Exploring the role of Malaysian research university-based incubators in facilitating the entrepreneurial process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v9i2.18578Keywords:
University-based incubators, Incubation process, Academic entrepreneurshipAbstract
Objective of the study: To clarify the role of university-based incubators in facilitating the entrepreneurial process by elucidating the value-add of the incubation activities through the lens of real options-driven theory and resource-based view theory.
Methodology/approach: An in-depth case study of five Malaysian research-led universities is conducted through thirteen semi-structured interviews with UBI managers and staff.
Originality/Relevance: Integrating real options-driven theory and resource-based view to understand the roles of UBI in supporting the entrepreneurial process, elaborated in the three stages of incubation: pre-main-post incubation phase.
Main results: UBI has a decisive role in facilitating entrepreneurial process through selecting potential entrepreneurs, mobilising the optimal mix of tangible and intangible resources, and monitoring the entrepreneurial process. All the five UBIs displayed interorganisational relationships with the various stakeholders and have capable incubator manager as a linchpin to facilitate the incubation process from pre to main incubation phase. However, there is little evidence on aftercare post incubation services to support the entrepreneurial growth stage, which are crucial for their continuing survival and growth.
Theoretical/methodological contributions: It adopts a multi-theoretical lens of real options-driven theory and resource-based view theory to explain the roles of UBIs in the entrepreneurial process.
Social/management contributions: It provides insights, best practices, and frameworks regarding the incubation process of Malaysian UBIs, and how its roles can be enhanced to drive more successful entrepreneurial processes.
Downloads
References
Abdul Khalid, F. A. (2012). An empirical analysis into the underlying components impacting upon business incubation process in Malaysia ICT incubators. [PhD dissertation, RMIT University]. RMIT University. Retrieved from https://researchrepository.rmit.edu.au/esploro/outputs/doctoral/An-empirical-analysis-into-the-underlying-components-impacting-upon-business-incubation-performance-of-Malaysian-ICT-incubators/9921861116701341
Abdul Khalid, F., Gilbert, D., & Huq, A. (2014). The way forward for business incubation process in ICT incubators in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Society, 15(3), 395-412. Retrieved from http://www.ijbs.unimas.my/repository/pdf/Vol15-no3-paper2.pdf
Abdul Khalid, F., Kayani, A. A., & Gilbert, D. (2018). The impact of monitoring and business assistance intensity on Malaysian ICT incubatees’ performance. Article presented at the MATEC Web of Conferences MUCET 2017, Malaysia. Retrieved from https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/the-impact-of-monitoring-and-business-assistance-intensity-on-mal
Abetti, P. A. (2004). Government-supported incubators in the Helsinki Region, Finland: Infrastructure, results, and best practices. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011179.47666.55
Abreu, F., Swirski, Y., & Gonçalo, C. (2006). Aprendizagem e criação do conhecimento em incubadoras. In Anais do XXX Encontro Nacional da Associação Nacional de Pós-graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (EnANPAD). Salvador: ANPAD.
