and the Entire Class. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 12, p. 1–12, set. 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726815. Acesso em: 26 jan. 2022.

TAY, Lee; LEE, Shu-Shing; RAMACHANDRAN, Kalaivani. Implementation of Online Home-Based Learning and Students’ Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Singapore Mathematics Teachers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, v. 30, n. 3, p. 299–310, abr. 2021. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40299-021-00572-y.pdf. Acesso em: 28 jan. 2022.

TUOVINEN, Sanna; TANG, Xin; SALMELA-ARO, Katariina. Introversion and Social Engagement: Scale Validation, Their Interaction, and Positive Association With Self-Esteem. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 11, p. 1–11, nov. 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.590748. Acesso em: 27 jan. 2022.

TURK, Murat. Measuring online student engagement in highr education: scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. 2022. 185 f. Disssertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Faculdade de pós-Graduação, University of Oklahoma, Norman, 2022. Disponível em: https://shareok.org/handle/11244/335591. Acesso em: 18 out. 2022.

VALENTINI, Felipe; DAMÁSIO, Bruno. Variância Média Extraída e Confiabilidade Composta: Indicadores de Precisão. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, v. 32, n. 2, p. 1-7, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-3772e322225. Acesso em: 25 maio. 2022.