Improving the firm innovation capacity through the adoption of standardized innovation management systems: a comparative analysis of the ISO 56002:2019 with the literature on firm innovation capacity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v9i2.19273

Keywords:

Dynamic capabilities, Firm innovation capacity, Innovation management, Continuous improvement, Standardization.

Abstract

Objective of the study: Investigate how firm innovation capacity can be improved by adopting ISO 56002: 2019.

Methodology/approach: The methodology adopted is a comparative analysis of the ISO 56002: 2019 with the literature on firm innovation capacity. The methods employed in the study included a review of the literature on the dynamic capabilities and firm innovation capacity, and qualitative documentary research that consisted of three phases: pre-analysis, organization of documents, and the analysis of results, using information from the texts of the guidelines and processes indicated by ISO 56002: 2019, which additionally involved the ISO 56000 family of standards.

Originality/Relevance: The adoption of innovation management standards generates several theoretical challenges when exploring details of their implementation systematically and routinely and empirical challenges such as understanding the advent of ISO 56002: 2019 for innovation management.

Main results: Similarities were found between the determinants of innovation capacity and the ISO 56002: 2019 Clauses, as each of the seven factors found a relationship with one or more ISO 56002: 2019 clauses.

Theoretical/methodological contributions: The findings obtained can be used by researchers interested in studying different innovation management models, innovation capacity, and, particularly, the dynamics of continuous improvement of the performance of an innovation management system and its interrelationship and interaction with other factors.

Social/management contributions: Contrary to common sense in which the normalization of innovation management seems to be counter-intuitive, it is suggested that the adoption of ISO 56002: 2019 allows the innovation process to be managed, systematized, and replicated improving firm innovation capacity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Silvio Bitencourt da Silva, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos - UNISINOS

Doutorado em Administração de Empresas pela Universidade do Vale do Rio do Sinos - UNISINOS. Atualmente exerce a função de professor do Mestrado Profissional em Direito da Empresa e dos Negócios e dos MBAs em Gestão nos campos da inovação e estratégia; e a função de Gerente de Pesquisa, Desenvolvimento e Inovação na Unidade Acadêmica de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação da UNISINOS. Tem experiência em gestão de instituições de educação profissional e tecnologia; implantação e avaliação de sistemas e modelos de gestão como p. ex. o Modelo de Excelência da Gestão - MEG da Fundação Nacional da Qualidade - FNQ; implantação de processos de planejamento estratégico em empresas, instituições de ensino técnico e superior e entidades representativas com sindicatos patronais e associações; e gestão de parcerias de PD&I. Sua pesquisa orbita nos temas sobre estratégias interorganizacionais e gestão da inovação (tecnológica e social), com ênfase na adoção de estratégias de inovação aberta pelas empresas, e políticas públicas para inovação tecnológica.

References

AENOR (2006). UNE 166002 Gestión de la I+D+i: Requirements of an R&D&I Management System, AENOR.

Albors-Garrigos, J., Igartua, J. I., & Peiro, A. (2018). Innovation Management Techniques And Tools: Its Impact On Firm Innovation Performance. International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), 22(06), 1-31.

Alves, A. C., Barbieux, D., Reichert, F. M., Tello-Gamarra, J., & Zawislak, P. A. (2017). Innovation and dynamic capabilities of the firm: Defining an assessment model. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(3), 232-244.

Andrews, K. (1971), The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Irwin: Homewood.

Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo 4ªed. Lisboa: Edições, 70, 1977.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.

Barney, J. B. (2001a). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of management, 27(6), 643-650.

Barney, J. B., & Arikan, A. M. (2001). The resource-based view: Origins and implications. The Blackwell handbook of strategic management, 124-188.

Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of management, 27(6), 625-641.

Benraouane, S. A., & Harrington, H. J. (2021). Using the ISO 56002 Innovation Management System: A Practical Guide for Implementation and Building a Culture of Innovation. CRC Press.

Birchall, D., & Tovstiga, G. (2005). Capabilities for strategic advantage: Leading through technological innovation. Springer.

Bitencourt, C. C., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., Santos, A. C., & Teixeira, E. K. (2020). The extended dynamic capabilities model: A meta-analysis. European Management Journal, 38(1), 108-120.

Breznik, L., & Hisrich, R. D. (2014). Dynamic capabilities vs. innovation capability: are they related?. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(3), 368.

BSI (2008). Design management systems – part 1: guide to managing innovation. British Standard BS 7000–1:2008, BSI.

Caetano, I. (2017). Standardization and innovation management. Journal of Innovation Management, 5(2), 8–14.

Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative science quarterly, 50(2), 167-199.

Celukanovs, A., Wattle BJörk, S. (2019). Best Practices for Innovation Management.: A Study on Large Companies in Sweden.

CEN (2013). Innovation management – part 1: innovation management system. CEN/TS 16555–1.