Adkins, D. (1996). A decade of success: NBIA 10th anniversary survey of business incubators, 1985–1995. National Business Incubation Association, Athens: OH. Retrieved from National Business Incubation Association 10th anniversary survey of business incubators, 1985-1995: A decade of success: Adkins, Dinah: Amazon.com: Books
Aernoudt, R. (2004). Incubators: Tool for entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 23, 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000027665.54173.23
Aernoudt, R. (2005). Business angels: The smartest money for starters? Plea for a renewed policy focus on business angels. International Journal of Business, 10(3), 271-284. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228165930_Business_Angels_The_Smartest_Money_for_Starters_Plea_for_a_Renewed_Policy_Focus_on_Business_Angels
Akcomak, S. I. (2009). Incubators as tool for entrepreneurship promotion in developing countries. MERIT Working papers 2009-054. United Nations University-Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT). http://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/wppdf/2009/wp2009-054.pdf
Al-Mubaraki, H. M., & Busler, M. (2013). The effect of business incubation in developing countries, European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, 1(1), 19-25. Retrieved from https://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Effect-of-Business-Incubation-in-Developing-Countries.pdf
Al-Mubaraki, H. M., & Busler, M. (2015). The importance of business incubation in developing countries: Case study approach. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 10(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2015.070054
Amezcua, A., Grimes, M., Bradley, S. W., & Wiklund, J. (2013). Organizational sponsorship and founding environments: A contingency view on the survival of business incubated firms, 1994-2007. The Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1628-1654. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0652
Baron, R. A. (2004a). The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship’s basic “why” questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 221-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00008-9
Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation, 28(1-2), 20-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.008
Bizzotto, C. E. N. (2003). The incubation process. Brazil: Gene Institute – Fundação Universidade Regional de Blumenau Santa Catarina. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/123212360/The-Incubation-Process-September-2003
Campbell, C. (1989). Change agents in the new economy: Business incubators and economic development. Economic Development Review, 7(2), 56–59. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Change-Agents-in-the-new-economy%3A-Business-and-Campbell/d9af67433cbeabb624ee5a318ef47617f7ea067a
Christensen, C. & Overdorf, M. (2000). Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Business Review. http://innovbfa.viabloga.com/files/HBR___Christensen___meeting_the_challenge_of_disruptive_change___2009.pdf
Clough, D. R., Tommy, P. F., Vissa, B., & Wu, A. (2019). Turning lead into gold: How do entrepreneurs mobilize resources to exploit opportunities. The Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 240-271. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0132
Colbert, C., Adkins, D., Wolfe, C., & Lapan, K. (2010). Best practices in action: Guidelines for implementing first-class business incubation programs [Revised 2nd ed.]. Athens, OH: National Business Incubation Association.
De Paula, H.C., Starling, D.B., Nascimento, J.F. and Barbosa, F.V. (2015). Mensuração da inovação em empresas de base tecnologica, Review of Administration and Innovation - Rai, 12(4), 232-253. Retrieved from https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/102277
Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2004). Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 385-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00037-5
DeTienne, D. R. (2010). Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: Theoretical development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.05.004
Dudovskiy, J. (n.d.). Purposive sampling. Business Research Methodology. https://research-methodology.net/sampling-in-primary-data-collection/purposive-sampling
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2018). Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2018.pdf
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4
Ferguson, R., & Olofsson, C. (2004). Science parks and the development of NTBFs-location, survival and growth. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011178.44095.cd
Franco, M., Haase, H., & Correia, S. (2015). Exploring factors in the success of creative incubators: A cultural entrepreneurship perspective. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(1), 467-640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0338-4
Gay, B. & Dousset, B. (2005). Innovation and network structural dynamics: Study of the alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry. Research Policy, 34(10), 1457-1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.001
Gerlach, S., & Brem, A. (2015). What determines a successful business incubator? Introduction to an incubator guide. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 7(3), 286-307. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2015.071486
Gordon, I., Hamilton, E., and Jack, S. (2012). A study of a university-led entrepreneurship education programme for small business owner/managers. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(9-10), 767-805. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.566377
Gozali, L., Masrom, M., Zagloel, T. Y. M., & Norehan Haron, H. (2016). A framework of successful business incubators for Indonesian public universities, International Journal of Technology, 6, 1086-1096. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v7i6.3351
Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29, 75–91. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/30219811
Hackett, S. M. & Dilts, D. M. (2004a). A real options-driven theory of business incubation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011180.19370.36
Hassan, N. (2020). University business incubators as a tool for accelerating entrepreneurship: theoretical perspective. Review of Economics and Political Science, 2631-3561. https://doi.org/10.1108/REPS-10-2019-0142
Hisrich, R. D. & Peters, M. (2002). Entrepreneurship [5th edition]. McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. Retrieved from https://www.textbooks.com/Entrepreneurship-5th-Edition/9780072536201/Robert-D-Hisrich-and-Michael-P-Peters.php
Hisrich, R. D., Peters, M. P., & Shepherd, D. A. (2005). Entrepreneurship [6th edition]. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Retrieved from https://www.textbooks.com/Entrepreneurship-6th-Edition/9780072971859/Robert-D-Hisrich-Michael-P-Peters-and-Dean-A-Shepherd.php?CSID=2QZADOSDBMZOTC2TKKO2KMSCB&CSID=2QZADO2AQQKZDUMMTO2UAMSOB
