Patent documents as a source of information for scientific and technological studies in the field of applied social sciences




patents, systematic literature review, Applied Social Sciences


Purpose of the study: To analyze how Applied Social Sciences (ASS) field uses patent documents in articles, in addition to non-patent literature.

Methodology/approach: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was carried out, by selecting articles statistically analyzed regarding the year of publication, authors’ nationality and knowledge area. Articles from the ASS area which explore technical information of patent documents were qualitatively analyzed as for content and ways patent information was used.

Originality/Relevance: The use of technical information present in patent documents is unusual in articles, in which bibliographic references prevail as the main data source. Knowledge fields with interdisciplinary profile lack specific studies.

Main results: The results obtained point that the ASS area explores little technical patent information, with patentometric studies prevailing. Articles that explore technical information observe on average one patent document, with a matter description based on textual data obtained from the title or abstract.

Theoretical/methodological contributions: Systematization of SLR selected articles that allowed performing relevant quantitative analysis to understand how ASS researchers use information obtained from patent documents (metric analysis or exploration of technical information) for the construction of scientific knowledge.

Social Contributions/Management Contributions: Potential opportunity to offer actions and tools to help students and researchers towards exploring patent bases in order to select documents relevant to the research topic.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Kátia Cinara Tregnago Cunha, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rio Grande do Sul / Porto Alegre, RS

M.Sc. in Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer for Innovation

Giandra Volpato, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rio Grande do Sul / Porto Alegre, RS

Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering

Cristiane Drebes Pedron, Ph.D. in Management Nove de Julho University / São Paulo, SP and Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rio Grande do Sul / Porto Alegre, RS

Ph.D. in Management


Allison, F., Carter, M., & Gibbs, M. (2020). Word play: a history of voice interaction in digital games. Games and Culture, 15(2), 91-113.

Barbosa, D. B. (2011). Onde se apura a patenteabilidade. Academia.ência_da_patente

Bregonje, M. (2005). Patents: A unique source for scientific technical information in chemistry related industry? World Patent Information, 27(4), 309-315.

Brown, C. J., & Cheng, J. M. (2014). Electronic cigarettes: product characterization and design considerations. Tobacco control, 23, ii4-ii10 do tabaco-2013-051476

Chen, C., Zhang, K. Z., Gong, X., & Lee, M. (2019). Dual mechanisms of reinforcement reward and habit in driving smartphone addiction: the role of smartphone features. Internet Research, 29(6), 1551-1570.

Coelho, G. M., & Coelho, D. M. S. (2003). Prospecção tecnológica: metodologias e experiências nacionais e internacionais. Agência Reguladora do Petróleo, Gás e Biocombustíveis (Nota Técnica 12/2003).

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. (2022, 15 de junho). Tabela de Áreas do Conhecimento.


Deng, J., & Lee, J. Y. (2019). The Patent Map of a Measuring Cup. International Journal of Systematic Innovation, 5(3), 17-27.

Donald, K. E., Kabir, K. M., & Donald, W. A. (2018). Tips for reading patents: a concise introduction for scientists. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, 28(4), 277-280.

Escritório Europeu de Patentes. (2022, 20 de julho). Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS.

Hanelt, A., Firk, S., Hildebrandt, B., & Kolbe, L. M. (2021). Digital M&A, digital innovation, and firm performance: an empirical investigation. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(1), 3-26.

Hsiao, J. I. (2011). Nano Chinese Herbal Medicine Patenting in China: Industrial Applicability as the Benchmark in Assessing Patentability. Nanotech. L. & Bus., 8(2), 106-116

Hwang, J. Y., Yeom, D. J., Kim, J. S., & Kim, Y. S. (2021). Final detailed design of an all-in-one attachment-based PHC pile head cutting robot and its structural stability analysis. Journal of Asian

Architecture and Building Engineering, 20(5), 533-545.

Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial. (2020, 29 de julho). Patentes.

Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial. (2022, 3 de novembro). INPI divulga rankings dos maiores depositantes em 2020.

Kuzmichev, V., Moskvin, A., Moskvina, M., & Pryor, J. (2018). Research on 3D reconstruction of late Victorian riding skirts. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology.

Liu, S. H., Liao, H. L., Pi, S. M., & Hu, J. W. (2011). Development of a Patent Retrieval and Analysis Platform–A hybrid approach. Expert systems with applications, 38(6), 7864-7868.