Chiesa, V., Coughlan, P., & Voss, C. A. (1996). Development of a technical innovation audit. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(2), 105–136.

Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of management studies, 47(6), 1154-1191.

de Oliveira Garcia, M., Rodrigues, P. E. L., Emmendoerfer, M. L., Gava, R., & Silveira, S. D. F. R. (2016). Usos da pesquisa documental em estudos sobre Administração Pública no Brasil. Teoria e Prática em Administração (TPA), 6(1), 41-68.

Djoumessi, A., Chen, S. L., & Cahoon, S. (2019). Deconstructing Lawson And Samson’S Concept Of Innovation Capability: A Critical Assessment And A Refinement. International journal of innovation management, 23(06), 1950053.

Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 23(4), 660-679.

Egyedi, T. M., & Ortt, J. R. (2017). Towards a functional classification of standards for innovation research. In Handbook of innovation and standards. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Garechana, G., Río-Belver, R., Bildosola, I., & Salvador, M. R. (2017). Effects of innovation management system standardization on firms: evidence from text mining annual reports. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1987-1999.

Gloet, M., & Samson, D. (2020). Knowledge management and systematic innovation capability. In Disruptive Technology: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1198-1218). IGI Global.

Haldma, T., Näsi, S., Grossi, G., Saunila, M., & Ukko, J. (2012). A conceptual framework for the measurement of innovation capability and its effects. Baltic Journal of Management, 7(4), 355-375

Harrington, H. J. (2019). The Innovation Systems Cycle: Simplifying and Incorporating the Guidelines of the ISO 56002 Standard and Best Practices. Productivity Press.

Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. John Wiley & Sons.

Hoffmann, V. E., & Farias, J. S. (2018). Saturação teórica em pesquisas qualitativas: relato de uma experiência de aplicação em estudo na área de administração. Revista de Ciências da Administração, 20(52), 40-53.

Hollins, B. (2000). The development of a British standard for innovation management. The Design Journal, 3(2), 27–35.

Hyland, J., & Karlsson, M. (2021). Towards a management system standard for innovation. Journal of Innovation Management, 9(1), XI-XIX.

International Organization for Standardization - ISO (2013). ISO/TC 279 — Innovation Management. Available in: https://www.iso.org/committee/4587737.html . Accessed on: February 22, 2020.

International Organization for Standardization – ISO (2015). Quality management systems – requirements. International Standard, ISO 9001:2015.

International Organization for Standardization - ISO (2019). ISO 56002 — Innovation management — Innovation management system — Guidance. Available in: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:56002:ed-1:v1:en. Accessed on: February 22, 2020.

International Organization for Standardization - ISO (2020). ISO 56000:2020 — Innovation management — Fundamentals and vocabulary. Available in: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:56000:ed-1:v1:en. Accessed on: February 22, 2020.

International Organization for Standardization – ISO (2020a). ISO/TC 279 - Innovation management. Available in: https://committee.iso.org/home/tc279. Accessed on: February 22, 2020.

International Organization for Standardization – ISO (2020b).

ISO 56000 — Innovation management — Fundamentals and vocabulary. Available in: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:56000:ed-1:v1:en. Accessed on: February 22, 2020.

Karlsson, M., & Magnusson, M. (2019). The systems approach to innovation management. In J. Chen, A. Brem, V. Eric, & P. K. Wong. The Routledge Companion to Innovation Management. London: Routledge.

Kline, S. J. (1985). Innovation is not a linear process. Research Management, 28(4), 36–45.

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.

Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach. International journal of innovation management, 5(03), 377-400.

Martínez-Costa, M., Jimenez-Jimenez, D., & del Pilar Castro-del-Rosario, Y. (2019). The performance implications of the UNE 166.000 standardised innovation management system. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 281-301.

Mavroeidis, V., & Tarnawska, K. (2017). Toward a new innovation management standard. Incorporation of the knowledge triangle concept and quadruple innovation helix model into innovation management standard. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(2), 653-671.

Mendoza-Silva, A. (2021). Innovation capability: A sociometric approach. Social Networks, 64, 72-82.

Merrill, P. (2019). Deep Dive. Quality Progress, 52(5), 56-58.

Mir, M., & Casadesús, M. (2011). Standardised innovation management systems: A case study of the Spanish Standard UNE 166002: 2006. Innovar, 21(40), 171-188.

Mir, M., Casadesús, M. and Petnji, L. H. (2016). The impact of standardized innovation management systems on innovation capability and business performance: an empirical study. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 41, 26–44.

Naden, C. (2019a). Shape a new future with innovation management standards. Available in: https://www.iso.org/news/ref2414.html. Accessed on: February 22, 2020.

Naden, C. (2019b). Breaking new ground with better innovation management. Available in: https://www.iso.org/news/ref2368.html. Accessed on: February 22, 2020.