Ismail, N. & Sidek, S. (2019). Determinant factors for commercialising research products in Malaysian public universities. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 8(6S4), 780-787. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.F1157.0486S419
Johnstone, A., & Huggins, R. (2016). Drivers of university–industry links: The case of knowledge-intensive business service firms in rural locations. Regional Studies, 50(8), 1330–1345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1009028
Ketchen, D. J. J., Thomas, J. B., & Snow, C. C. (1993). Organizational configurations and performance: a comparison of theoretical approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1278–1313. https://doi.org/10.5465/256812
Kodithuwakku, S. S. & Rosa, P. (2002). The entrepreneurial process and economic success in a constrained environment. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5), 431-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00074-X
Lalkaka, R. (2002). Technology business incubators to help build an innovation-based economy. Journal of Change Management, 3(2), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/714042533
Larty, J., Jack, S., & Lockett, N. (2016). Building regions: A resource-based view of a policy-led knowledge exchange network. Regional Studies, 51(7), 994–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1143093
Lasrado, V., Sivo, S., Ford, C., O’Neal, T., & Garibay, I. (2016). Do graduated university incubator firms benefit from their relationship with university incubators? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 205-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9412-0
Lee, S. S., & Osteryoung, J. S. (2004). A comparison of critical success factors for effective operations of university business incubators in the United States and Korea. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(4), 418-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2004.00120.x
Lewis, D. A., Harper-Anderson, E., & Molnar, L. A. (2011). Incubating success: Incubation best practices that lead to successful new ventures. University of Michigan. http://edaincubatortool.org/pdf/Master%20Report_FINALDownloadPDF.pdf
Linder, S. (2003). State of the business incubation industry. NBIA Publications.
Mahmood, N., Jamil, F., & Yasir, N. (2017). Role of business incubators in entrepreneurship development in Pakistan. City University Research Journal, Special Issue: AIC, 37-44. Retrieved from http://www.cusit.edu.pk/curj/Journals/Journal/special_aic_16/5.pdf
Mahmood, N., Jianfeng, C., Munir, H., & Yasir, N. (2016). Impact of factors that inhibit the drive of entrepreneurship in Pakistan: Empirical evidence from young entrepreneurs and students. International Journal of u- and e- Service, Science and Technology, 9(12), 163-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijunesst.2016.9.12.15
Miller, K., Alexander, A., Cunningham, J., & Albats, E. (2018). Entrepreneurial academics and academic entrepreneurs: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Technology Management, 77 (1/2/3), 9-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2018.091710
Moreira, A. C., & Carvalho, M. F. S. (2012). Incubation of new ideas: Extending incubation models to less-favored regions. Entrepreneurship-Creativity and Innovative Business Models. 41-58. https://doi.org/10.5772/36705
Oliveira, S. R. M. & Vieira, M. T. (2016). Empirical evidence about the characteristics and business incubators performance: A framework of multiple cases. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 6(1), 62-70. Retrieved from http://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_6_No_1_February_2016/6.pdf
O'Neal, T. (2005). Evolving a successful university-based incubator: Lessons learned from the UCF Technology Incubator. Engineering Management Journal, 17(3), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2005.11415293
Patton, D., Warren, L., & Bream, D. (2009). Elements that underpin high-tech business incubation processes. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(6), 621-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9105-7
Pena, I. (2004). Business incubation centers and new firm growth in the Basque country. Small Business Economics, 22(3-4), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000022221.03667.82
Perkmann, M., Tartarik, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
Peters, L., Rice, M., & Sundararajan, M. (2004). The role of incubators in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011182.82350.df
Posza, A. (2019). Business incubation analysis with the help of real options theory. International Journal of Multidisciplinary in Business and Science, 5(8), 64-72. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/228427
Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089
Rahman, M. S. (2017). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “testing and assessment” research: A literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102
Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Akid, M., Warraich, A. M., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424
Ratinho, T. (2011). Are they helping? An examination of business incubators’ impact on tenant firms. [PhD dissertation, University of Twente, Portugal]. BMS Faculty: Dissertations Overview. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036532631
Redondo, M. & Camarero, C. (2017). Dominant logics and the manager's role in university business incubators. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(2), 282-294. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2016-0018
Schütte, M. C. (2019). Are dynamic capabilities relevant for incubation performance?. [Master’s thesis, Lund University]. Lund University Libraries. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35139.76327
Schwartz, M. (2009). Beyond incubation: an analysis of firm survival and exit dynamics in the post-graduation period. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(4), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-008-9095-x
Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.2307/259271
Silva, F. M. G., & Andrade Júnior, P. P. (2012). Incubadoras de empresas e o desenvolvimento econômico e tecnológico. Revista de Engenharia e Tecnologia, 4(3), 44-58. Retrieved from https://riuni.unisul.br
Smilor, R. W. (1987). Managing the incubator system: Critical success factors to accelerate new company development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34(4),146–156. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1987.6498875
Soetanto, D. P. (2004). Research of the role of the incubation policy in helping the growth of new technology based firms. Lisbon: Globelics Academy.
