De consumidor a prossumidor de energia: a adoção da geração distribuída a partir da teoria da prática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v22i3.20767Palavras-chave:
Consumo, Teoria da prática, Prossumidor de energia, Energia fotovoltaicaResumo
Objetivo: Compreender como o prossumo de energia fotovoltaica impacta as demais práticas dos consumidores.
Método: A pesquisa empírica foi conduzida por meio de entrevistas em profundidade com 24 consumidores. Os dados coletados foram analisados por meio da Análise de Conteúdo.
Originalidade/Relevância: O artigo traz para debate a articulação entre o prossumo de energia fotovoltaica e suas inserções nos complexos das práticas domésticas.
Resultados: Os achados da pesquisa sugerem que, a partir da introdução de uma nova prática, promovida pelo prossumo de energia fotovoltaica, os sistemas sociotécnicos se reconfiguram para acomodar esta prática recém incorporada.
Contribuições teóricas/metodológicas: O processo de adoção da prática do prossumo é uma trajetória que depende do engajamento em significados, entendimentos, procedimentos, que ocorre antes da incorporação dos materiais. A conexão entre os esses elementos forma a estrutura da prática do prossumo, que por sua vez, se integra com as demais práticas e reconfigura o sistema sociotécnico do qual ela passa a fazer parte.
Downloads
Referências
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de Conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70.
Beillan, V., & Goater, A. (2013). Understanding household decisions to become electricity producers and their role in the future energy landscape: case studies in France with photovoltaic electricity producers. ECEEE Summer Proceedings, 2211–2220.
Bergman, N., & Eyre, N. (2011). What role for microgeneration in a shift to a low carbon domestic energy sector in the UK? Energy Efficiency, 4, 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-011-9107-9
Bauer, M. W., Gaskell, G. (2002). Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som: um manual prático. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2002.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Investigação Qualitativa & Projeto de Pesquisa: escolhendo entre cinco abordagens. 3ª ed. Porto Alegre: Penso.
Faiers, A. & Neame, C. (2006). Consumer attitudes towards domestic solar power systems. Energy Policy, 34, 1797–1806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.038
Galvin, R., & Sunikka-Blank, M. (2016). Schatzkian practice theory and energy consumption research: Time for some philosophical spring cleaning? Energy Research & Social Science, 22, 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2016.08.021
Goulden, M., Bedwell, B., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Rodden T., & Spence, A. (2014). Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management. Energy Research & Social Science, 2, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.04.008
Gram-Hanssen, K. (2009). Standby consumption in households analyzed with a practice theory approach. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14 (1), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00194.x
Gram-Hanssen, K. (2010). Residential heat comfort practices: understanding users, Building Research and Information, 38 (2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210903541527
Gram-Hanssen, K. (2011). Understanding change and continuity in residential energy consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/0.1177/1469540510391725
Halkier, B., Katz-Gerro, T., & Martens, L. (2011). Applying practice theory to the study of consumption: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540510391765
Halkier, B., & Jensen, I. (2011). Methodological challenges in using practice theory in consumption research. Examples from a study on handling nutritional contestations of food consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540510391365
Hargreaves, T. (2011). Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540510390500
Hartmann, B. J. (2016). Peeking behind the mask of the prosumer: Theorizing the organization of consumptive and productive practice moments. Marketing Theory, 16(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593115581722
Lesdain, S. B. (2019). The photovoltaic installation process and the behavior of photovoltaic producers in insular contexts: the French island example (Corsica, Reunion Island, Guadeloupe). Energy Efficiency, 12, 711–722. Sem doi
Mayer, V. F.; Mariano, S. R. H.; Andrade, C. L.T. (2009). Percepção de Preço, Valor e Comportamento do Cliente no Setor de Energia Elétrica. Anais do XXXIII Encontro da ANPAD. São Paulo, 2009.
Oberst, C. A., Schmitzb, H., & Madlenerb R. (2019). Are Prosumer Households That Much Different? Evidence From Stated Residential Energy Consumption in Germany. Ecological Economics, 158, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.014
Ozaki, R., & Shaw, I. (2014). Entangled Practices: Governance, Sustainable Technologies, and Energy Consumption. Sociology, 48(3), 590–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513500101
Palm, J. (2018). Household installation of solar panels – Motives and barriers in a 10-year perspective. Energy Policy, 113, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.047
Palm, J., & Tengvard, M. (2011). Motives for and barriers to household adoption of small-scale production of electricity: examples from Sweden. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 7(1), 6-15. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15487733.2011.11908061
Parag, Y., & Sovacool, B. K. (2016). Electricity market design for the prosumer era. Nature Energy, 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.32
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/ 0.1177/1368431002005002005
Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson N. (2010). Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354673
Røpke, I. (2009). Theories of practice — New inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption. Ecological Economics, 68, 2490–2497. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.015
Schatzki, T. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schatzki, T. (2012). A Primer on Practices: Theory and Research. Practice-Based Education: Perspectives and Strategies, 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-128-3_2
Shove, E., & Pantzar, M. (2005). Consumers, producers and practices. Understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505049846
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012) .The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. London: SAGE.
Shove, E. (2011). How the social sciences can help climate change policy: an extraordinary lecture and accompanying exhibition of ideas. [YouTube]. Recuperado a partir de https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldEp3r1-8eo
Shove, E. (2018). Keynote Prof Dr Elizabeth Shove Breaking the Rules! Energy Transitions as Social Innovations. [YouTube]. Recuperado a partir de https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ic_ERoqaZ9g&t=19s
Sovacool, B. K., & Hess, D. J. (2017). Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change. Social Studies of Science, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717709363
Throndsen, W., Skjosvold, T. M., Ryghaug, M., & Christensen, T. H. (2017). From consumer to prosumer. Enrolling users into a Norwegian PV pilot. Summer Study proceedings, European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.
Toffler, A. (1980) The third wave. New York: William Morrow.
Truninger, M. (2011). Cooking with Bimby in a moment of recruitment: Exploring conventions and practice perspectives. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 11–37. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1469540510391221
Vasseur, V., & Kemp, R. (2015). A segmentation analysis: the case of photovoltaic in the Netherlands. Energy Efficiency, 8, 1105–1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9340-8
Vergara, S. C., & Caldas, M. P. (2005). Paradigma Interpretativista: a busca da superação do objetivismo. Revista de Adminsitração de Empresas, 45(4), 53-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902005000400006
Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505053090
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
