Patent documents as a source of information for scientific and technological studies in the field of applied social sciences
Abstract
Purpose of the study: To analyze how Applied Social Sciences (ASS) field uses patent documents in articles, in addition to non-patent literature.
Methodology/approach: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was carried out, by selecting articles statistically analyzed regarding the year of publication, authors’ nationality and knowledge area. Articles from the ASS area which explore technical information of patent documents were qualitatively analyzed as for content and ways patent information was used.
Originality/Relevance: The use of technical information present in patent documents is unusual in articles, in which bibliographic references prevail as the main data source. Knowledge fields with interdisciplinary profile lack specific studies.
Main results: The results obtained point that the ASS area explores little technical patent information, with patentometric studies prevailing. Articles that explore technical information observe on average one patent document, with a matter description based on textual data obtained from the title or abstract.
Theoretical/methodological contributions: Systematization of SLR selected articles that allowed performing relevant quantitative analysis to understand how ASS researchers use information obtained from patent documents (metric analysis or exploration of technical information) for the construction of scientific knowledge.
Social Contributions/Management Contributions: Potential opportunity to offer actions and tools to help students and researchers towards exploring patent bases in order to select documents relevant to the research topic.
Keywords
References
Allison, F., Carter, M., & Gibbs, M. (2020). Word play: a history of voice interaction in digital games. Games and Culture, 15(2), 91-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412017746305
Barbosa, D. B. (2011). Onde se apura a patenteabilidade. Academia.
https://www.academia.edu/4397074/Consistência_da_patente
Bregonje, M. (2005). Patents: A unique source for scientific technical information in chemistry related industry? World Patent Information, 27(4), 309-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2005.05.003
Brown, C. J., & Cheng, J. M. (2014). Electronic cigarettes: product characterization and design considerations. Tobacco control, 23, ii4-ii10
https://doi.org.br/10.1136/controle do tabaco-2013-051476
Chen, C., Zhang, K. Z., Gong, X., & Lee, M. (2019). Dual mechanisms of reinforcement reward and habit in driving smartphone addiction: the role of smartphone features. Internet Research, 29(6), 1551-1570. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-11-2018-0489
Coelho, G. M., & Coelho, D. M. S. (2003). Prospecção tecnológica: metodologias e experiências nacionais e internacionais. Agência Reguladora do Petróleo, Gás e Biocombustíveis (Nota Técnica 12/2003). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34008.21765
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. (2022, 15 de junho). Tabela de Áreas do Conhecimento. http://www.lattes.cnpq.br/documents/11871/24930/TabeladeAreasdo
Conhecimento.pdf/d192ff6b-3e0a-4074-a74d-c280521bd5f7
Deng, J., & Lee, J. Y. (2019). The Patent Map of a Measuring Cup. International Journal of Systematic Innovation, 5(3), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.6977/IJoSI.201903_5(3).0002
Donald, K. E., Kabir, K. M., & Donald, W. A. (2018). Tips for reading patents: a concise introduction for scientists. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, 28(4), 277-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543776.2018.1438409
Escritório Europeu de Patentes. (2022, 20 de julho). Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS. https://www.epo.org/searching-for-patents/technical/patent-additions.html
Hanelt, A., Firk, S., Hildebrandt, B., & Kolbe, L. M. (2021). Digital M&A, digital innovation, and firm performance: an empirical investigation. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(1), 3-26. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1747365
Hsiao, J. I. (2011). Nano Chinese Herbal Medicine Patenting in China: Industrial Applicability as the Benchmark in Assessing Patentability. Nanotech. L. & Bus., 8(2), 106-116
Hwang, J. Y., Yeom, D. J., Kim, J. S., & Kim, Y. S. (2021). Final detailed design of an all-in-one attachment-based PHC pile head cutting robot and its structural stability analysis. Journal of Asian
Architecture and Building Engineering, 20(5), 533-545.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1838912
Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial. (2020, 29 de julho). Patentes. https://www.gov.br/inpi/pt-br/servicos/perguntas-frequentes/patentes#patente
Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial. (2022, 3 de novembro). INPI divulga rankings dos maiores depositantes em 2020. https://www.gov.br/inpi/pt-br/central-de-conteudo/noticias/inpi-divulga-rankings-dos-maiores-depositantes-em-2020
Kuzmichev, V., Moskvin, A., Moskvina, M., & Pryor, J. (2018). Research on 3D reconstruction of late Victorian riding skirts. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCST-12-2017-0192
Liu, S. H., Liao, H. L., Pi, S. M., & Hu, J. W. (2011). Development of a Patent Retrieval and Analysis Platform–A hybrid approach. Expert systems with applications, 38(6), 7864-7868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.114
Lopes, I. L. (2002). Estratégia de busca na recuperação da informação: revisão da literatura. Ciência da Informação, 31, 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-9652002000200007
Ma, J., & Porter, A. L. (2015). Analyzing patent topical information to identify technology pathways and potential opportunities. Scientometrics, 102(1), 811-827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1392-6
Mazieri, M. R., Quoniam, L., & Santos, A. M. (2016). Inovação a partir das informações de patentes: proposição de modelo Open Source de Extração de Informações de Patentes (Crawler). Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 16(1), 76-112. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2016.v16i1.734
Milković, M., Samardžija, J., & Ognjan, M. (2020). Application of blockchain technology in media ecology. Croatian Scientific Bibliography, 26(1), 29-52. https://doi.org/10.22572/mi.26.1.2
Oliveira, L. G. D., Suster, R., Pinto, A. C., Ribeiro, N. M., & Silva, R. B. D. (2005). Informação de patentes: ferramenta indispensável para a pesquisa e o desenvolvimento tecnológico. Química nova, 28, S36-40. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422005000700007
Organização Mundial da Propriedade Intelectual. (2013, June). Handbook on industrial property information and documentation. https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/standards/en/pdf/03-09-01.pdf
Organização Mundial da Propriedade Intelectual. (2020). Global index of innovation 2020. Who Will Fund Innovation? https://tind.wipo.int/record/42278/files/wipo_pub_gii_2020_keyfindings.pdf
Organização Mundial da Propriedade Intelectual. (2021a). What is a patent?.