Lopes, I. L. (2002). Estratégia de busca na recuperação da informação: revisão da literatura. Ciência da Informação, 31, 60-71.

Ma, J., & Porter, A. L. (2015). Analyzing patent topical information to identify technology pathways and potential opportunities. Scientometrics, 102(1), 811-827.

Mazieri, M. R., Quoniam, L., & Santos, A. M. (2016). Inovação a partir das informações de patentes: proposição de modelo Open Source de Extração de Informações de Patentes (Crawler). Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 16(1), 76-112.

Milković, M., Samardžija, J., & Ognjan, M. (2020). Application of blockchain technology in media ecology. Croatian Scientific Bibliography, 26(1), 29-52.

Oliveira, L. G. D., Suster, R., Pinto, A. C., Ribeiro, N. M., & Silva, R. B. D. (2005). Informação de patentes: ferramenta indispensável para a pesquisa e o desenvolvimento tecnológico. Química nova, 28, S36-40.

Organização Mundial da Propriedade Intelectual. (2013, June). Handbook on industrial property information and documentation.

Organização Mundial da Propriedade Intelectual. (2020). Global index of innovation 2020. Who Will Fund Innovation?

Organização Mundial da Propriedade Intelectual. (2021a). What is a patent?.

Organização Mundial da Propriedade Intelectual. (2021b). Índice Global da Inovação 2021 – resumo executivo.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

BMJ, 372(71), article PMC8005924.

Pimenta, F. P. (2017). Patents as an (un)necessary source of information for Biotechnology in Health. TransInformação, 29(3), 323-332.

PRISMA. (2021). Transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Quintella, C. M., Meira, M., Kamei, A. G., Tanajura, A. S., & da Silva, H. R. G. (2011). Prospecção tecnológica como uma ferramenta aplicada em ciência e tecnologia para se chegar à inovação. Revista Virtual de Química, 3(5), 406-415.

Quoniam, L., Kniess, C. T., & Mazieri, M. R. (2014). A patente como objeto de pesquisa em Ciências da Informação e Comunicação. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, 19(39), 243-268.

Reymond, D., & Quoniam, L. (2016). A new patent processing suite for academic and research purposes. World Patent Information, 47, 40-50.

Reymond, D., & Quoniam, L. (2018). Patent documents in STEM and PhD education: Open-source tools and some examples to open discussion. Anais da Conferência IEEE Global Engineering Education.

Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Espanha, 4-9.

Sánchez, G. (1999). Patentometria: herramienta para el analisis de oportunidades tecnológicas. [Tese de Doutorado, Universidade de Havana].

Singh, V., Chakraborty, K., & Vincent, L. (2016). Patent database: their importance in prior art documentation and patent search. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21(1), 42-56.

Symeonidou, M. M., Zioga, C., & Papadopoulos, A. M. (2021). Life cycle cost optimization analysis of battery storage system for residential photovoltaic panels. Journal of Cleaner Production, 309, article 127234.

Teixeira, L. P. (2013). Prospecção tecnológica: importância, métodos e experiências da Embrapa Cerrados. Embrapa Cerrados-Documentos (INFOTECA-E).

Tigre, P. B & Kupfer, D. (2004). Prospecção Tecnológica. Em: SENAI modelo de Prospecção: Documento Metodológico (pp. 1-19). CINTERFOR.,%20D.;%20TIGRE,%20P.%20B.%20Prospec%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20Tecnol%C3%B3gica.pdf

Tseng, Y. H., Lin, C. J., & Lin, Y. I. (2007). Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Information processing & management, 43(5), 1216-1247.

Usmanov, V., Illetško, J., & Šulc, R. (2021). Digital Plan of Brickwork Layout for Robotic Bricklaying Technology. Sustainability, 13(7), 3905.

Van Dongen, P., Hejazi, E., Noor, Z., & Claassen, E. (2017). Analysing Patent Terms and Citations to Determine the Value of Gene Therapies. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 23(2), 61-73.

Viswanathan, A. (2010). Wallace Carothers: More than the inventor of Nylon and Neoprene. World Patent Information, 32(4), 300-305.



How to Cite

Cunha, K. C. T., Volpato, G., & Pedron, C. D. (2023). Patent documents as a source of information for scientific and technological studies in the field of applied social sciences. International Journal of Innovation, 11(1), e22122.