The effects of perceived risk on the intention to use autonomous vehicles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v22i4.23746Keywords:
Perceived risk, Intention to use, Autonomous vehicles, Psychological risk, Novelty, AnxietyAbstract
Objectives: This study sought to verify the effects of perceived risk on the intention to use autonomous vehicles (AV) and the possible influence of 'novelty' and 'anxiety'.
Methodology/approach: The research sample was composed of 340 Business Administration students from a Brazilian university and the research was developed as a quasi-experiment because the sample was not chosen randomly. The sample was divided into two groups: an experimental group with access to a video explaining the benefits of autonomous vehicles and another group without any information.
Results: For the experimental group, information is a mitigating factor for the perceived psychological risk, which influences the most their intention to use an AV. On the other hand, the novelty affects the consumer's intention to use AV; the same questionnaire was applied to both groups.
Theoretical/methodological contributions: The main contribution of this study is an innovative approach to consumer behavior, which proposes a theoretical model for analyzing the influence of 'novelty' and 'psychological risk,' such as 'anxiety', on the intention to use AV.
Relevance/originality: A proposal of a theoretical model for analyzing the influence of 'novelty' and 'psychological risk' such as 'anxiety' on the intention to use AV.
Implications for management: Helping marketers to direct their messages incorporating the theoretical model and consequently reducing consumer anxiety related to the use of autonomous cars.
Downloads
References
Aleem Raza, Muhammad Asif, & Mubasher Akram. (2023). Give your hunger a new option: Understanding consumers’ continuous intention to use online food delivery apps using trust transfer theory. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(2), 474–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12845
Alloulbi, A., Öz, T., & Alzubi, A. (2022). The Use of Artificial Intelligence for Smart Decision-Making in Smart Cities: A Moderated Mediated Model of Technology Anxiety and Internal Threats of IoT. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6707431
Ayyildiz, S., Çandereli̇, Z. Ö., Kiliç Aksu, P., Çatar, R. Ö., Ki̇tapçi, O. C., Şi̇şman Ki̇tapçi, N., Köksal, L., Demi̇rgöz Bal, M., & Mumcu, G. (2022). Assessment of Students’ Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training: Simülasyona Dayalı Doğum Eğitimi Uygulanmasında Öğrencilerin Kaygı Durumları ve Teknolojik Hazırbulunuşluklarının İncelenmesi. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing, 9(3), 264–273. https://doi.org/10.31125/hunhemsire.1229918
American Psychiatric Association, D., & American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (Vol. 5, No. 5). Washington, DC: American psychiatric association.
Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk-taking. In R. S. Hancock (Ed.), Dynamic marketing for a changing world. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 389-398.
Bhukya, R., & Singh, S. (2015). The effect of perceived risk dimensions on purchase intention: An empirical evidence from Indian private labels market. American Journal of Business, 30(4), 218-230.
Bido, D. D. S., & Da Silva, D. (2019). SmartPLS 3: especificação, estimação, avaliação e relato. Administração: Ensino E Pesquisa, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2019.v20n2.1545
Bido, D., da Silva, D., & Ringle, C. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling with the Smartpls. Brazilian Journal Of Marketing, 13(2).
Campbell, Stanley, J. C., & Gage, N. L. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Em N. L. Gage (Ed.) Handbook of research on teaching (p. 1-76). Chicago: Rand Mc-Nally.
Cai, J., Wu, J., Zhang, H., & Cai, Y. (2023). Research on the Influence Mechanism of Fashion Brands’ Crossover Alliance on Consumers’ Online Brand Engagement: The Mediating Effect of Hedonic Perception and Novelty Perception. Sustainability (2071-1050), 15(5), 3953. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053953
Celik, H. (2016). Customer online shopping anxiety within the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Technology (UTAUT) framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 28(2), 278-307. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2015-0077
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2003). Business Research Methods. 8th Edition, McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston.
Cox, D.F., & Rich, S.V. (1964), Perceived risk and consumer decision making – the case of telephone shopping Journal of Market Research, 1(4), 32-9.
Dabholkar, P. A. (1996). Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: An investigation of alternative models of service quality. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(1), 29–51.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-341.
Dijk, M., Wells, P., & Kemp, R. (2016). Will the momentum of the electric car last? Testing a hypothesis on disruptive innovation? Testing a hypothesis on disruptive innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 105, 77-88.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.013
Dimitriadis, S., & Kyrezis, N. (2010). Linking trust to use intention for technology‐enabled bank channels: The role of trusting intentions. Psychology & Marketing, 27(8), 799-820.
Dowling, G. R., & Staelin, R. (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of consumer research, 21(1), 119-134.
Dubey, S., Sharma, I., Mishra, S., Cats, O., & Bansal, P. (2022). A general framework to forecast the adoption of novel products: A case of autonomous vehicles. Transportation research part B: methodological, 165, 63-95.
Elhai, J. D., Levine, J. C. & Hall, B. J. (2017). Anxiety about electronic data hacking: Predictors and relations with digital privacy protection behaviour. Internet Research, 27(3), 631-649.
Ferràs-Hernández, X., Tarrats-Pons, E., & Arimany-Serrat, N. (2017). Disruption in the automotive industry: A Cambrian moment. Business Horizons, 60(6), 855–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.011.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research; 18(3):382-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial least squares: Regression and structural equation models. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates Publishers Asheboro.