Naden, C. (2020). Shape a new future with innovation management standards. Available in: https://www.iso.org/news/ref2481.html. Accessed on: February 22, 2020.

Nason, R. S., & Wiklund, J. (2018). An assessment of resource-based theorizing on firm growth and suggestions for the future. Journal of Management, 44(1), 32-60.

Oslo, M. (2005). Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Report. Third edition. Oslo: OECD.

Peng, D. X., Schroeder, R. G., & Shah, R. (2008). Linking routines to operations capabilities: A new perspective. Journal of operations management, 26(6), 730-748.

Penrose, E.T. (1959), The Theory of Growth of the Firm, Blackwell, Oxford.

Pisano, G. P. (2017). Toward a prescriptive theory of dynamic capabilities: connecting strategic choice, learning, and competition. Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(5), 747-762.

Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of management review, 26(1), 22-40.

Rajapathirana, R. J., & Hui, Y. (2018). Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1), 44-55.

Rebelo, M. F., Santos, G. and Silva, R. (2015). Integration of standardized management systems: a dilemma? Systems, 3, 45–59.

Saunila, M., Pekkola, S., & Ukko, J. (2014). The relationship between innovation capability and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(2), 234-249.

Schriber, S., & Löwstedt, J. (2020). Reconsidering ordinary and dynamic capabilities in strategic change. European Management Journal, 38(3), 377-387.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Silva, E. C., & Pedron, C. D. (2019). Elementos determinantes para a capacidade de inovação das empresas: uma revisão sistemática da literatura| determinants elements for innovation capability of companies: a systematic review of literature. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação (Brazilian Journal of Management & Innovation), 7(1), 45-63.

Smith, M. K., Busi, M., Ball, P. D., & Meer, R. van der (2008). Factors influencing an organisation’s ability to manage innovation: a structured literature review and conceptual model. International Journal of Innovation Management. 12(4), 655-676.

Soares, S. V., Picolli, I. R. A., & Casagrande, J. L. (2018). Pesquisa bibliográfica, pesquisa bibliométrica, artigo de revisão e ensaio teórico em administração e contabilidade. Administração: ensino e pesquisa, 19(2), 1-19.

Strønen, F., Hoholm, T., Kværner, K. J., & Støme, L. N. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and innovation capabilities: The case of the ‘Innovation Clinic’. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 13(1), 89-116.

Tang, H. K. (1998). An inventory of organizational innovativeness. Technovation. 19(1), 41-51.

Teece, D. J. (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Academy of management perspectives, 28(4), 328-352.

Teece, D. J. (2019). A capability theory of the firm: an economics and (strategic) management perspective. New Zealand Economic Papers, 53(1), 1-43.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.

Terwiesch, C., & Ulrich, K. T. (2009). Innovation tournaments: Creating and selecting exceptional opportunities. Harvard Business Press.

Tidd, J. (2021). A review and critical assessment of the ISO56002 innovation management systems standard: Evidence and limitations. International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), 24(01), 2150049.

Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2018). Innovation Management Challenges: From Fads To Fundamentals. International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), 22(05), 1-13.

Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2021). Managing Innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. New Jersey: Wiley. Seventh edition.

Tidd, J., Bessant, J. & Pavitt, K. (1997) Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organisational Change. Great Britain: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Valladares, P. S. D. D. A., Vasconcellos, M. A. D., & Serio, L. C. D. (2014). Capacidade de inovação: revisão sistemática da literatura. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 18(5), 598-626.

Vasconcelos, M. A. (2008). Modelo de inovação [trabalho não publicado]. Fórum de Inovação, Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Wang, C.L. and Ahmed, P.K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 31-51.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180.

Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic management journal, 24(10), 991-995.

Yepes, V., Pellicer, E., Alarcon, L. F. and Correa, C. L. (2016). Creative innovation in Spanish construction firms. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 142, 1.

Zahra, S.A., Sapienza, H. and Davidsson, P. (2006) Entrepr.eneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 917-955.

Zawislack, P. A., Cherubini Alves, A., Tello-Gamarra, J., Barbieux, D., & Reichert, F. M. (2012). Innovation capability: From technology development to transaction capability. Journal of technology management & innovation, 7(2), 14-27.

Zhou, S. S., Zhou, A. J., Feng, J., & Jiang, S. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(5), 731-747.

Zollo, M. and Winter, S. (2002). Deliberate learzhouning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 339-351.

Downloads

Published

25.08.2021

How to Cite

Silva, S. B. da. (2021). Improving the firm innovation capacity through the adoption of standardized innovation management systems: a comparative analysis of the ISO 56002:2019 with the literature on firm innovation capacity. International Journal of Innovation, 9(2), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v9i2.19273

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): May/Aug.

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Innovation

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal.

The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s).

The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s).

The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html

Authors  are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.