Sousa, J., Meneses, R., Ribeiro, H., & Alves, S. R. (2018). The symbiotic relationship between startups and incubators. Article presented at the 36th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development – “Building Resilient Society” 2018, Zagreb, Croatia. Retrieved from https://www.esd-conference.com/upload/book_of_proceedings/Book_of_Proceedings_esdZagreb2018_Online.pdf
Stinchcombe, A. L. (2000). Social structure and organizations. Advances in Strategic Management, 17, 229-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17019-6
Stuart, T.E., & Sorenson, O. (2003b). Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 175-201. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556656
Sukhur, S. S., & Abu Bakar, S. (2018). Factors contributing to the incubation performance of Malaysian technology incubators. Economic and Technology Management Review, 13, 33-43. Retrieved from http://etmr.mardi.gov.my/Content/ETMR%20Vol.13(2018)/Vol13_3.pdf
Schwartz, M. (2009). Beyond incubation: an analysis of firm survival and exit dynamics in the post-graduation period. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(4), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-008-9095-x
Schwartz, M. (2013). A control group study of incubators’ impact to promote firm survival. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 302-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9254-y
Theodorakopoulos, N., Kakabadse, N., & McGowan, C. (2014). What matters in business incubation? A literature review and a suggestion for situated theorising. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-09-2014-0152
Tsai, K. H. (2009). Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy, 38(5), 765-778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.012
Van Burg, E. (2014). Commercializing science by means of university spin-offs: An ethical review. 346-369. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781007020.00023
Verma, S. (2004). Success factors for business incubators: An empirical study of Canadian business incubators. [Master dissertation, Eric Sprott School of Business Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario]. Carleton University Research Virtual Environment. Retrieved from https://curve.carleton.ca/system/files/etd/3e53ae0a-1536-47fe-bf15-61801227cbdf/etd_pdf/2897244706bf6a1a977d8a1b8c927d7a/verma-successfactorsforbusinessincubatorsanempirical.pdf
Walker, B. (2004). Selecting great clients: A Comprehensive Guide to Business Incubation [Completely Revised 2nd ed.]. National Business Incubation Association. Retrieved from https://inbia.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Selecting-Great-Clients.pdf?x62369
Wiggins, J., & Gibson, D. (2003). Overview of US incubators and the case of the Austin technology incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 3(1), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2003.002218
Wright, M., Piva, E., Mosey, S., & Lockett, A. (2009). Academic entrepreneurship and business schools. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(6), 560-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9128-0
Wulung, R., Takahashi, K., & Morikawa, K. (2014). An interactive multi-objective incubate selection model incorporating incubator manager orientation. Operational Research International Journal, 14, 409-438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-014-0148-7
Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20, 134–152. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102
Zaidan, O. F. (2014). R&D universiti gagal tarik minat industri. Berita Harian. http://umkeprints.umk.edu.my/3239
Zikmund, W. G, (1997). Business Research Methods [5th edition]. Fort Worth, Texas: Dryden. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0030184320
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Innovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal.
The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s).
The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s).
The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