Goedertier, F., Dawar, N., Geuens, M., & Weijters, B. (2015). Brand typicality and distant novel extension acceptance: How risk-reduction counters low category fit. Journal of Business Research, 68(1), 157–165 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.005
Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modelling. Sage Publications.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115-135.
Ho, J. S., Tan, B. C., Lau, T. C., & Oo, N. K. T. (2023). A Review of Perceived Risk Role in Autonomous Vehicles Acceptance. International Journal of Management, Finance and Accounting, 4(1), 22-36.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modelling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Jordan, G., Leskovar, R., & Marič, M. (2018). Impact of Fear of Identity Theft and Perceived Risk on Online Purchase Intention. Organizacija, 51(2), 146-155.
Kim, L.H., Qu, H. and Kim, D.J. (2009), "A study of perceived risk and risk reduction of purchasing air- tickets online", Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 203-224.
Kotzé, T. G., Anderson, O., & Summerfield, K. (2016). Technophobia: Gender differences in the adoption of high-technology consumer products. South African Journal of Business Management, 47(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v47i1.49.
Las-Casas, Alexandre Luzzi. (2012). Administração de marketing: conceitos, planejamento e aplicações à realidade brasileira. 1. ed. São Paulo: Atlas.
Likert, R. (1932). Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55. Google Scholar.
Madigan, R., Louw, T., Dziennus, M., Graindorge, T., Ortega, E., Graindorge, M., & Merat, N. (2016). Acceptance of Automated Road Transport Systems (ARTS): an adaptation of the UTAUT model. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2217-2226.
Mello, S. C. B. de, Bastos, A. F. de S., & Mello, G. B. de. (2020). [Im]Mobility and trucking disruption: what happened to isolated cities and individuals in Brazil after a supply blockage. Applied Mobilities, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2020.1809157.
Meyer-Waarden, L., & Cloarec, J. (2022). “Baby, you can drive my car”: Psychological antecedents that drive consumers’ adoption of AI-powered autonomous vehicles. Technovation, 109, 102348.
MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542-555.
Mitchell V. W. (1999). Consumer perceived risk: conceptualizations and models. European Journal of Marketing, 33 (1/2), 163–195.
Nunnally J. Psychometric theory (1978). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Park, J., Ahn, J., Thavisay, T., & Ren, T. (2019). Examining the role of anxiety and social influence in multi-benefits of mobile payment service. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 47, 140-149.
Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International journal of electronic commerce, 7(3), 101-134.
Pettersson, I., & Karlsson, I. C. M. (2015). Setting the stage for autonomous cars: a pilot study of future autonomous driving experiences. IET intelligent transport systems, 9(7), 694-701.
Quintal, V., Phau, I., Sims, D., & Cheah, I. (2016). Factors influencing Generation Y's purchase intentions of prototypical versus me-too brands. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 30, 175-183.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed., New York: Free Press.
Rundmo, T., & Nordfjærn, T. (2017). Does risk perception really exist? Safety Science, 93, 230-240.
Schaffer, R. H. (1971). The psychological barriers to management effectiveness. Business Horizons, 14(2), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(71)90003-6.
Silva, D., Cunha, L., Barros, C., & Baylina, P. (2019). Preparing the future scenario of automated vehicles: recommendations drawn from the analysis of the work activity of road transport workers. In Health and Social Care Systems of the Future: Demographic Changes, Digital Age and Human Factors: Proceedings of the Healthcare Ergonomics and Patient Safety, HEPS, 3-5 July 2019 Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 301-310). Springer International Publishing.
Stollery, A., & Jun, S. H. (2017). The antecedents of perceived value in the Airbnb context. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 391– 404. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjie-12-2017-040.
Subiyakto, A., Nurrachman, G. R., Nuryasin, N., Muslimin, J. m., Yuniarto, D., & Kartiwi, M. (2023). Network Externality Effects on Behavioral Intention to Use Consumer Internet of Things Among Urban Citizens in Indonesia. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 31(2), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2023-0024
Suryani, A., Rahayu, A., & Dirgantari, P. D. (2023). Measuring The Impact of Hedonic Motivation, Smart Shopper Perception, Location-Based Coupon Attitude on Intention of Use Location-Based Coupon. Dinasti International Journal of Management Science (DIJMS), 4(3), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms.v4i3
Theeke, M., Polidoro, F., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2018). Path-dependent Routines in the Evaluation of Novelty: The Effects of Innovators’ New Knowledge Use on Brokerage Firms’ Coverage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(4), 910–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217747269
Transportation Research Board (2015). Transport Research International Documentation - TRID." http://trid.trb.org/
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Waung, M., McAuslan, P., & Lakshmanan, S. (2021). Trust and intention to use autonomous vehicles: Manufacturer focus and passenger control. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 80, 328-340.
Wells, J. D., Campbell, D. E., Valacich, J. S., & Featherman, M. (2010). The effect of perceived novelty on the adoption of information technology innovations: a risk/reward perspective. Decision Sciences, 41(4), 813-843.
Wilson, M. L., Huggins-Manley, A. C., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Ruggles, K. (2023). Development of the Abbreviated Technology Anxiety Scale (ATAS). Behaviour research methods, 55(1), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01820-9
Wu, J. H., Wu, C. W., Lee, C. T., & Lee, H. J. (2015). Green purchase intentions: An exploratory study of the Taiwanese electric motorcycle market. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 829-833.
Zhang, S., Xia, Z., Zhang, C., Tian, X., & Xie, J. (2023). Green illusions in self-reporting? Reassessing the intention-behaviour gap in waste recycling behaviours. Waste Management, 166, 171-180.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.