https://www.wipo.int/patents/en/faq_patents.html
Organização Mundial da Propriedade Intelectual. (2021b). Índice Global da Inovação 2021 – resumo executivo. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/pt/wipo_pub_gii_2021_exec.pdf
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
BMJ, 372(71), article PMC8005924. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pimenta, F. P. (2017). Patents as an (un)necessary source of information for Biotechnology in Health. TransInformação, 29(3), 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892017000300009
PRISMA. (2021). Transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
https://www.prisma-statement.org
Quintella, C. M., Meira, M., Kamei, A. G., Tanajura, A. S., & da Silva, H. R. G. (2011). Prospecção tecnológica como uma ferramenta aplicada em ciência e tecnologia para se chegar à inovação. Revista Virtual de Química, 3(5), 406-415. https://doi.org/10.5935/1984-6835.20110044
Quoniam, L., Kniess, C. T., & Mazieri, M. R. (2014). A patente como objeto de pesquisa em Ciências da Informação e Comunicação. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, 19(39), 243-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2014v19n39p243
Reymond, D., & Quoniam, L. (2016). A new patent processing suite for academic and research purposes. World Patent Information, 47, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2016.10.001
Reymond, D., & Quoniam, L. (2018). Patent documents in STEM and PhD education: Open-source tools and some examples to open discussion. Anais da Conferência IEEE Global Engineering Education.
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Espanha, 4-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363100
Sánchez, G. (1999). Patentometria: herramienta para el analisis de oportunidades tecnológicas. [Tese de Doutorado, Universidade de Havana].
Singh, V., Chakraborty, K., & Vincent, L. (2016). Patent database: their importance in prior art documentation and patent search. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21(1), 42-56.
Symeonidou, M. M., Zioga, C., & Papadopoulos, A. M. (2021). Life cycle cost optimization analysis of battery storage system for residential photovoltaic panels. Journal of Cleaner Production, 309, article 127234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127234
Teixeira, L. P. (2013). Prospecção tecnológica: importância, métodos e experiências da Embrapa Cerrados. Embrapa Cerrados-Documentos (INFOTECA-E). http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/981247
Tigre, P. B & Kupfer, D. (2004). Prospecção Tecnológica. Em: SENAI modelo de Prospecção: Documento Metodológico (pp. 1-19). CINTERFOR. https://www.ie.ufrj.br/images/IE/grupos/GIC/CORPO%20DOCENTE/DAVID%20SERGIO%20KUPFER/Cap%C3%ADtulo%20de%20Livros/2004/KUPFER,%20D.;%20TIGRE,%20P.%20B.%20Prospec%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20Tecnol%C3%B3gica.pdf
Tseng, Y. H., Lin, C. J., & Lin, Y. I. (2007). Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Information processing & management, 43(5), 1216-1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.11.011
Usmanov, V., Illetško, J., & Šulc, R. (2021). Digital Plan of Brickwork Layout for Robotic Bricklaying Technology. Sustainability, 13(7), 3905. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073905
Van Dongen, P., Hejazi, E., Noor, Z., & Claassen, E. (2017). Analysing Patent Terms and Citations to Determine the Value of Gene Therapies. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 23(2), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.5912/jcb777
Viswanathan, A. (2010). Wallace Carothers: More than the inventor of Nylon and Neoprene. World Patent Information, 32(4), 300-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2009.09.004https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2009.09.004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/2023.22122
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Dos autores
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
International Journal of Innovation
e-ISSN: 2318-9975
journaliji.org
Is this work licensed with a License
Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional